President Obama and Federal Communications Commissions chairman Tom Wheeler, a Democrat appointed to the position by the president, are not seeing eye-to-eye on net-neutrality, which could create chaos on an issue about which Democrats hold the majority decision, Brian Fung and Nancy Scola report for The Washington Post.
Hours after President Obama called for the FCC to pass tougher regulations on high-speed Internet providers,
Wheeler was in a conference room with representatives from Google, Yahoo and Etsy saying he "preferred a more nuanced solution," Fung and Scola write. "That approach would
deliver some of what Obama wants but also would address the concerns of
the companies that provide Internet access to millions of Americans,
such as Comcast, Time Warner Cable and AT&T."
Meeting attendees, who described Wheeler as visibly frustrated, quoted the chairman as saying, “What you want is what everyone wants: an open Internet that doesn’t
affect your business. What I’ve got to figure out is
how to split the baby," Fung and Scola write. (Associated Press photo by Jaquelyn Martin: President Obama and then-nominee for FCC chair Tom Wheeler)
"The president wants clear rules to prevent Internet service
providers from auctioning the fastest speeds to the highest bidders, a
scenario that could favor rich Web firms over start-ups," Fung and Scola write. "Wheeler,
a former lobbyist for the cable and telecommunications industry, has
floated proposals that aim to limit the ability of service providers to
charge Web companies, such as Netflix or Google, to reach their
customers. But critics have argued that his approach would give the
providers too much leeway to favor some services over others."
That could put Obama and Wheeler at odds, Fung and Scola write. "A growing source of frustration for White House and congressional
Democrats is that they have three of their own on the five-member
commission at the FCC, a majority that should give them the power to
push through a policy of their liking. But if Wheeler charts a different
course, he could bring the other members along with him.
And, as
Wheeler reminded participants at his meeting with Web companies Monday,
the FCC does not answer to the Obama administration." According to officials, Wheeler said, “I am an independent agency." (Read more)
A digest of events, trends, issues, ideas and journalism from and about rural America, by the Institute for Rural Journalism, based at the University of Kentucky. Links may expire, require subscription or go behind pay walls. Please send news and knowledge you think would be useful to benjy.hamm@uky.edu.
Wednesday, November 12, 2014
As a joke, Dartmouth College buddies write-in frat brother for public office, and he wins election
A common perception is that the rich, powerful big wigs dominate public office—and that candidates with the most money and their hands in the most back pockets win elections. But an election in Hanover, N.H., showed that the American way is alive and well, even if it might have started out as a joke. (Valley News photo by Sarah Priestap: Mick Wopinski)
When Dartmouth College senior Sam Todd saw that no candidates were running for the office of Grafton County register of probate, he wrote-in the name Mick Wopinski, one of his frat brothers, Nora Doyle-Burr reports for the Valley News. Todd asked his friends to also vote for Wopinski, and when votes were tallied, Wopinski won the election with 20 votes, beating out other write-in candidates, Philip Hanlon and Keggy the Kegger.
Wopinski, who didn't vote for himself, told Doyle-Burr, “For me, it was a joke. I had no idea it was possible that I could win.” Wopinski, who plans to graduate in June with a double major in economics and Russian, is currently researching the position to find out what the job entails and whether he will accept it. He said he does have plans to move out of state after graduation, which would make him ineligible to retain the position. (Read more)
When Dartmouth College senior Sam Todd saw that no candidates were running for the office of Grafton County register of probate, he wrote-in the name Mick Wopinski, one of his frat brothers, Nora Doyle-Burr reports for the Valley News. Todd asked his friends to also vote for Wopinski, and when votes were tallied, Wopinski won the election with 20 votes, beating out other write-in candidates, Philip Hanlon and Keggy the Kegger.
Wopinski, who didn't vote for himself, told Doyle-Burr, “For me, it was a joke. I had no idea it was possible that I could win.” Wopinski, who plans to graduate in June with a double major in economics and Russian, is currently researching the position to find out what the job entails and whether he will accept it. He said he does have plans to move out of state after graduation, which would make him ineligible to retain the position. (Read more)
Labels:
elections,
government,
politics
NPR to air series on delinquent mine safety fines; first show is at 4 p.m. (ET) today
Beginning at 4 p.m. (ET) today NPR will begin airing a series on delinquent mine safety fines as part of its show All Things Considered, NPR's Howard Berkes said in an email to The Rural Blog. "We’ve documented what happens at mines that get away with not paying millions in safety fines while they’re delinquent, most for years, some for decades," Berkes writes. Additional shows will air on Thursday and Friday morning on All Things Considered.
Labels:
mine safety,
radio,
talk radio,
workplace safety
Tuesday, November 11, 2014
Obama wants Internet regulated like utilities; Sen. McConnell says move would stifle innovation
President Barack Obama said on Monday that because the Internet is as important in Americans' lives as electricity and telephone service, it should be "regulated like those utilities to protect consumers," Edward Wyatt writes for The New York Times. Obama said the Federal Communications Commission should make this change to keep broadband companies from slowing down legal content or allowing content providers to pay extra for a fast lane. This discussion is especially important for rural areas, many of which do not have adequate broadband access to begin with. Also, innovation and start-ups can be particularly beneficial to rural people, so considering whether this change would promote that is important.
Many see the president's move as support of Tom Wheeler, F.C.C. chairman, who is working on a plan to protect open Internet—called net neutrality. "The debate may hinge on whether Internet access is considered a necessity, like electricity, or more of an often-costy option, like cable TV," Wyatt writes. Netflix, Democrats in Congress and consumer advocacy groups are the move's primary supporters, but leading providers of Internet access, Republicans and some investment groups do not like the idea and say this regulation is too heavy-handed and will hurt online investment and innovation.
Companies that make routers and servers, represented by the Telecommunications Industry Association, said they "strongly urge regulators to refrain from reclassification that will guarantee harm to consumers, the economy and the very technologies we're trying to protect." Senator John Thune of South Dakota said the effort "would turn the Internet into a government-regulated utility and stifle our nation's dynamic and robust Internet sector with rules written nearly 80 years ago for plain old telephone service."
U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell sent a statement in response to Obama's announcement about the regulations. He wrote that the Internet currently allows innovators to create and sell products people like and makes jobs "without waiting around for government permission." The President's decision "to abandon this successful approach in favor of more heavy-handed regulation that will stifle innovation and concentrate more power in the hands of Washington bureaucrats is a terrible idea. The Commission would be wise to reject it." (Read more)
![]() |
| Tom Wheeler, chairman of the FCC |
Companies that make routers and servers, represented by the Telecommunications Industry Association, said they "strongly urge regulators to refrain from reclassification that will guarantee harm to consumers, the economy and the very technologies we're trying to protect." Senator John Thune of South Dakota said the effort "would turn the Internet into a government-regulated utility and stifle our nation's dynamic and robust Internet sector with rules written nearly 80 years ago for plain old telephone service."
U.S. Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell sent a statement in response to Obama's announcement about the regulations. He wrote that the Internet currently allows innovators to create and sell products people like and makes jobs "without waiting around for government permission." The President's decision "to abandon this successful approach in favor of more heavy-handed regulation that will stifle innovation and concentrate more power in the hands of Washington bureaucrats is a terrible idea. The Commission would be wise to reject it." (Read more)
Veterans can serve as leaders on America's farms; programs offer opportunities
Approximately 45 percent of armed services members are from rural America, and a chart from the USDA's Economic Research Service (ERS) shows that 3.9 million veterans live in rural areas now, as opposed to 6.6 million 20 years ago. "However, in spite of a decline in the number of rural veterans, because they are aging in greater numbers than the general population, those who have served still make up 10 percent of the rural population," Ann Tracy Mueller writes for Agri-Pulse.
Many of those who work on farms are older veterans, and they are "well situated to take on leadership roles in rural communities," according to the ERS's November 2013 brief. By 2050, American agriculture will be expected to help feed a world population of 9 billion people, and more farmers will be needed. Various organizations help provide "training, marketing and financial help to soldiers wishing to return to the nation's agrarian roots," Mueller reports.
For example, the Farmer-Veteran Coalition assists returning veterans in finding work and training on farms and ranches. Veterans Farm helps bring veterans back into society by offering a Beginning Farmer fellowship program, during which veterans can gain the education needed to start their own farms or work for larger farming organizations. Other examples of such programs are Veterans Sustainable Agriculture Training, Armed to Farm and the Veteran Farmers Project.
The USDA is supporting veterans through a variety of projects to assist those who wish to get involved with agriculture. For example, more than $9 million is available for outreach and technical assistance for veterans who are new to farming and ranching. "Known as the 2501 program, [it] will help community-based organizations and partners work with these groups to acquire, own and operate farms and participate in USDA programs," Mueller writes. (Read more)
Many of those who work on farms are older veterans, and they are "well situated to take on leadership roles in rural communities," according to the ERS's November 2013 brief. By 2050, American agriculture will be expected to help feed a world population of 9 billion people, and more farmers will be needed. Various organizations help provide "training, marketing and financial help to soldiers wishing to return to the nation's agrarian roots," Mueller reports.
For example, the Farmer-Veteran Coalition assists returning veterans in finding work and training on farms and ranches. Veterans Farm helps bring veterans back into society by offering a Beginning Farmer fellowship program, during which veterans can gain the education needed to start their own farms or work for larger farming organizations. Other examples of such programs are Veterans Sustainable Agriculture Training, Armed to Farm and the Veteran Farmers Project.
The USDA is supporting veterans through a variety of projects to assist those who wish to get involved with agriculture. For example, more than $9 million is available for outreach and technical assistance for veterans who are new to farming and ranching. "Known as the 2501 program, [it] will help community-based organizations and partners work with these groups to acquire, own and operate farms and participate in USDA programs," Mueller writes. (Read more)
Rural hospitals deal with shortages of specialists
Many rural areas struggle with doctor shortages. Lack of specialists is also a problem. In southwestern Virginia, "rural health care is a long and winding road for many patients," Joe Dashiell writes for WDBJ-TV.
For example, Wendy Welch, the director of the Graduate Medical Education Consortium in southwestern Virginia, said, "We are facing a massive shortage of dentists and dental care. We're facing a continued dearth of endocrinology care, people who work particularly with diabetes and kidney function." Bill Jacobsen, the administrator of Carilion Franklin Memorial Hospital, said Franklin County is six psychiatrists short and that the 52,000-citizen region doesn't have even one full-time psychiatrist.
At the Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine in Blacksburg, hospitals in Virginia and nearby states were promoting their residency programs and regions to prospective doctors. Vicky Hill, the director of physician support and recruitment support services at Wythe County Community Hospital, said Southwest Virginia is a beautiful place, ". . . so we use the beatuy and the many things that are outdoors to do, as well as the convenience of the two interstates" to encourage doctors to consider working there.
Lots of medical students graduate with more than $200,000 in student loans, and that often is a determining factor when new doctors decide where to work. Jessica Hovancik, a third year student at VCOM, said she's considering practicing in a rural area. "I'm on OB/GYN right now, and we travel 45 minutes to a place called Chase City just to see five or six patients," Havancik said. "But they're so thankful that we take the time to come out there. And it gives you a good feeling at the end of the day."
