The Endangered Species Act is credited with saving the American alligator, bald eagle, grizzly bear and nearly 300 other species from permanent extinction, but last month, the Trump administration put that law in danger. The administration has proposed changes in the act's enforcement, including deciding that razing habitat where endangered or threatened species live, breed and eat will no longer incur federal penalties, Grist staff reports.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service implements the Endangered Species Act and determines which species are "threatened" or "endangered." When a private or federal development project may harm a species, developers must consult with the service or receive a permit before construction. The interpretation of "take" and "harm" in the law means that any attempts to kill or capture an at-risk species are penalized, including attempts to degrade their habitats.In an internal memo, the Trump administration proposed changing this understanding of "take" to mean only intentional attempts at killing an animal, which would disregard the unintentional damage to habitats that threaten species survival. According to Grist reporters, this would remove protections from some of the first animals who received them under the Endangered Species Act, and would further harm animals who never received any protections at all. Harm may come in the form of human development and unregulated pollution on at-risk animals’ land.
According to the Grist report, the following species may struggle in light of the changes:
- North Atlantic right whale
- Eastern massasauga rattlesnake
- Bull trout
- Florida panther
- California sea otter
- Rusty patched bumble bee
- Eastern hellbender
- Red-cockaded woodpecker
- Palila
- Chinook salmon



























.jpg?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=index&utm_content=original)




