U.S. soybean farmers panic over lack of sales to China

Some U.S. soybean farmers will store, instead of sell,
this year's crop. (Photo by Mark Serafino, Unsplash)

U.S. farmers haven’t sold beans to China, and soybean growers are sounding the alarm. "American soybean farmers are in panic mode as they harvest what is expected to be a bumper crop," reports Patrick Thomas of The Wall Street Journal. "China accounted for more than half of the $24.5 billion of American soybean exports last year."

By snubbing American soybeans and purchasing South American-grown beans instead, China is once again using U.S. farmer strife as a way to punish the Trump administration's trade wars. Thomas adds, "From January through August of this year, Chinese buyers purchased just over 200 million bushels of U.S. soybeans, compared with almost 1 billion bushels over the same period last year."

Even before China opted not to purchase U.S. soybeans, American farmers were already struggling with high costs for equipment, labor and fertilizer. "Congress in December passed a $10 billion bailout for farmers," Thomas wrote. "President Trump said on Monday that he was 'going to do some farm stuff this week' to help growers cope with the loss of exports to China."

Meanwhile, some soybean growers are choosing to store their harvested crops for now. Iowa soybean grower Morey Hill told Thomas, “There’s no incentive to sell right now." Hill predicted that without sales to China, the soybean market could likely turn into a "blood bath."

Instead of waiting on China, Hill has been traveling to countries such as Cambodia and Morocco, working to educate farmers on the benefits of using U.S. soybeans in their fish and animal feed, which is what China does with the majority of its soybeans.

The European Union, Mexico, Vietnam, Egypt and Bangladesh also purchase U.S. soybeans, but those sales, even when combined, aren't enough.

Rural hospitals in Arkansas find different ways to stay open and still serve their communities

Rural hospitals, represented by green dots, stretch across mid- to southern Arkansas counties. 

Rural hospitals in Arkansas continue to explore the best ways to serve their communities despite severe financial struggles. Some medical centers have found success by ending inpatient care in exchange for more Medicare dollars, while others keep their doors open by opting for other designations to continue providing vital care, such as inpatient stays, reports Tess Vrbin of The Arkansas Advocate. According to a 2023 University of Arkansas review, roughly 41% of Arkansas residents live in rural areas.

Two years ago, DeWitt Hospital and Nursing Home was in financial straits and CEO Brian Miller chose to convert it into a "rural emergency hospital, which draws more federal funds to rural hospitals if they reduce or eliminate inpatient services and focus on emergency and outpatient treatment," Vrbin writes.

Beyond higher Medicare payments, the switch helped DeWitt lower costs while adding income from outpatient services, such as cardiology and wound care. The hospital is one of five Arkansas hospitals to sign up for the emergency rural designation.

But converting to an emergency triage-type care model doesn't work for every rural community. The Southwest Arkansas Regional Medical Center in Hope will not apply for rural emergency status because inpatient stays are needed for residents in surrounding counties. Its chief administrative officer, Shelby Brown, told Vrbin, "We want to be able to, if we need to admit someone, to put them in our hospital so they can stay home locally."

Instead of opting to convert to a rural emergency hospital, Southwest Arkansas Regional applied for and received approval to become "a critical access hospital, a federal designation for facilities located no fewer than 35 miles from other hospitals and maintaining no more than 25 beds," Vrbin explains. "Medicare subsidizes critical access hospitals for inpatient treatment of Medicare recipients."

For many rural hospitals in Arkansas, the choice between ending certain types of patient care or possible closure is difficult. Brown told the Advocate, "The big scheme of rural health in the state of Arkansas is in a crisis mode. . . . I would always think it’s better to have a rural emergency hospital versus no hospital.”