The doctor and specialist shortage will become even more of an issue if appropriate actions aren't taken. What can be done? "Rural health care advocates would like to see debt forgiveness programs expanded and applied more evenly across rural Virginia, more nurse practitioners and physician assistants deployed in rural communities and expansion of tele-medicine to assist rural doctors and connect patients to health professionals in other areas," Dashiell writes. (Read more)
For example, Wendy Welch, the director of the Graduate Medical Education Consortium in southwestern Virginia, said, "We are facing a massive shortage of dentists and dental care. We're facing a continued dearth of endocrinology care, people who work particularly with diabetes and kidney function." Bill Jacobsen, the administrator of Carilion Franklin Memorial Hospital, said Franklin County is six psychiatrists short and that the 52,000-citizen region doesn't have even one full-time psychiatrist.
At the Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine in Blacksburg, hospitals in Virginia and nearby states were promoting their residency programs and regions to prospective doctors. Vicky Hill, the director of physician support and recruitment support services at Wythe County Community Hospital, said Southwest Virginia is a beautiful place, ". . . so we use the beatuy and the many things that are outdoors to do, as well as the convenience of the two interstates" to encourage doctors to consider working there.
Lots of medical students graduate with more than $200,000 in student loans, and that often is a determining factor when new doctors decide where to work. Jessica Hovancik, a third year student at VCOM, said she's considering practicing in a rural area. "I'm on OB/GYN right now, and we travel 45 minutes to a place called Chase City just to see five or six patients," Havancik said. "But they're so thankful that we take the time to come out there. And it gives you a good feeling at the end of the day."
The doctor and specialist shortage will become even more of an issue if appropriate actions aren't taken. What can be done? "Rural health care advocates would like to see debt forgiveness programs expanded and applied more evenly across rural Virginia, more nurse practitioners and physician assistants deployed in rural communities and expansion of tele-medicine to assist rural doctors and connect patients to health professionals in other areas," Dashiell writes. (Read more)
Danville, Ky., newspaper converts archives into digital files
Old newspaper stories used to disappear into the archives perhaps never to return. However, The Advocate-Messenger of Danville, Ky., donated its old contents—from as far back as 1871—to the Boyle County Public Library. Assistant research librarian Mary Girard is converting them into digital files, Todd Kleffman writes for The Advocate-Messenger.
"We are very happy to have the library take on a project like this,"said John Nelson, the Advocate's executive editor. "These were records the public didn't really have access to." He said their more recent records are already electronic, and it will be useful for the public to have digital access to the older files.
Changing brittle newspaper pages into digital files is "tedious and detail-oriented," Girard said. But as a self-described "history geek," she said she enjoys the work. "Things discovered in Danville's past can shed new light on the present," she said.
One specific article that caught her eye was a piece from 1905 about Danville merchants concerned about losing customers to out-of-town competition. "Back in 1905, they were talking about shopping local. We are having that same conversation today," Girard said. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
The project will likely take two years to complete. Girard posts some of what she finds in a Facebook group called "You might be from Boyle County if..." People who are part of the group enjoy looking at what she has posted and often help her identify individuals in some of the old photos.
"One of the early beneficiaries of the on-going digitalization of the old Advocate clips has been Michael Hughes, president of the recently formed Boyle County African American Historical Society," Kleffman writes. He was researching history of Danville's black community, so he visited the Advocate, and when he saw the archives, he knew it would take a long time to look through them. Browsing the digital files is much easier. "It's been a great help," he said. "It's just a treasure chest of information that the younger generation didn't know anything about and the older people had mostly forgotten about." (Read more)
![]() |
| Mary Girard and her mother, Annabel Girard, look through the archives. |
Changing brittle newspaper pages into digital files is "tedious and detail-oriented," Girard said. But as a self-described "history geek," she said she enjoys the work. "Things discovered in Danville's past can shed new light on the present," she said.
One specific article that caught her eye was a piece from 1905 about Danville merchants concerned about losing customers to out-of-town competition. "Back in 1905, they were talking about shopping local. We are having that same conversation today," Girard said. "The more things change, the more they stay the same."
The project will likely take two years to complete. Girard posts some of what she finds in a Facebook group called "You might be from Boyle County if..." People who are part of the group enjoy looking at what she has posted and often help her identify individuals in some of the old photos.
"One of the early beneficiaries of the on-going digitalization of the old Advocate clips has been Michael Hughes, president of the recently formed Boyle County African American Historical Society," Kleffman writes. He was researching history of Danville's black community, so he visited the Advocate, and when he saw the archives, he knew it would take a long time to look through them. Browsing the digital files is much easier. "It's been a great help," he said. "It's just a treasure chest of information that the younger generation didn't know anything about and the older people had mostly forgotten about." (Read more)
Labels:
digital media,
libraries,
newspapers
Monday, November 10, 2014
What to expect new Congress to do about the ACA
Now that Tuesday's election has passed and Republicans have control of Congress, many are speculating about how they will challenge the Affordable Care Act, Drew Altman, president and chief executive officer of the Kaiser Family Foundation, writes for The Wall Street Journal.
"There will be early 'statement legislation' to repeal the law and possibly to repeal the ACA's individual mandate, a linchpin of the law that spreads risk and makes its insurance market changes work," Altman reports. However, if the statement legislation passes, President Barack Obama will veto it.
That attempt will likely be followed by legislative efforts to undermine the ACA in more subtle ways. One example might be, John Boehner said Thursday, repealing "the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a not-yet appointed commission with power to trigger reductions in Medicare payments if spending increases exceed certain levels and Congress does not come up with an alternative approach," Altman writes. Also the requirement for larger employers to cover their workers or pay a penalty could be repealed, possibly by changing the definition of full-time workers for 30 hours per week to 40. Sen. Mitch McConnell mentioned Wednesday that they may try to get rid of a medical device law that currently helps finance the law.
However, these proposals don't change the main functions of the ACA: its coverage expansions and insurance reforms, which will probably continue, even if some changes are made. "For most people, opposition to the ACA isn't about the details; Obamacare is mainly a proxy for their dislike of the president and their unease about the nation's direction," Altman writes. Business and medical device makers and insiders would be the ones primarily concerned about the specificities of the legislative proposals to chip away at the ACA.
Currently, small businesses do not have to provide insurance for their workers, and most large companies do that anyway. It's important to keep the changes in perspective because repealing the employer mandate, for example, would not have that much of an impact. "As proposals to modify the ACA are introduced in the new Congress, it will be critical for the media to provide perspective, explain what proposals mean for people and distinguish between small changes and ones that would cut to the core of the law," Altman writes. (Read more)
"There will be early 'statement legislation' to repeal the law and possibly to repeal the ACA's individual mandate, a linchpin of the law that spreads risk and makes its insurance market changes work," Altman reports. However, if the statement legislation passes, President Barack Obama will veto it.
That attempt will likely be followed by legislative efforts to undermine the ACA in more subtle ways. One example might be, John Boehner said Thursday, repealing "the Independent Payment Advisory Board, a not-yet appointed commission with power to trigger reductions in Medicare payments if spending increases exceed certain levels and Congress does not come up with an alternative approach," Altman writes. Also the requirement for larger employers to cover their workers or pay a penalty could be repealed, possibly by changing the definition of full-time workers for 30 hours per week to 40. Sen. Mitch McConnell mentioned Wednesday that they may try to get rid of a medical device law that currently helps finance the law.
However, these proposals don't change the main functions of the ACA: its coverage expansions and insurance reforms, which will probably continue, even if some changes are made. "For most people, opposition to the ACA isn't about the details; Obamacare is mainly a proxy for their dislike of the president and their unease about the nation's direction," Altman writes. Business and medical device makers and insiders would be the ones primarily concerned about the specificities of the legislative proposals to chip away at the ACA.
Currently, small businesses do not have to provide insurance for their workers, and most large companies do that anyway. It's important to keep the changes in perspective because repealing the employer mandate, for example, would not have that much of an impact. "As proposals to modify the ACA are introduced in the new Congress, it will be critical for the media to provide perspective, explain what proposals mean for people and distinguish between small changes and ones that would cut to the core of the law," Altman writes. (Read more)
Communities try to circumvent state laws that divide broadband access
In 19 states, state laws curb the municipalities from building or expanding high-speed Internet service networks. Supporters say the reason for the laws "is to limit taxpayer exposure to projects that at times fail and for which there may be little demand," Edward Wyatt writes for The New York Times.
However, Tom Wheeler, the Federal Communications Commission chairman, said providing broadband Internet access is important and that the commission can override the state laws. This contributes to the debate about how much authority the federal commission has over the states and raises the question of whether local government or private companies should take responsibility for providing the service.
Chattanooga, Tenn., and Wilson, N.C., have both requested that the commission override their state laws, and the F.C.C. is expected to respond next year. "If you want to have economic development in a town like this, you've got to have fiber," said Gregory Bethea, the town administrator of Pinetops, a town of 1,300 people approximately 20 miles northeast of Wilson.
In most cities, more pressing issues exist—like the need for more or better roads and bridges, said Charles M. Davidson, a director of the Advanced Communications Law & Policy Institute at New York Law School. Broadband "is not where we have the most compelling need for investment. And when government networks fail, the failure is on the backs of the people," he said.
However, those who support community broadband say "the level of opposition the systems provoke from cable and phone companies is evidence that they work," Wyatt writes. "If the people, acting through their local governments, want to pursue competitive community broadband, they shouldn't be stopped by state laws promoted by cable and telephone companies that don't want the competition," Wheeler said.
The FCC will have to get past a United States Supreme Court precent if it wants to invalidate the state law. "I am pretty confident that if the F.C.C. pre-empts state laws, they ultimately will lose those cases," said Randolph J. May, president of the Free State Foundation and a former associate general counsel for the F.C.C. "The Supreme Court jurisprudence is pretty clear."
However, Wilson and Chattanooga have contended that broadband service is considered an information service rather than a telecommunication service, so the Supreme Court's rule may not apply. (Read more)
However, Tom Wheeler, the Federal Communications Commission chairman, said providing broadband Internet access is important and that the commission can override the state laws. This contributes to the debate about how much authority the federal commission has over the states and raises the question of whether local government or private companies should take responsibility for providing the service.
Chattanooga, Tenn., and Wilson, N.C., have both requested that the commission override their state laws, and the F.C.C. is expected to respond next year. "If you want to have economic development in a town like this, you've got to have fiber," said Gregory Bethea, the town administrator of Pinetops, a town of 1,300 people approximately 20 miles northeast of Wilson.
In most cities, more pressing issues exist—like the need for more or better roads and bridges, said Charles M. Davidson, a director of the Advanced Communications Law & Policy Institute at New York Law School. Broadband "is not where we have the most compelling need for investment. And when government networks fail, the failure is on the backs of the people," he said.
However, those who support community broadband say "the level of opposition the systems provoke from cable and phone companies is evidence that they work," Wyatt writes. "If the people, acting through their local governments, want to pursue competitive community broadband, they shouldn't be stopped by state laws promoted by cable and telephone companies that don't want the competition," Wheeler said.
The FCC will have to get past a United States Supreme Court precent if it wants to invalidate the state law. "I am pretty confident that if the F.C.C. pre-empts state laws, they ultimately will lose those cases," said Randolph J. May, president of the Free State Foundation and a former associate general counsel for the F.C.C. "The Supreme Court jurisprudence is pretty clear."
However, Wilson and Chattanooga have contended that broadband service is considered an information service rather than a telecommunication service, so the Supreme Court's rule may not apply. (Read more)
Parents spanking children: research, prevalence, possible effects
In 2012, more than 70 percent of Americans agreed that "it is sometimes necessary to discipline a child with a good, hard spanking," according to a study sponsored by the National Science Foundation under the direction of Tom W. Smith, Richard V. Reeves and Emily Cuddy write for Brookings. Corporal punishment is still permitted in 19 states. Usually the goal is to correct bad behavior through physical punishment, which is generally quite effective short term. But what are the long term effects?
