Expensive broadband service, brought on by too few providers, is the reason why more than 25 percent of Americans—many of them low-income or in rural areas—are unable to afford the Internet, says a report by the Broadband Opportunity Council, a group formed by President Obama earlier this year, Allan Holmes reports for The Center for Public Integrity.
The report says "the high-speed Internet market in the U.S. is dominated by Comcast Corp., AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc., Time Warner Cable Corp. and a handful of others," Holmes writes. The report states: “Lowering barriers to deployment and fostering market competition can drive down price, increase speeds and improve service and adoption rates across all markets.”
Holmes writes, "In numerous investigations, the Center for Public Integrity found that U.S. broadband prices are higher than those in countries similar to the United States and that price, not a perception of relevance, influences the decision to buy an Internet subscription. And the reason for the high prices is the lack of competition. The federal government, however, doesn’t have a lot of levers to pull to increase competition." (Internet Providers by Zip Code map)
A digest of events, trends, issues, ideas and journalism from and about rural America, by the Institute for Rural Journalism, based at the University of Kentucky. Links may expire, require subscription or go behind pay walls. Please send news and knowledge you think would be useful to benjy.hamm@uky.edu.
Donnerstag, September 24, 2015
Lack of competition among Internet providers leading to high prices, government report says
Labels:
broadband,
information technology,
Internet,
rural-urban disparities,
technology,
telecommunications
Abonnieren
Kommentare zum Post (Atom)

Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen