"Shortly after the company was notified of the safety allegations, Exxon Mobil issued a statement saying that was still reviewing the notice and had not determined what action it would take," AP reports. "The company has 30 days from the date of the notice, Nov. 6, to respond. It can also request an extension of time during that 30 days. Court litigation likely will take much longer. A lawsuit filed by U.S. Attorney Christopher Thyer and Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel is not scheduled for trial until Feb. 24, 2015. Exxon Mobil has asked the court to dismiss the case, a request that has yet to be ruled upon by U.S. District Judge James M. Moody. Mayflower business owners and residents in the area have filed the other lawsuits." (Read more)
Meanwhile, some Mayflower residents "were forced to sell because oil settled in their homes' foundations, where removing it is nearly impossible," Eifling and Hirji write. "Others chose to leave because of fears about potential health effects and the marketability of their properties. Those who are staying aren't necessarily doing so by choice: Many don't have enough equity to afford a down payment on a new home in another suburb, according to local real estate brokers." Homeowner Ryan Senia told Eifling and Hirji it was either sell to Exxon now or risk "holding onto that thing forever. It's like selling a salvaged car—nobody wants to buy it." (Read more)
No comments:
Post a Comment