Some research studies show that children spanked often are more likely to develop mental health issues such as anxiety, depression and alcohol and drug abuse. Physical punishment may teach a child to associate violence with power over others. Important to note is that these studies deal with how regular and/or severe physical punishment correlates with child behavior.
Other studies indicate that corporal punishment is linked to decreased cognitive ability in early childhood. For example, a 2009 study within the National Longitudinal Study of Youth showed that children who received little or no corporal punishment gained cognitive ability more quickly than the children who were spanked. However, the reason for this may be that "parents who spank their children may be weaker parents overall, and spanking is simply one way in which this difference in parenting quality manifests itself," Reeves and Cuddy write.
According to a study using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, a significant gap in parenting quality does not exist between those who do and don't hit their children. However, most studies show that spanking "becomes problematic with increased frequency and/or intensity," Reeves and Cuddy report. A significant difference exists between spanking a child once per month and spanking multiple times per day and between spanking lightly with an open hand and spanking aggressively with a belt.
Overall, the writers suggest that U.S. policy-makers focus on encouraging positive parenting behavior such as reading to children rather than focusing on spanking prevention. Many child development experts believe that "alternatives to spanking can be just as effective in terms of regulating behavior," Reeves and Cuddy write. (Read more)
Some research studies show that children spanked often are more likely to develop mental health issues such as anxiety, depression and alcohol and drug abuse. Physical punishment may teach a child to associate violence with power over others. Important to note is that these studies deal with how regular and/or severe physical punishment correlates with child behavior.
Other studies indicate that corporal punishment is linked to decreased cognitive ability in early childhood. For example, a 2009 study within the National Longitudinal Study of Youth showed that children who received little or no corporal punishment gained cognitive ability more quickly than the children who were spanked. However, the reason for this may be that "parents who spank their children may be weaker parents overall, and spanking is simply one way in which this difference in parenting quality manifests itself," Reeves and Cuddy write.
According to a study using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Children of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, a significant gap in parenting quality does not exist between those who do and don't hit their children. However, most studies show that spanking "becomes problematic with increased frequency and/or intensity," Reeves and Cuddy report. A significant difference exists between spanking a child once per month and spanking multiple times per day and between spanking lightly with an open hand and spanking aggressively with a belt.
Overall, the writers suggest that U.S. policy-makers focus on encouraging positive parenting behavior such as reading to children rather than focusing on spanking prevention. Many child development experts believe that "alternatives to spanking can be just as effective in terms of regulating behavior," Reeves and Cuddy write. (Read more)
Labels:
children,
corporal punishment,
parenting,
schools
Saturday, November 08, 2014
GOP rules coal country but has fewer coal-friendly Democrats with whom to challenge CO2 regulations
"The Republicans’ romp this week may have permanently turned coal country from blue to red," Erica Martinson reports for Politico. "Coal-heavy
districts in West Virginia, Kentucky and Illinois that had been
steadily moving away from Democrats in recent elections appear to have
completed that shift Tuesday, when they overwhelmingly backed
Republicans who vowed to oppose what they call President Barack Obama’s 'war on coal.'"
Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who carried some Democratic coal counties that had never voted for him, has said he will use language in approprations bills to fight the Obama administration's anti-coal efforts, specifically carbon-dioxide limits aimed at limiting climate change. However, the defeat of some coal-sympathetic Democrats appears to leave him short of the 60 votes generally required to do anything significant in the Senate. He could pull out all the stops and pass the measure with 51 votes under budget-reconciliation rules, which override Senate filibusters, but he has also said he would not force a government shutdown as majority leader.
"Earlier this year, seven Senate Democrats lobbied Obama to rethink" the climate-change rules, but "One of them, Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor, won’t be returning next year," and another, "Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu . . . faces a difficult runoff election next month," Martinson notes. "Republicans will still have Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Donnelly of Indiana to turn to on coal issues."
Manchin told Martinson he still hopes to foster some compromise on the issue, "but he hasn’t written off retreating to the state and running for his old job of governor if he can’t find common ground between the two parties in Washington," she writes, quoting him: “I’m keeping every option open, I’ll wait until next year, see how things shape out. If it looks like it’s going to be same old, same old . . . it’s not going to be a place I’m going to want to spend a great deal of time.”
![]() |
| McConnell at a Kentucky coal pile (Associated Press photo) |
"Earlier this year, seven Senate Democrats lobbied Obama to rethink" the climate-change rules, but "One of them, Arkansas Sen. Mark Pryor, won’t be returning next year," and another, "Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu . . . faces a difficult runoff election next month," Martinson notes. "Republicans will still have Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Heidi Heitkamp of North Dakota and Joe Donnelly of Indiana to turn to on coal issues."
Manchin told Martinson he still hopes to foster some compromise on the issue, "but he hasn’t written off retreating to the state and running for his old job of governor if he can’t find common ground between the two parties in Washington," she writes, quoting him: “I’m keeping every option open, I’ll wait until next year, see how things shape out. If it looks like it’s going to be same old, same old . . . it’s not going to be a place I’m going to want to spend a great deal of time.”
Labels:
air pollution,
climate change,
coal,
elections,
global warming,
politics
Friday, November 07, 2014
West Virginia sees historic change in party control, but veteran observer says it won't mean much
![]() |
| Ken Ward Jr. (Photo by Al Cross) |
"It’s popular among the GOP’s career campaign consultants to describe this election as some huge change in power, in who runs things in West Virginia," Ward writes on his Coal Tattoo blog. "It’s the end of more than 80 years of Democratic control, they say over and over."
Ward notes that West Virginia re-elected two Republican governors in recent decades, that most Democrats kowtow to the coal industry, and cites a Gazette editorial that blamed bad campaigns for Democratic defeats: "They ran ads just like the Republicans, suggesting that all West Virginia’s problems are the fault of President Obama and the EPA. The result? When faced with a genuine Republican and a pale imitation, people vote for the real thing or don’t vote at all."
Noting that 23 percent of voters told exit pollsters that someone in their household works in the coal industry, Ward says a Democratic pitch on mine safety "doesn’t get much traction when West Virginia’s House, Senate and governor’s office—all controlled by Democrats—pass such a weak excuse for a mine safety bill after the Upper Big Branch Mine disaster."
Labels:
Appalachia,
coal,
elections,
journalism,
mine safety,
politics,
rural journalism
Young, first-generation farmers and ranchers are the future of U.S. agriculture
The future of farming and ranching is in the hands of young Americans, many of whom have little to no agriculture experience but are buying land wherever they can find it and learning farming on the fly, Teresa Wiltz reports for Stateline.
"The fastest growing group of farmers and ranchers is 65 and older,
according to census statistics compiled by the U.S. Department of
Agriculture," Wiltz writes. "But the second-fastest growing group is young farmers and ranchers
who are under 35. There are only about 110,000 nationwide, but they are
the only age group under 55 whose numbers are increasing. Most of them
are first-generation, new to the industry and trying to earn a living on
independent farms. According to a National Young Farmers’ Coalition report, the vast majority of young farmers—78 percent—did not grow up on a farm."
The first hurdle for young farmers is securing land, Wiltz writes. "According to the NYFC survey, 70 percent of farmers under 30 rent farmland, compared to 37 percent of farmers over 30. Farmers who were raised on a farm were much more likely to own land—65 percent—compared to 50 percent of farmers who did not grow up farming."
Holly Rippon-Butler, land access campaign manager for the National Young Farmers’ Coalition, said "more than two-thirds of American farmland is currently being farmed by individuals who are 55 and older, who will be nearing retirement over the next couple of decades," Wiltz writes. Rippon-Butler told Wiltz, “If we don’t help the young generation of farmers get on the land, retiring farmers will quickly run out of people to sell the land to, individuals who will continue to grow food on it and treat it as farmland.”
Some states have created programs to help young, new farmers, Wiltz writes. "Missouri, Maryland and Virginia, for example, are among the states that help prospective farmers access available land, while Massachusetts, Minnesota and Delaware provide financial assistance to independent farmers who are just starting out, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures."
"In Nebraska and Iowa, landowners are offered tax incentives to sell or lease land to young farmers," Wiltz writes. "Other states are experimenting with conservation easement programs, which designate certain amounts of land as farm; developers can’t buy the land, and, for example, turn it into condos. Anyone buying the land has to use it strictly for agriculture." (Read more)
![]() |
Chris and Annie Newman quit city jobs to become
first-gen farmers (Stateline photo by Rollie Hudson) |
The first hurdle for young farmers is securing land, Wiltz writes. "According to the NYFC survey, 70 percent of farmers under 30 rent farmland, compared to 37 percent of farmers over 30. Farmers who were raised on a farm were much more likely to own land—65 percent—compared to 50 percent of farmers who did not grow up farming."
Holly Rippon-Butler, land access campaign manager for the National Young Farmers’ Coalition, said "more than two-thirds of American farmland is currently being farmed by individuals who are 55 and older, who will be nearing retirement over the next couple of decades," Wiltz writes. Rippon-Butler told Wiltz, “If we don’t help the young generation of farmers get on the land, retiring farmers will quickly run out of people to sell the land to, individuals who will continue to grow food on it and treat it as farmland.”
Some states have created programs to help young, new farmers, Wiltz writes. "Missouri, Maryland and Virginia, for example, are among the states that help prospective farmers access available land, while Massachusetts, Minnesota and Delaware provide financial assistance to independent farmers who are just starting out, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures."
"In Nebraska and Iowa, landowners are offered tax incentives to sell or lease land to young farmers," Wiltz writes. "Other states are experimenting with conservation easement programs, which designate certain amounts of land as farm; developers can’t buy the land, and, for example, turn it into condos. Anyone buying the land has to use it strictly for agriculture." (Read more)
Labels:
agriculture,
farming,
land use,
landowners,
ranchers
FDA doing poor job of testing foods for pesticide levels, Government Accountability Office says
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not conduct enough testing on pesticide residue on foreign and domestic foods to determine whether or not the food safe, says a report from the Government Accountability Office, Kimberly Kindy reports for The Washington Post.
The report said that FDA "is testing less than one-tenth of 1 percent of all imported fruits and vegetables and less than 1 percent of domestic fruits and vegetables," Kindy writes. "Federal auditors said the agency’s pesticide testing program is not 'statistically valid,' making it impossible for it to meet one of its mandates, which is to 'determine the national incidence and level of pesticide residues in the foods it regulates.'”
Another concern raised by the report was about decisions by the FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture "not to test for many commonly-used pesticides for which the federal government has set strict residue limits," Kindy writes. "Auditors were critical of FDA and the USDA for failing to disclose this limitation in their annual reports."
"USDA tests for pesticide residue in poultry, meat and processed egg products," Kindy writes. "Although FDA and USDA are not legally required to test for specific pesticides, they are responsible for enforcing maximum residue limits that are set by the Environmental Protection Agency. When limits are violated, food products are subject to seizure." (Read more)
The report said that FDA "is testing less than one-tenth of 1 percent of all imported fruits and vegetables and less than 1 percent of domestic fruits and vegetables," Kindy writes. "Federal auditors said the agency’s pesticide testing program is not 'statistically valid,' making it impossible for it to meet one of its mandates, which is to 'determine the national incidence and level of pesticide residues in the foods it regulates.'”
Another concern raised by the report was about decisions by the FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture "not to test for many commonly-used pesticides for which the federal government has set strict residue limits," Kindy writes. "Auditors were critical of FDA and the USDA for failing to disclose this limitation in their annual reports."
