Medicare beneficiaries treated at critical access
hospitals "end up paying between two and six times more for outpatient
services than do patients at other hospitals," says a report released Wednesday by the inspector general at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Jordan Rau reports for Kaiser Health News.
"Medicare requires patients to pay 20 percent of the amount a critical
access hospital charges," Rau writes. "At other hospitals, patients also pay 20
percent coinsurance, but it is based on the amount Medicare decides to
reimburse the hospital, which is almost always significantly below what
the hospital charges." For example, in 2012 a Medicare patient receiving an electrocardiogram
at a critical access hospital owed an average of $33, while patients at
other hospitals paid $5, and critical access hospital patients
getting an initial infusion into a vein had to pay $56, compared to $25 at other hospitals.
"The inspector general’s office recommended Congress change the law so
that a Medicare beneficiary’s financial responsibility better reflects
the cost of the service," Rau writes. (Read more)
A digest of events, trends, issues, ideas and journalism from and about rural America, by the Institute for Rural Journalism, based at the University of Kentucky. Links may expire, require subscription or go behind pay walls. Please send news and knowledge you think would be useful to benjy.hamm@uky.edu.
Mittwoch, Oktober 08, 2014
Medicare patients at critical access hospitals paying much higher rates than at other hospitals
Labels:
critical access hospitals,
health,
health care,
health insurance,
Medicaid,
rural health,
rural-urban disparities
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen