The merger would have 'nearly doubled Kroger's store count.' (Kroger and Albertsons graphics) |
The ruling is a victory for FTC Chair Lina Khan, "who has waged legal battles
to stop megadeals rather than accept companies’ proposed fixes to
address competition concerns," Michaels and Thomas write.
Kroger and Albertsons executives marketed the deal as a necessary move to
compete with Walmart and Amazon.
Nelson's ruling cited the fierce "head-to-head competition" between
Kroger and Albertsons, which the proposed merger "would have removed."
Michaels and Thomas write, "An FTC spokesman said the ruling 'protects
competition in the grocery market, which will prevent prices from rising
even more.'"
If the deal had succeeded, Kroger's store count would have almost
doubled, "exceeding the scale of Walmart’s 3,500 supercenters,"
Michaels and Thomas add. "Rodney McMullen, Kroger’s longtime chief
executive, had pledged to eventually invest $1 billion annually in
lowering prices at the acquired Albertsons stores. . . . FTC attorneys
argued the deal would only give Kroger a reason to increase prices by
removing a competitor."
Earlier in the year, Albertsons CEO Vivek Sankaran told a federal court that "if Albertsons’s sale to Kroger was blocked, the supermarket chain would consider closing stores or laying off workers," the Journal reports. "He said that while the company’s business is sound for now, in the next two to three years it could need to find another buyer."
No comments:
Post a Comment