"USDA tests for pesticide residue in poultry, meat and processed egg products," Kindy writes. "Although FDA and USDA are not legally required to test for specific pesticides, they are responsible for enforcing maximum residue limits that are set by the Environmental Protection Agency. When limits are violated, food products are subject to seizure." (Read more)
Labels:
agriculture,
food,
food safety,
pesticides
Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama have highest rate of premature births
One in nine U.S. babies is born prematurely, and more than 450,000 are born too soon each year, says the March of Dimes 2014 Premature Birth Report Card, which gave each state a letter grade for how well they fare on premature births.
The South scored the lowest, with Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama all receiving an "F," while Florida and South Carolina were given a "D." Overall, the U.S. received a "C," with 19 states—most of them largely rural—getting a "C," while 21 states were given a "B" and five an "A." (Read more) (March of Dimes map)
The South scored the lowest, with Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama all receiving an "F," while Florida and South Carolina were given a "D." Overall, the U.S. received a "C," with 19 states—most of them largely rural—getting a "C," while 21 states were given a "B" and five an "A." (Read more) (March of Dimes map)
Labels:
child welfare,
children
Farm Watch program in Central Iowa encourages rural residents to report suspicious activity
A partnership between DuPont and the sheriff's office in Story County, Iowa, has introduced a neighborhood watch-inspired program to Central Iowa. Called Farm Watch, the program encourages the county's 92,000 residents—along with frequent visitors, such as delivery drivers—to report suspicious activities in an attempt to help protect farms and rural landowners from theft and other crimes, Kathy Varney reports for Illinois Farmer Today. (DuPont photo)
The program asks farmers and rural residents to place signs on or near their property. Each sign has a phone number to report suspicious activity, Varney writes. Story County Sheriff Paul Fitzgerald said in a newsletter introducing the program, “We want to educate our citizens on the importance of being observant and help them learn observation skills that can be employed in Farm Watch.”
So far 60 people have signed up for the program, and 93 signs have been placed in rural areas, said Lt. Leanna Ellis, Story County field services commander, Varney writes. Fitzgerald told Varney, "People are sometimes hesitant to call us if they see something’s not quite right, but this will make it easier to take that step and call. They are not bothering us—and we’re here 24 hours a day.” (Read more)
The program asks farmers and rural residents to place signs on or near their property. Each sign has a phone number to report suspicious activity, Varney writes. Story County Sheriff Paul Fitzgerald said in a newsletter introducing the program, “We want to educate our citizens on the importance of being observant and help them learn observation skills that can be employed in Farm Watch.”
So far 60 people have signed up for the program, and 93 signs have been placed in rural areas, said Lt. Leanna Ellis, Story County field services commander, Varney writes. Fitzgerald told Varney, "People are sometimes hesitant to call us if they see something’s not quite right, but this will make it easier to take that step and call. They are not bothering us—and we’re here 24 hours a day.” (Read more)
Labels:
agriculture,
crime,
farms,
rural-urban disparities
Nov. 12 webinar to focus on rural climate issues
The Institute for
Agriculture and Trade Policy is hosting a webinar on Rural Climate Dialogues from 4:30-5:30 (ET) on Nov. 12. The webinar is a follow-up to a three-day intensive forum in June in Morris, Minn., that discussed risks posed by
climate change and developed a shared, community-based response to
changing weather patterns and extreme weather events, says the Institute for
Agriculture and Trade Policy.
Next week's webinar includes outcomes, follow up and a participant’s perspective. Speaker are: Kyle Bozentko, Executive Director of the Jefferson Center; Natasha Mortenson, an agriculture teacher at Morris High School; and Wes Flinn and Jacob Just, Morris residents who participated in the dialogue. For more information or to register, click here.
Next week's webinar includes outcomes, follow up and a participant’s perspective. Speaker are: Kyle Bozentko, Executive Director of the Jefferson Center; Natasha Mortenson, an agriculture teacher at Morris High School; and Wes Flinn and Jacob Just, Morris residents who participated in the dialogue. For more information or to register, click here.
Labels:
climate change,
environment,
global warming,
information technology,
Internet,
rural-urban disparities,
technology
Thursday, November 06, 2014
States that have benefited most from Obamacare elected Republicans who oppose health reform
States that have most benefited from federal health reform were the ones on Tuesday that overwhelmingly supported Republican candidates who oppose Obamacare, Margot Sanger-Katz reports for The New York Times.
"Arkansas, Kentucky and West Virginia—states that saw substantial drops in the proportion of their residents without insurance—all elected Republican Senate candidates who oppose the Affordable Care Act," Sanger-Kate writes. "Control of the West Virginia state House of Delegates flipped from Democrats to Republicans. And Arkansas elected Republican supermajorities to both houses of its legislature along with a Republican governor, a situation that could imperil the Medicaid expansion that helped more than 200,000 of its poorest residents get health insurance."
Oddly, it was no surprise that Republicans won in those three states, Sanger-Katz writes. In fact, many people who only have health coverage because of Obamacare remain strongly opposed to President Obama and his administration.
"Republicans were the favorites in many of these races, and polling has shown that health reform had faded as a decisive issue for many voters," Sanger-Katz writes. "Counties that showed the biggest gains in insurance coverage were more likely to be strongly Republican-leaning than Democratic based on their 2012 presidential votes, according to an Upshot analysis of data from Enroll America and Civis Analytics. That pattern appears to have held." (Read more) (NYT map: For an interactive version click here)
"Arkansas, Kentucky and West Virginia—states that saw substantial drops in the proportion of their residents without insurance—all elected Republican Senate candidates who oppose the Affordable Care Act," Sanger-Kate writes. "Control of the West Virginia state House of Delegates flipped from Democrats to Republicans. And Arkansas elected Republican supermajorities to both houses of its legislature along with a Republican governor, a situation that could imperil the Medicaid expansion that helped more than 200,000 of its poorest residents get health insurance."
Oddly, it was no surprise that Republicans won in those three states, Sanger-Katz writes. In fact, many people who only have health coverage because of Obamacare remain strongly opposed to President Obama and his administration.
"Republicans were the favorites in many of these races, and polling has shown that health reform had faded as a decisive issue for many voters," Sanger-Katz writes. "Counties that showed the biggest gains in insurance coverage were more likely to be strongly Republican-leaning than Democratic based on their 2012 presidential votes, according to an Upshot analysis of data from Enroll America and Civis Analytics. That pattern appears to have held." (Read more) (NYT map: For an interactive version click here)
Labels:
elections,
health care,
health reform,
Obamacare,
Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act,
voting
In line to be Senate majority leader, Sen. Mitch McConnell pledges to work with President Obama
Fresh off a victory on Tuesday Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), is expected to be voted the Senate Majority Leader next week. As Senate majority leader, McConnell said "he intends to end gridlock and dysfunction in the Senate," Jack Brammer reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader. He also said "he would work with President Barack Obama on issues including trade
agreements and tax reform, particularly reducing the corporate income
tax rate." (Associated Press photo by J. Scott Applewhite: Sen. Mitch McConnell)
"He also said a Republican-led Senate will work longer hours, possibly late into the night on some occasions, and will allow consideration of amendments offered by both political parties and make committees more relevant," Brammer writes. "He complained that the Senate has not done much in recent years under Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, noting that the chamber has not considered an energy bill in seven years."
"McConnell, who will have to walk a political tightrope to keep the various factions of his caucus happy, said there will be disagreements with Obama, noting that Obama's veto pen makes him the only Democrat who 'counts,'" Brammer writes. "On foreign policy, McConnell said, immediate attention will be given to the Ebola virus crisis and relationships with Syrian rebels." (Read more)
"He also said a Republican-led Senate will work longer hours, possibly late into the night on some occasions, and will allow consideration of amendments offered by both political parties and make committees more relevant," Brammer writes. "He complained that the Senate has not done much in recent years under Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, noting that the chamber has not considered an energy bill in seven years."
"McConnell, who will have to walk a political tightrope to keep the various factions of his caucus happy, said there will be disagreements with Obama, noting that Obama's veto pen makes him the only Democrat who 'counts,'" Brammer writes. "On foreign policy, McConnell said, immediate attention will be given to the Ebola virus crisis and relationships with Syrian rebels." (Read more)
Seeing red: House Republican majority stretches far and wide across the U.S.
Republicans gained a majority in the Senate with Tuesday's vote. Even more impressive for the GOP is in the House, where Republicans have garnered their biggest majority in more than 60 years and could end up with their biggest majority in more than 80 years—if six still undecided races go to Republicans, Alexander Bolton reports for The Hill. Republicans have already won 243 seats—the most since the Truman administration—and could end up with 249, the most since 1930, Bolton writes. How big is the majority? Check out this map from the National Journal.
Labels:
elections,
politics,
Republicans
Kaiser hosting journalists-only web briefing on Nov. 13 to discuss ACA open enrollment period
The Kaiser Family Foundation is hosting a web briefing for journalists from 12:30-1:30 p.m. on Nov. 13 about covering federal health reform's second open enrollment period. Open enrollment begins on Nov. 15 and runs through Feb. 15, 2015. After a short presentation, the briefing will be open to questions from journalists.
Kasier said in a release: "This year's open enrollment season poses both new and recurring challenges for consumers: How are premiums for marketplace plans changing, and what do the changes mean for consumers? Why might current marketplace customers want to consider switching plans? For those new to insurance, how can they better understand and use their coverage? And how will the law's subsidies and coverage requirements affect consumers' 2014 and 2015 taxes? Again this year, local and national print, online, television and radio news outlets will play a major role in educating their audiences about how the law may affect them and what they can do about it." (Read more)
Kasier said in a release: "This year's open enrollment season poses both new and recurring challenges for consumers: How are premiums for marketplace plans changing, and what do the changes mean for consumers? Why might current marketplace customers want to consider switching plans? For those new to insurance, how can they better understand and use their coverage? And how will the law's subsidies and coverage requirements affect consumers' 2014 and 2015 taxes? Again this year, local and national print, online, television and radio news outlets will play a major role in educating their audiences about how the law may affect them and what they can do about it." (Read more)
Alaskans pass measure that could lead to restricting controversial Pebble Mine project
On Tuesday, Alaskans voted in favor of a measure that could lead to restricting the controversial Pebble Mine project. "Ballot Measure 4, which would enable the Alaska
Legislature to ban proposed mining in the Bristol Bay watershed if
lawmakers believe the project would endanger wild salmon stocks, passed
with 65 percent of votes in favor to 35 percent opposed," Sean Doogan reports for Alaska Dispatch News. "Currently, only state and federal agencies decide on mining permits.
"The measure adds another layer of oversight for the proposed Pebble mine," Doogan writes. "The mine site is near several Bristol Bay salmon streams that produce some of the largest runs of wild sockeye salmon in the world. In 2008, Alaska voters rejected an outright ban on large-scale mining in the Bristol Bay region. The Alaska Clean Water Initiative failed to pass with 43 percent of the vote." (Commercial Fishermen for Bristol Bay map)
In July the Environmental Protection Agency moved to block the project by "proposing tough new limits for gold and copper mining in the Bristol Bay watershed—a move that would greatly diminish the scale of the controversial Pebble Mine project," Linsdsay Abrams reports for Salon. While the move "won’t block the mine outright, it will effectively rob it of that largest-ever status, protecting Alaska’s important sockeye salmon fishery in the process."
"The measure adds another layer of oversight for the proposed Pebble mine," Doogan writes. "The mine site is near several Bristol Bay salmon streams that produce some of the largest runs of wild sockeye salmon in the world. In 2008, Alaska voters rejected an outright ban on large-scale mining in the Bristol Bay region. The Alaska Clean Water Initiative failed to pass with 43 percent of the vote." (Commercial Fishermen for Bristol Bay map)
In July the Environmental Protection Agency moved to block the project by "proposing tough new limits for gold and copper mining in the Bristol Bay watershed—a move that would greatly diminish the scale of the controversial Pebble Mine project," Linsdsay Abrams reports for Salon. While the move "won’t block the mine outright, it will effectively rob it of that largest-ever status, protecting Alaska’s important sockeye salmon fishery in the process."
Labels:
economy,
environment,
fishing,
jobs,
land use,
mining,
state government,
water pollution,
wetlands,
wildlife
Texas town sued for voting to ban fracking; case expected to reach state Supreme Court
Fracking advocates quickly responded to Tuesday's vote in Denton, Texas, banning the practice. By Wednesday morning "the Texas Oil and Gas Association and the Texas General
Land Office had filed lawsuits to prevent the city from enacting the
ordinance in 30 days," James Osborne and Marissa Barnett report for The Dallas Morning News. The case is expected to end up before the state Supreme Court.
"The question now is whether Texas, the unofficial home of the U.S. energy industry, will allow a town in one of its richest natural gas fields, the Barnett Shale, to buck the industry, Osborne and Barnett write. The lawsuits "argued that the ban was illegal under Texas law, which gives authority to the state not only to regulate the oil and gas industry but also to ensure resources are fully exploited." (Wikipedia map: Denton, Texas)
Tom Phillips, an attorney representing the oil and gas association and a former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Texas, told the Morning News, "No locality has the power to say this activity is not going to take place within our limits."
Similar arguments "have had mixed success in court in other states, attorneys say," Osborne and Barnett write. "New York’s highest court upheld municipalities’ ability to supercede state law and ban fracking. Colorado and West Virginia courts have ruled against such authority at the local level." (Read more)
"The question now is whether Texas, the unofficial home of the U.S. energy industry, will allow a town in one of its richest natural gas fields, the Barnett Shale, to buck the industry, Osborne and Barnett write. The lawsuits "argued that the ban was illegal under Texas law, which gives authority to the state not only to regulate the oil and gas industry but also to ensure resources are fully exploited." (Wikipedia map: Denton, Texas)
Tom Phillips, an attorney representing the oil and gas association and a former chief justice of the Supreme Court of Texas, told the Morning News, "No locality has the power to say this activity is not going to take place within our limits."
Similar arguments "have had mixed success in court in other states, attorneys say," Osborne and Barnett write. "New York’s highest court upheld municipalities’ ability to supercede state law and ban fracking. Colorado and West Virginia courts have ruled against such authority at the local level." (Read more)
Labels:
drilling,
elections,
energy,
environment,
fracking,
gas,
hydraulic fracturing,
oil,
voting
Wednesday, November 05, 2014
Republicans seize control of Senate after winning most of Tuesday's close races
"Republicans scored a stunning electoral rout in the midterm elections,
taking control of the U.S. Senate after a bitter campaign in which anger
at Washington gridlock was turned against a president who took office
promising to transcend it," David Fahrentold reports for The Washington Post.
"By early Wednesday, Republican candidates had won at least 10 of the day’s 13 closely contested Senate races," Fahrentold writes. "They took seats held by Democrats in Iowa, Colorado, Arkansas, Montana, South Dakota, West Virginia and North Carolina—more than enough to seize control of the Senate for the first time since 2007." Republicans also added at least 10 seats in the House. (Post map: To see updates click here)
Republicans credit much of their success to the public's dislike of President Obama, Fahrentold writes. "Nearly 6 in 10 voters said they were 'dissatisfied' or 'angry' at the Obama administration, the polls showed. A similar proportion felt the same about GOP leaders in Congress, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said Tuesday on MSNBC, “People see a Washington that isn’t working, and the person at the head of it all is the president.”
In what was anticipated to be a close race, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) had an easier time than expected earning his sixth term, garnering 56.2 percent of the votes to oust Democratic challenger Alison Lundergran Grimes, who received 40.7 percent of the vote. McConnell's victory, coupled with Republicans taking control of the Senate means McConnell will most likely be elevated to Senate Majority Leader.
In Kansas, the "Democratic surge that was supposed to end Republican control never happened," John Eligon reports for The New York Times. "Gov. Sam Brownback and Sen. Pat Roberts survived unusually close races to keep their seats on Tuesday, fortifying their party’s political grip on this plains state."
"Roberts, 78, who has served in Washington for more than three decades, fought back a chorus of anti-incumbent and anti-Washington sentiment," Eligon writes. Roberts, the ranking member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, received 53.2 percent of the vote, beating out Independent Greg Orman, who received 42.5 percent of the vote.
"By early Wednesday, Republican candidates had won at least 10 of the day’s 13 closely contested Senate races," Fahrentold writes. "They took seats held by Democrats in Iowa, Colorado, Arkansas, Montana, South Dakota, West Virginia and North Carolina—more than enough to seize control of the Senate for the first time since 2007." Republicans also added at least 10 seats in the House. (Post map: To see updates click here)
Republicans credit much of their success to the public's dislike of President Obama, Fahrentold writes. "Nearly 6 in 10 voters said they were 'dissatisfied' or 'angry' at the Obama administration, the polls showed. A similar proportion felt the same about GOP leaders in Congress, Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said Tuesday on MSNBC, “People see a Washington that isn’t working, and the person at the head of it all is the president.”
In what was anticipated to be a close race, Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) had an easier time than expected earning his sixth term, garnering 56.2 percent of the votes to oust Democratic challenger Alison Lundergran Grimes, who received 40.7 percent of the vote. McConnell's victory, coupled with Republicans taking control of the Senate means McConnell will most likely be elevated to Senate Majority Leader.
In Kansas, the "Democratic surge that was supposed to end Republican control never happened," John Eligon reports for The New York Times. "Gov. Sam Brownback and Sen. Pat Roberts survived unusually close races to keep their seats on Tuesday, fortifying their party’s political grip on this plains state."
"Roberts, 78, who has served in Washington for more than three decades, fought back a chorus of anti-incumbent and anti-Washington sentiment," Eligon writes. Roberts, the ranking member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, received 53.2 percent of the vote, beating out Independent Greg Orman, who received 42.5 percent of the vote.
Labels:
Congress,
elections,
government,
politics,
state government
Rural voters play a big role in midterms; Democrats suffer the consequences
Sen. Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), who was defeated in a Republican wave yesterday, said he wishes President Obama "were more in touch with rural America," Matt Barron writes for The Hill. The same can be said about Democrats in general. The Democrats' issues with rural people ranges "from recruiting poor candidates, not showing up in small towns to campaign, hiring urban-centric consultants who have no dirt under their nails to bad mapmaking as a result of the 2010 redistricting."
Democrats knew support of rural voters would be key this year. Even so, they fell short in important races. "Prior, who as chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee's spending panel on agriculture was in charge of writing the annual bill to fund popular programs such as broadband, rural development, research and extension, was dumped by a congressman who voted against the farm bill and disaster aid for tornado and flood-ravaged Arkansas towns," Barron reports.
In spite of Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke's plan to grow her state's rural economies are part of her agenda, she lost to the republican candidate. "The loss of majority-rural House seats also continues to haunt the Democrats," Barron writes. Aaron Woolf's issues with health code violations, problems with employee wages and "the fact that he seemed more city slicker than North Country doomed his bid to hold retiring Rep. Bill Owen's seat for the Democrats."
Democrats lost control of the state House in Minnesota, too. Nancy Larson, a former Democratic National Committee member, said, "Minnesota is doing great, but we're losing everybody in rural. Our message must not be connecting; people aren't connecting the dots." (Read more)
Democrats knew support of rural voters would be key this year. Even so, they fell short in important races. "Prior, who as chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee's spending panel on agriculture was in charge of writing the annual bill to fund popular programs such as broadband, rural development, research and extension, was dumped by a congressman who voted against the farm bill and disaster aid for tornado and flood-ravaged Arkansas towns," Barron reports.
In spite of Wisconsin Democratic gubernatorial candidate Mary Burke's plan to grow her state's rural economies are part of her agenda, she lost to the republican candidate. "The loss of majority-rural House seats also continues to haunt the Democrats," Barron writes. Aaron Woolf's issues with health code violations, problems with employee wages and "the fact that he seemed more city slicker than North Country doomed his bid to hold retiring Rep. Bill Owen's seat for the Democrats."
Democrats lost control of the state House in Minnesota, too. Nancy Larson, a former Democratic National Committee member, said, "Minnesota is doing great, but we're losing everybody in rural. Our message must not be connecting; people aren't connecting the dots." (Read more)
Oregon, Alaska, Washington D.C. vote to legalize pot; Florida rejects medical marijuana measure
Legalization of marijuana passed in Oregon, Alaska and Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, while voters in Florida shot down a measure to legalize medical marijuana.
About 70 percent of Washington D.C. voters backed Initiative 71, which would allow residents and visitors age 21 and older "to legally possess as much as two ounces of marijuana and to grow up to three marijuana plants at home," Aaron Davis reports for The Washington Post. "Leading candidates for mayor and the D.C. Council have vowed to quickly sign the measure into law. A majority of the council also pledged that if approved by voters, they would submit follow-up legislation to Congress next year establishing a system to sell and tax the drug in the District."
"The twin measures will become law, as District bills do, unless Congress vetoes them and the president agrees that the local measures should be halted," Davis writes. "That complex layer of federal oversight could thrust Congress and President Obama into the middle of a rapidly evolving national debate." (Post photo by Michael Williamson: Advocates for legalized marijuana in Washington D.C.)
In Oregon, marijuana will become legal for recreational use on July 1, 2015, Noelle Crombie reports for The Oregonian. Beginning July 1, "people 21 and older will be allowed to possess up to 1 ounce of marijuana in a public place and up to 8 ounces in their home. The law also allows up to four marijuana plants per household."
The Alaskan measure passed by a narrow 52 to 48 percent vote, Suzanna Caldwell and Laurel Andrews report for Alaska Dispatch News. "The initiative will not become law until 90 days after the election is certified, which is expected to be in late November. Per the law, the state can then create a marijuana control board—expected to be housed under the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development. That group will then have nine months to craft regulations dealing with how marijuana businesses will operate."
A "proposed constitutional amendment to make Florida the 24th state and the first in the South to allow medical marijuana was defeated after falling short of the 60 percent support needed to pass, according to groups both for and against the measure," Shelby Sebens reports for Reuters.
About 70 percent of Washington D.C. voters backed Initiative 71, which would allow residents and visitors age 21 and older "to legally possess as much as two ounces of marijuana and to grow up to three marijuana plants at home," Aaron Davis reports for The Washington Post. "Leading candidates for mayor and the D.C. Council have vowed to quickly sign the measure into law. A majority of the council also pledged that if approved by voters, they would submit follow-up legislation to Congress next year establishing a system to sell and tax the drug in the District."
"The twin measures will become law, as District bills do, unless Congress vetoes them and the president agrees that the local measures should be halted," Davis writes. "That complex layer of federal oversight could thrust Congress and President Obama into the middle of a rapidly evolving national debate." (Post photo by Michael Williamson: Advocates for legalized marijuana in Washington D.C.)
In Oregon, marijuana will become legal for recreational use on July 1, 2015, Noelle Crombie reports for The Oregonian. Beginning July 1, "people 21 and older will be allowed to possess up to 1 ounce of marijuana in a public place and up to 8 ounces in their home. The law also allows up to four marijuana plants per household."
The Alaskan measure passed by a narrow 52 to 48 percent vote, Suzanna Caldwell and Laurel Andrews report for Alaska Dispatch News. "The initiative will not become law until 90 days after the election is certified, which is expected to be in late November. Per the law, the state can then create a marijuana control board—expected to be housed under the Department of Commerce, Community and Economic Development. That group will then have nine months to craft regulations dealing with how marijuana businesses will operate."
A "proposed constitutional amendment to make Florida the 24th state and the first in the South to allow medical marijuana was defeated after falling short of the 60 percent support needed to pass, according to groups both for and against the measure," Shelby Sebens reports for Reuters.
Record grain crops could lead to lower prices and force more farmers to store corn and soybeans
Not many farmers are happy about this year's projected record-breaking grain harvest. That's because supply is expected to far outweigh demand, meaning that already falling prices could continue to drop, Grant Gerlock reports for NPR. Prices for a bushel of corn are already under $4, about half of prices from two years ago. And it doesn't look like prices will see an upturn any time soon. (Getty Images by Daniel Acker: Grain stored in Sheffield, Ill.)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture expects farmers to haul in 4 billion bushels of soybeans and 14.5 billion bushels of corn this harvest, Gerlock writes. Farmer Gene Trausch told Gerlock, "We out-produced ourselves. You always hope your neighbor burns up, hails out, whatever, dries up, but you have a good crop. You know, that's just the way it works. But everybody had a good crop this year."
That could lead to the lowest prices in five years, Gerlock writes. Add in rail delays, blamed on increased shipments of oil and last year's bad winter, and farmers will need to store grains. That creates a new set of problems because farmers who lack enough storage space are forced to store grain on the ground, risking its spoiling.
Trausch said many farmers are being forced to tighten their belts and save money, Gerlock writes. Trausch told him, "It's going to hurt. Because the store fronts in town like in Minden, Kearney, Hastings, Grand Island, wherever—they're going to be hurting. And then also, your implement dealers. They're just not going to sell nothing." John Deere has already been affected, saying it plans to layoff 1,000 workers at plants in Iowa. (Read more)
The U.S. Department of Agriculture expects farmers to haul in 4 billion bushels of soybeans and 14.5 billion bushels of corn this harvest, Gerlock writes. Farmer Gene Trausch told Gerlock, "We out-produced ourselves. You always hope your neighbor burns up, hails out, whatever, dries up, but you have a good crop. You know, that's just the way it works. But everybody had a good crop this year."
That could lead to the lowest prices in five years, Gerlock writes. Add in rail delays, blamed on increased shipments of oil and last year's bad winter, and farmers will need to store grains. That creates a new set of problems because farmers who lack enough storage space are forced to store grain on the ground, risking its spoiling.
Trausch said many farmers are being forced to tighten their belts and save money, Gerlock writes. Trausch told him, "It's going to hurt. Because the store fronts in town like in Minden, Kearney, Hastings, Grand Island, wherever—they're going to be hurting. And then also, your implement dealers. They're just not going to sell nothing." John Deere has already been affected, saying it plans to layoff 1,000 workers at plants in Iowa. (Read more)
Labels:
agriculture,
corn,
cotton,
crop prices,
crops,
farmers,
food,
grain,
soybeans
A tale of two Democratic representatives: Peterson narrowly wins in Minn.; Rahall loses in W.Va.
One long-serving Democrat survived the GOP-dominance at the polls on Tuesday, while voters ousted another. Rep. Collin Peterson (D-Minn.) narrowly won his 13th-term, while Rep. Nick Rahall (D-W.Va.) was defeated after serving for 38 years. Peterson's work with the Farm Bill likely led to his victory, while coal advocates played a significant role in defeating Rahall.
Peterson fought off state Sen. Torrey Westrom "in a race too close to call until well after midnight," Allison Sherry reports for the Star Tribune. "In the Seventh District, which hugs the state’s western flank down the North and South Dakota borders, the district has swayed more red than blue in other contests: Voters reliably prefer the Republican nominee for president and governor but keep sending Peterson, who votes with the Democrats only 68 percent of the time, back to Washington."
When votes were finally tallied on Wednesday morning, Peterson had 54.2 percent of the vote, and Westrom had 45.7 percent, Sherry writes. "Peterson was helped because of his status as the most powerful Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee. He is responsible for a number of components in the farm bill that benefited local farmers—especially sugar beet operations." (Star Tribune photo by David Joles: Peterson gets a hug from wife Mary after winning re-election)
In a state where the coal business has been depleted, Rep. Rahall, "who represents the reddest district of any House Democrat, touted his seniority in Congress and his independence from party leadership," Tarini Parti reports for Politico. "The incumbent has defied political calculus and served in Congress for more than three decades in a district former GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney won by 33 points."
But tides turned during this year's election. Rahall only received 45 percent of the vote, while challenger Evan Jenkins received 55 percent of the vote, Parti writes. "Republicans repeatedly tied Rahall to President Barack Obama and the administration’s energy policies, which are highly unpopular in the coal-friendly state. They flooded the airwaves attacking Rahall for going against the interests of the district." While Democrats said that wouldn't be an issue in the race, Rahall, who voted in favor of federal health reform, was soundly defeated. (Read more)
Peterson fought off state Sen. Torrey Westrom "in a race too close to call until well after midnight," Allison Sherry reports for the Star Tribune. "In the Seventh District, which hugs the state’s western flank down the North and South Dakota borders, the district has swayed more red than blue in other contests: Voters reliably prefer the Republican nominee for president and governor but keep sending Peterson, who votes with the Democrats only 68 percent of the time, back to Washington."
When votes were finally tallied on Wednesday morning, Peterson had 54.2 percent of the vote, and Westrom had 45.7 percent, Sherry writes. "Peterson was helped because of his status as the most powerful Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee. He is responsible for a number of components in the farm bill that benefited local farmers—especially sugar beet operations." (Star Tribune photo by David Joles: Peterson gets a hug from wife Mary after winning re-election)
In a state where the coal business has been depleted, Rep. Rahall, "who represents the reddest district of any House Democrat, touted his seniority in Congress and his independence from party leadership," Tarini Parti reports for Politico. "The incumbent has defied political calculus and served in Congress for more than three decades in a district former GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney won by 33 points."
But tides turned during this year's election. Rahall only received 45 percent of the vote, while challenger Evan Jenkins received 55 percent of the vote, Parti writes. "Republicans repeatedly tied Rahall to President Barack Obama and the administration’s energy policies, which are highly unpopular in the coal-friendly state. They flooded the airwaves attacking Rahall for going against the interests of the district." While Democrats said that wouldn't be an issue in the race, Rahall, who voted in favor of federal health reform, was soundly defeated. (Read more)
Labels:
Appalachia,
coal,
elections,
Farm Bill,
politics
Denton, Texas, and Athens, Ohio, voters ban fracking; measures shot down in three Ohio towns
Voters in Denton, Texas, and Athens, Ohio, approved fracking bans on Tuesday, while similar measures were shot down in Ohio towns Gates Mills, Kent and Youngstown. A fracking ban was also passed in San Benito County, California. Fracking bans were leading in Mendocino County, California, but appeared to be defeated in Santa Barbara County. Fracking is not currently taking place in any of those three counties, and no oil producers have as yet expressed interest in doing so.
Nearly 59 percent of voters in Denton voted in favor of the measure, making the town of 123,000 the first in the state to ban fracking, Jim Malewitz reports for The Texas Tribune. "The ban’s passage will almost certainly trigger litigation,
with energy companies and royalty owners arguing that state drilling
regulations trump Denton’s and that the city was confiscating mineral
rights, which have long been dominant in Texas law." (KERA News photo: Voters in Denton, Texas)
"The Denton measure does not technically prohibit drilling outright; it would apply only to fracking, which involves blasting apart rock with millions of gallons of chemical-laced water hauled in by trucks," Malewitz writes. "But opponents of the ban say it would make gas beneath the city too difficult to profitably tap–amounting to a drilling ban."
Ohio "sits on top of the Utica Shale formation, where natural gas production has grown eightfold since January 2012, to 1.3 billion cubic feet a day as of September, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration," Dan Molinski and Leslie Eaton report for The Wall Street Journal. "Proponents of the local Ohio proposals argue that fracking in residential areas could cause health problems and taint drinking water supplies. Opponents, including the oil and gas industry and some local government and union officials, have said the proposals are too broad and could hurt job growth."
Early returns had the fracking ban in Mendocino County receiving 64 percent of the vote and on its way to passing, Adam Randall reports for the Daily Journal News. As of 10:30 p.m. local time, the measure had 5,254 voters who said yes and 2,958 voters who said no.
In San Benito County the measure passed with 5,021 yes votes and 3,733 no votes, a margin of 57.3 percent to 42.6 percent, reports Action News 8. While in Santa Barbara County, 44,131 voters—or 60.7 percent of votes tallied—were against the ban, while 28,555 votes—or 39.3 percent—favored the ban, Mike Hodgson reports for the Lompoc Record.
"The Denton measure does not technically prohibit drilling outright; it would apply only to fracking, which involves blasting apart rock with millions of gallons of chemical-laced water hauled in by trucks," Malewitz writes. "But opponents of the ban say it would make gas beneath the city too difficult to profitably tap–amounting to a drilling ban."
Ohio "sits on top of the Utica Shale formation, where natural gas production has grown eightfold since January 2012, to 1.3 billion cubic feet a day as of September, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration," Dan Molinski and Leslie Eaton report for The Wall Street Journal. "Proponents of the local Ohio proposals argue that fracking in residential areas could cause health problems and taint drinking water supplies. Opponents, including the oil and gas industry and some local government and union officials, have said the proposals are too broad and could hurt job growth."
Early returns had the fracking ban in Mendocino County receiving 64 percent of the vote and on its way to passing, Adam Randall reports for the Daily Journal News. As of 10:30 p.m. local time, the measure had 5,254 voters who said yes and 2,958 voters who said no.
In San Benito County the measure passed with 5,021 yes votes and 3,733 no votes, a margin of 57.3 percent to 42.6 percent, reports Action News 8. While in Santa Barbara County, 44,131 voters—or 60.7 percent of votes tallied—were against the ban, while 28,555 votes—or 39.3 percent—favored the ban, Mike Hodgson reports for the Lompoc Record.
Labels:
drilling,
elections,
energy,
environment,
fracking,
gas,
hydraulic fracturing,
oil,
voting
Tuesday, November 04, 2014
Rural food pantries are struggling to stock shelves, as more rural residents seek help
High poverty rates are bringing more rural Americans to the local food pantry, but some rural areas with sparse populations are struggling to find enough donations to fill the growing need to fight hunger, especially now that winter is quickly approaching.
That's the case in rural Wisconsin, where the number of visitors to Community Center of Hope in Marathon County (Wikipedia map) has jumped 12 percent since last year, Alison Dirr reports for the Wausau Daily Herald. The pantry had more than 540 client visits in October, the highest number executive director Mary Pat Campbell has seen.
It's the same throughout much of the region, Dirr writes. JoAnn Janikowski, community impact director at United Way of Marathon County, told Dirr, "All of the pantries have been strained at probably a similar level. But when you look at rural pantries, when you think about sparser populations—you have fewer people to donate; you might have higher poverty levels; there is less industry to provide food donations; the media market might be smaller in those areas, so the word of need doesn't get out. They just have some unique challenges the urban pantries might not."
The result is that places like the Community Center of Hope have had to be more strict with supplies, Dirr writes. "Campbell said such things as toothbrushes and shampoo have moved from a take-as-needed system to the 'weighed' shelves: A single person can take 10 pounds of items from those shelves, and every additional person in a family gets four additional pounds, she said. Eggs, which she tries to stock because they are a versatile source of protein, might be moved to the weigh shelf next."
Campbell has a budget of less than $70,000 per year, which has to be used for food, insurance, rent, payroll, a telephone and other expenses such as trash and snow removal, Dirr writes. "The pantry does receive donations from local businesses, churches and other groups. But in a rural area, there are just fewer sources for donations, and it's getting harder to supply enough food for growing numbers of clients, she said." (Read more)
That's the case in rural Wisconsin, where the number of visitors to Community Center of Hope in Marathon County (Wikipedia map) has jumped 12 percent since last year, Alison Dirr reports for the Wausau Daily Herald. The pantry had more than 540 client visits in October, the highest number executive director Mary Pat Campbell has seen.
It's the same throughout much of the region, Dirr writes. JoAnn Janikowski, community impact director at United Way of Marathon County, told Dirr, "All of the pantries have been strained at probably a similar level. But when you look at rural pantries, when you think about sparser populations—you have fewer people to donate; you might have higher poverty levels; there is less industry to provide food donations; the media market might be smaller in those areas, so the word of need doesn't get out. They just have some unique challenges the urban pantries might not."
The result is that places like the Community Center of Hope have had to be more strict with supplies, Dirr writes. "Campbell said such things as toothbrushes and shampoo have moved from a take-as-needed system to the 'weighed' shelves: A single person can take 10 pounds of items from those shelves, and every additional person in a family gets four additional pounds, she said. Eggs, which she tries to stock because they are a versatile source of protein, might be moved to the weigh shelf next."
Campbell has a budget of less than $70,000 per year, which has to be used for food, insurance, rent, payroll, a telephone and other expenses such as trash and snow removal, Dirr writes. "The pantry does receive donations from local businesses, churches and other groups. But in a rural area, there are just fewer sources for donations, and it's getting harder to supply enough food for growing numbers of clients, she said." (Read more)
Labels:
food,
food banks,
hunger,
poverty,
rural-urban disparities
Heirloom crops, a staple of Appalachia, face an uncertain future
![]() |
| Todd photo: Bloody Butcher Corn |
"The heritage seeds central to this 'agrobiodiversity' have been passed down through generations of families," Todd writes. "In many cases, the seeds date back hundreds of years to when Native Americans were cultivating seeds from woodland plants like pawpaws. Other crops like corn traveled to Appalachia from southern Mexico via the Southwest U.S."
With the future of its rich history in doubt, advocates have stepped in to try to save heirloom crops, Todd writes. One such person is James Veteto, an anthropologist at Western Carolina University and an apple farmer who directs the Southern Seed Legacy Project. For the past 16 years, Veteto has traveled throughout Central and Southern Appalachia, talking with farmers about the heritage fruits and vegetables they grow. But he says "most of the dedicated seed savers in Appalachia are aging, so there isn't much time left to help farmers keep cultivating these valuable antique seeds."
"Preserving a food that is more in demand means preserving farming with heirloom seeds," Todd writes. "Veteto says that will require a new generation of farmers taking an interest in these small, niche markets and finding ways to protect the heritage seeds from becoming eclipsed by large-scale, genetically modified and hybrid crops." (Read more)
Labels:
agriculture,
Appalachia,
crops,
farming,
food,
fruit,
local food,
seed
Hunter killed by combine while walking on rural road; safety always a good topic of conversation
Rural road safety is always a good topic of discussion, especially during hunting season when more pedestrians could be walking on or near roads. This was the case on Saturday in rural Illinois when suburban Chicago hunter David Olzeski was struck and killed by a combine while walking with traffic in Forreston (Best Places map), Christi Warren reports for SaukValley.com, which covers Northern Illinois.
Although about 19 percent of the U.S. population lives in rural areas, 55 percent of highway deaths occur in rural areas, says the Center for Excellence in Rural Safety at the University of Minnesota. In 27 states more than 75 percent of roads are in rural areas, while 42 states have at least 50 percent of roads classified as rural. The fatality rate per 100 million miles traveled is 2.5 times higher in rural areas, compared to urban ones. (Read more)
Although about 19 percent of the U.S. population lives in rural areas, 55 percent of highway deaths occur in rural areas, says the Center for Excellence in Rural Safety at the University of Minnesota. In 27 states more than 75 percent of roads are in rural areas, while 42 states have at least 50 percent of roads classified as rural. The fatality rate per 100 million miles traveled is 2.5 times higher in rural areas, compared to urban ones. (Read more)
Labels:
accidents,
highway safety,
highways,
public safety,
roads,
rural-urban disparities
States fighting California's ban on eggs from hens kept in cramped cages; say conforming too costly
Five states—Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Alabama and Kentucky—are challenging a California ban on the sale of eggs from hens kept in cramped cages, Marsha Mercer reports for Stateline. The states "filed a notice Oct. 24 that they will appeal a U.S. district court’s
dismissal of their case. They had argued that the law forces farmers in
other states to make costly changes in their operations and violates the
U.S. Constitution."
"In 2008, California voters approved a ballot initiative prohibiting the state’s farmers from confining hens in a way that prevents them from turning around freely, lying down, standing up and fully extending their limbs," Mercer writes. "Two years later, California lawmakers banned the sale of eggs—from any state—that have been produced by hens in conventional or 'battery' cages."
"Battery cages provide each hen an average of only 67 square inches of floor space, smaller than an 8x10 sheet of paper," Mercer writes. "The 2010 law, which goes into effect Jan.1, cites the increased risk of salmonella from birds in large flocks in confined spaces."
About 95 percent of U.S. eggs are produced in battery cages, Mercer writes. States argue that complying with the ban would be costly—Missouri would need to spend more than $120 million for new henhouses to comply with California's law—and that consumers should be free to make their own decisions on what eggs to buy. Critics also say the ban will increase egg costs for consumers. (Read more)
"In 2008, California voters approved a ballot initiative prohibiting the state’s farmers from confining hens in a way that prevents them from turning around freely, lying down, standing up and fully extending their limbs," Mercer writes. "Two years later, California lawmakers banned the sale of eggs—from any state—that have been produced by hens in conventional or 'battery' cages."
"Battery cages provide each hen an average of only 67 square inches of floor space, smaller than an 8x10 sheet of paper," Mercer writes. "The 2010 law, which goes into effect Jan.1, cites the increased risk of salmonella from birds in large flocks in confined spaces."
About 95 percent of U.S. eggs are produced in battery cages, Mercer writes. States argue that complying with the ban would be costly—Missouri would need to spend more than $120 million for new henhouses to comply with California's law—and that consumers should be free to make their own decisions on what eggs to buy. Critics also say the ban will increase egg costs for consumers. (Read more)
Labels:
agriculture,
animal disease,
animal welfare,
eggs,
farming,
poultry
Florida-Georgia water war reaches Supreme Court; Florida says Georgia overusing water
The long-running water-use dispute between Florida and Georgia has reached the U.S. Supreme Court, Bill Cotterell reports for Reuters. The court "agreed on Monday to
hear an interstate dispute on whether Atlanta's suburbs are sucking dry the river flow that feeds the oyster beds and fisheries of the northern
Gulf Coast."
"Georgia had sought to dismiss the suit, filed last October by Florida Gov. Rick Scott, that stems from a decades-old fight over Atlanta's daily demand for 360 million gallons of water from the Chattahoochee and Flint river basins," Cotterell writes. "Florida blames the over-consumption of water by its neighbor for the collapse of the oyster beds in Apalachicola Bay, which had produced 90 percent of the oysters sold in Florida and 10 percent of the country’s supply." (Economist photo)
Florida argues that the growing population of Atlanta will lead to Georgia’s daily consumption of water growing to 705 million gallons per day by 2035, Cottrell writes. Scott said in a statement: "We are fighting for the future of this region, and we won’t quit until these resources are restored."
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal "issued a statement saying he agreed with attorneys for the Army Corps of Engineers, who argued that Florida’s case was 'premature,'” Cottrell writes. Deal urged the federal government not to "get bogged down by Florida’s litigation." (Read more)
"Georgia had sought to dismiss the suit, filed last October by Florida Gov. Rick Scott, that stems from a decades-old fight over Atlanta's daily demand for 360 million gallons of water from the Chattahoochee and Flint river basins," Cotterell writes. "Florida blames the over-consumption of water by its neighbor for the collapse of the oyster beds in Apalachicola Bay, which had produced 90 percent of the oysters sold in Florida and 10 percent of the country’s supply." (Economist photo)
Florida argues that the growing population of Atlanta will lead to Georgia’s daily consumption of water growing to 705 million gallons per day by 2035, Cottrell writes. Scott said in a statement: "We are fighting for the future of this region, and we won’t quit until these resources are restored."
Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal "issued a statement saying he agreed with attorneys for the Army Corps of Engineers, who argued that Florida’s case was 'premature,'” Cottrell writes. Deal urged the federal government not to "get bogged down by Florida’s litigation." (Read more)
Labels:
conservation,
courts,
disasters,
economy,
environment,
fishing,
jobs,
politics,
state governments,
water
Monday, November 03, 2014
Deadly gas on the rise in oil fields; more residents complaining of 'sour gas' smell
Deadly gas is on the rise in oil fields, and more and more residents are complaining of a "sour gas" smell, Mike Lee reports for Environment and Energy News. "Neither the states nor
the federal government tracks the amount of hydrogen sulfide production,
but complaints and permitting related to hydrogen sulfide are growing
in four states, according to documents and interviews. The gas is deadly in small amounts. It can stop a person's breathing
at a concentration of 500 parts per million and render people
unconscious within seconds at 700 parts per million."
"There's a catch, too: As the concentration increases, the gas deadens people's sense of smell, making it hard for them to detect the danger. And if that's not enough, it can corrode steel and iron," Lee writes. "It has killed at least five oil field workers since the beginning of 2013 and in 1975 was responsible for one of the worst oil field accidents ever." (Lee photo: A sign on an oilfield tank battery in Odessa, Texas, warns workers to use gas masks)
Lee's story is part of a series called "Danger Zone," which also looked at whether chemicals played a role in oil tank deaths, the high rate of oil and gas worker deaths and how more oil and gas workers die in fires and explosions than any other private industry.
Comparing the rates of deadly gas among the states is difficult because each state keeps different records, Lee writes. In 2013, Kansas regulators received 15 requests to flare gas containing hydrogen sulfide, up from three in 2012 and none in 2009 to 2011.
"Oklahoma regulators calculated that oil and gas operators emitted 594 tons of hydrogen sulfide in 2011 and are planning to do more monitoring of air emissions overall," Lee writes. "In New Mexico, which shares patches of the sour gas-producing Permian Basin with Texas, state officials received reports of five hydrogen sulfide releases in 2013 after receiving none in 2012 and four in 2011."
"Texas tracks the amount of gas produced in fields that also have hydrogen sulfide although it doesn't track the actual amounts of hydrogen sulfide, and not all of the gas produced in those fields is sour," Lee writes. "The amount of gas from hydrogen sulfide-containing fields rose 48 percent over five years, from 1.2 trillion cubic feet in 2009 to 1.7 trillion cubic feet. The state requires special permits for oil wells, pipelines and processing plants that handle gas containing more than 100 parts per million of hydrogen sulfide. The state issued 6,906 of the permits in 2013, up 63 percent from the 4,233 it issued in 2009." (Read more)
"There's a catch, too: As the concentration increases, the gas deadens people's sense of smell, making it hard for them to detect the danger. And if that's not enough, it can corrode steel and iron," Lee writes. "It has killed at least five oil field workers since the beginning of 2013 and in 1975 was responsible for one of the worst oil field accidents ever." (Lee photo: A sign on an oilfield tank battery in Odessa, Texas, warns workers to use gas masks)
Lee's story is part of a series called "Danger Zone," which also looked at whether chemicals played a role in oil tank deaths, the high rate of oil and gas worker deaths and how more oil and gas workers die in fires and explosions than any other private industry.
Comparing the rates of deadly gas among the states is difficult because each state keeps different records, Lee writes. In 2013, Kansas regulators received 15 requests to flare gas containing hydrogen sulfide, up from three in 2012 and none in 2009 to 2011.
"Oklahoma regulators calculated that oil and gas operators emitted 594 tons of hydrogen sulfide in 2011 and are planning to do more monitoring of air emissions overall," Lee writes. "In New Mexico, which shares patches of the sour gas-producing Permian Basin with Texas, state officials received reports of five hydrogen sulfide releases in 2013 after receiving none in 2012 and four in 2011."
"Texas tracks the amount of gas produced in fields that also have hydrogen sulfide although it doesn't track the actual amounts of hydrogen sulfide, and not all of the gas produced in those fields is sour," Lee writes. "The amount of gas from hydrogen sulfide-containing fields rose 48 percent over five years, from 1.2 trillion cubic feet in 2009 to 1.7 trillion cubic feet. The state requires special permits for oil wells, pipelines and processing plants that handle gas containing more than 100 parts per million of hydrogen sulfide. The state issued 6,906 of the permits in 2013, up 63 percent from the 4,233 it issued in 2009." (Read more)
Labels:
chemicals,
drilling,
fracking,
gas,
hydraulic fracturing,
oil,
public safety,
workplace safety
Non-metro unemployment rate dropped from 6.9 percent to 5.6 percent over last year
The U.S. unemployment rate dropped from September 2013 to September 2014, falling from 6.9 percent to 5.6 percent in micropolitan counties—non-metro
counties with towns that have between 10,000 and 50,000 residents—while the metro unemployment rated dropped from 7 percent to 5.8 percent, Bill Bishop reports for the Daily Yonder.
"Nearly six out of 10 metropolitan and rural counties had unemployment rates in September that were below the national average of 5.7 percent," Bishop writes. "Moreover, 57 percent of rural residents lived in a county where the local unemployment rate matched or was lower than the national average in September." The eight counties with the lowest unemployment rates were all rural North Dakota counties in the heart of the oil and gas boom. (Read more) (Yonder map)
"Nearly six out of 10 metropolitan and rural counties had unemployment rates in September that were below the national average of 5.7 percent," Bishop writes. "Moreover, 57 percent of rural residents lived in a county where the local unemployment rate matched or was lower than the national average in September." The eight counties with the lowest unemployment rates were all rural North Dakota counties in the heart of the oil and gas boom. (Read more) (Yonder map)
Labels:
employment,
jobs,
rural-urban disparities,
unemployment
Decline in public seed supply having negative impact on farmers, study says
Consolidation in the seed industry has had a negative impact on the development of new varieties, limited farmer choice and decreased the genetic diversity of our global seed supply, says a report by the National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition published by the Rural Advancement Foundation International, reports Agri-Pulse, a Washington newsletter. (RAFI graphic)
Concerns expressed in the report are: farmers' limited access to seed, the narrowing of our country's agricultural plant and animal genetic diversity, consolidation within the seed industry, the decline in public cultivar development and how these trends are affecting farmers' abilities to confront the unprecedented challenges of climate change and global food security.
Juli Obudzinski, Senior Policy Specialist with the coalition, told Agri-Pulse, "Over the past 25 years, there has been a steady decline in investment in public sector breeding programs housed primarily within our nation's land grant university system and USDA research facilities. This slow atrophy of public funding to support improved plant varieties means that farmers have been left with fewer and fewer seed choices over the years and are ill-prepared to meet 21st century needs.” (Read more)
Concerns expressed in the report are: farmers' limited access to seed, the narrowing of our country's agricultural plant and animal genetic diversity, consolidation within the seed industry, the decline in public cultivar development and how these trends are affecting farmers' abilities to confront the unprecedented challenges of climate change and global food security.
Juli Obudzinski, Senior Policy Specialist with the coalition, told Agri-Pulse, "Over the past 25 years, there has been a steady decline in investment in public sector breeding programs housed primarily within our nation's land grant university system and USDA research facilities. This slow atrophy of public funding to support improved plant varieties means that farmers have been left with fewer and fewer seed choices over the years and are ill-prepared to meet 21st century needs.” (Read more)
Labels:
agriculture,
farmers,
food,
seed
Texas, Ohio towns, California counties to vote on fracking bans during Tuesday's election
Voters in five towns in Texas and Ohio and three counties in California will have the opportunity to voice their support or opposition to hydraulic fracturing during Tuesday's elections, reports Zahra Hirji for InsideClimate News. Fracking initiatives are on the ballot in Denton, Texas; in Ohio in Athens, Gates Mills, Kent and Youngstown; and in California counties Santa Barbara, San Benito and Mendocino.
Denton, a rapidly growing town with a population of 123,000, could be the first Texas town to ban fracking. Denton, which has an estimated 270 wells, became the center of controversy last year when residents blamed respiratory problems on fracking fumes, James Osborne reports for The Dallas Morning News. City officials enacted rules restricting drilling activity within 1,200 feet of homes, but the driller argued successfully in court it did not apply to existing wells.
Fracking opponents "collected 2,000 signatures, forcing the City Council to either ban fracking inside the city limits or put it to voters. In July, the council voted 5-2 for a referendum," Osborne writes. Since then, money has been pouring in from the oil and gas industry, with Denton Taxpayers for a Strong Economy, the leading group opposing the ban, having "raised almost $700,000 since July, almost all of which came from energy companies including Chevron, XTO Energy and Chesapeake Energy."
The same thing has happened in California, where "Chevron, ExxonMobil and other oil companies have donated about $7 million to try to defeat the fracking bans in Santa Barbara, San Benito and Monterey counties," Ellen Knickmeyer reports for The Associated Press. "In Santa Barbara and San Benito counties, the ballot measures would ban not only fracking but one of the most commonly used drilling methods in the state, steam injection."
Colorado Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, who has said he will do whatever it takes to beat anti-fracking initiatives, in August reached a compromise on local control of oil and gas drilling to remove all the initiatives on the issue from the November ballot. But anti-fracking initiatives remain on the ballots for the three Colorado towns.
Denton, a rapidly growing town with a population of 123,000, could be the first Texas town to ban fracking. Denton, which has an estimated 270 wells, became the center of controversy last year when residents blamed respiratory problems on fracking fumes, James Osborne reports for The Dallas Morning News. City officials enacted rules restricting drilling activity within 1,200 feet of homes, but the driller argued successfully in court it did not apply to existing wells.
Fracking opponents "collected 2,000 signatures, forcing the City Council to either ban fracking inside the city limits or put it to voters. In July, the council voted 5-2 for a referendum," Osborne writes. Since then, money has been pouring in from the oil and gas industry, with Denton Taxpayers for a Strong Economy, the leading group opposing the ban, having "raised almost $700,000 since July, almost all of which came from energy companies including Chevron, XTO Energy and Chesapeake Energy."
The same thing has happened in California, where "Chevron, ExxonMobil and other oil companies have donated about $7 million to try to defeat the fracking bans in Santa Barbara, San Benito and Monterey counties," Ellen Knickmeyer reports for The Associated Press. "In Santa Barbara and San Benito counties, the ballot measures would ban not only fracking but one of the most commonly used drilling methods in the state, steam injection."
Colorado Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper, who has said he will do whatever it takes to beat anti-fracking initiatives, in August reached a compromise on local control of oil and gas drilling to remove all the initiatives on the issue from the November ballot. But anti-fracking initiatives remain on the ballots for the three Colorado towns.
Labels:
elections,
energy,
environment,
fracking,
gas,
hydraulic fracturing,
local government,
oil,
referenda
Audit finds that USDA rural outreach program funds aren't being used properly
StrikeForce, a U.S. Department of Agriculture rural development program that gives millions to assist farmers, ranchers and forest owners in persistent poverty areas, "selected participants with 'questionable
qualifications' and then didn’t perform the necessary legwork to see
whether the groups did what they were supposed to, according to a federal audit," Chris Adams reports for McClatchy Newspapers.
Three of the four organizations audited—in Arkansas, Georgia and Mississippi—“had little to no experience with either USDA programs or with performing outreach activities,” Adams writes. One organization, the report said, “had no experience with agriculture, USDA or the type of outreach activities needed” and “was not qualified to accomplish the goals” of the program.
Instead of using money to promote USDA programs, one organization used funds to maintain school gardens, build a greenhouse and conduct cooking classes, which are all unrelated to the program's specific goals, Adams writes.
"The USDA, in responses to the inspector general, said it was working to address the problems although the inspector general in some instances said it was not yet satisfied with the department’s proposed solutions," Adams writes. "The inspector general made 13 recommendations; the department responded to all 13 but in four cases was told by the inspector general 'we do not accept management decision.'”
More than 700 areas participate in the StrikeForce effort. Involved states include Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and West Virginia. (Read more)
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/10/31/245346/usda-mismanaged-rural-outreach.html#storylink=cp
Three of the four organizations audited—in Arkansas, Georgia and Mississippi—“had little to no experience with either USDA programs or with performing outreach activities,” Adams writes. One organization, the report said, “had no experience with agriculture, USDA or the type of outreach activities needed” and “was not qualified to accomplish the goals” of the program.
Instead of using money to promote USDA programs, one organization used funds to maintain school gardens, build a greenhouse and conduct cooking classes, which are all unrelated to the program's specific goals, Adams writes.
"The USDA, in responses to the inspector general, said it was working to address the problems although the inspector general in some instances said it was not yet satisfied with the department’s proposed solutions," Adams writes. "The inspector general made 13 recommendations; the department responded to all 13 but in four cases was told by the inspector general 'we do not accept management decision.'”
More than 700 areas participate in the StrikeForce effort. Involved states include Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia and West Virginia. (Read more)
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2014/10/31/245346/usda-mismanaged-rural-outreach.html#storylink=cp
Labels:
agriculture,
farmers,
forests,
poverty,
ranchers,
rural-urban disparities,
USDA
Mountaintop removal endangering salamander species native to Central Appalachia
Mountaintop removal in Appalachia is endangering the region's freshwater species, especially the five salamander species native to the area, says a study by the University of Kentucky, Richard Conniff reports for TakePart. Researchers compared the number of salamanders downstream from mountaintop removal sites with the number of salamanders in undisturbed areas. They found 97 salamanders in 11 streams with mountain rubble and 807 in a dozen control
streams. (Christian Oldham photo: Red salamander)
Tierra Curry, a senior scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity, told Conniff, “It makes sense that amphibians would be very sensitive to the water pollution from surface coal mining. It increases the saltiness of the water; it puts metals into the water.” (Read more)
Tierra Curry, a senior scientist at the Center for Biological Diversity, told Conniff, “It makes sense that amphibians would be very sensitive to the water pollution from surface coal mining. It increases the saltiness of the water; it puts metals into the water.” (Read more)
Labels:
animal welfare,
Appalachia,
coal,
mountaintop removal,
pollution,
water pollution
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



