Opinion: Rural policing writer disagrees with Wall Street Journal article about rural law enforcement violence

Rural police officers have high rates of shootings, but they 
are also more likely to get shot. (Adobe Stock photo)

A Wall Street Journal story about violence in rural policing gets some concepts right; however, the story's data and overall conclusions are faulty, writes rural police reporter Kathleen Dias in her column for Police1. "I agree with the premise of the article: there really are a lot of harsh interactions between law enforcement and the public in rural places. . . . Where the WSJ writer and I disagree is in the conclusion he draws (that rural cops kill people because they are poorly trained or trained to overreact), the sources for his statistics, and his slant."

"Rural places have high rates of shootings by law enforcement and also of law enforcement officers who get shot; that’s not new information or a new trend," Dias explains. "The writer is also correct that rural agencies frequently lack the ability to use the tools of time, distance and backup to defuse volatile situations."

The article's primary focus is that "rural sheriffs are killing more civilians," Dias adds. "The writer cites Mapping Police Violence stating that since 2013, killings by sheriff’s deputies have risen 43% while killings by police have risen by 3%. . . . First, sheriff’s offices are not all rural [and] not all rural police interactions, lethal or otherwise, are by sheriff’s offices."

Overall, MPV as a source is "profoundly troublesome. 'Police violence' is a broad, provocative term," Dias explains. "The definition from MPV is 'Any incident where a law enforcement officer (off-duty or on-duty) applies, on a civilian, lethal force resulting in the civilian being killed. . . . I found incidents like an off-duty Virginia state trooper who killed a man who was breaking into his home, an off-duty officer who killed his domestic partner and then himself, an off-duty deputy who struck a bicycle rider at night on a Florida highway notorious for wrecks. . ."

The WSJ article uses examples that aren't rural. Dias writes, "The article is about rural police killings, yet the first several quotes are from urban sheriffs about their resources, their experiences and cultural changes they made."

There was an "implicit undertone in the WSJ article’s descriptions of small towns and remote places of the incongruity of violence in those places — that somehow a rural setting made violence even less acceptable than usual," Dias writes. "I believe that underscores the writer’s lack of understanding of rural places, and also the perception of risk by officers."

What rural officers do face is populations that are "more likely to be poor, addicted to alcohol and illegal substances, and to attempt or complete suicide than their urban neighbors," Dias points out. "Rural officers are often poorly paid, and departments do struggle with recruiting, retention and churn that can result in bad hiring choices."

Rural officers need more staff, higher pay, additional training and equipment that works. "I’ll go to the wall with the WSJ writer on those points," Dias adds. "The officers themselves are not the problem. Indeed, they’re expected to be the solution to every problem that comes the way of every other resident, but that’s impossible. They’re cops, not Swiss Army knives."

Read all of Dias' opinion, including her comparison of the WSJ article to a Washington Post story here.

Reporting on Addiction launches hub for journalists covering opioid addictions, deaths and settlement dollars

As opioid settlement money continues to be divvied out to state and local governments, reporters can help their communities understand where the money is coming from and discern who and how their regional governments are spending it.

Reporting on Addiction, a collaborative project of the Opioid Policy Institute and 100 Days in Appalachia, provides reporters with an "Opioid Settlement Resource Hub" filled with robust story ideas and insights to use when covering the history, dollar amounts, tools and impact of opioid settlement funds in local communities.

For journalists looking to explain the history of opioids in the U.S. and the background of the settlements, the hub provides story angles and questions for reporters to consider, as well as examples from reliable news sources for context.

Once an audience knows more about how opioid addictions and overdose deaths negatively impacted their community and how settlement spending plans aim to spur recovery, journalists can create community-specific settlement tracking tools that serve as a valuable public resource. The hub provides links for numerous ways to investigate and report on settlement spending.

Is it working? Journalists can help their audiences measure if opioid settlement plans and spending are slowing the opioid crisis within their communities. Stories that evaluate the results and how plans evolve will become increasingly crucial as programs are implemented and more data becomes available.

Quick hits: Using a pay phone; hated Halloween candy; oral health is part of overall health; dude ranches for all

Finding and using a pay phone is a modern curiosity.
(Photo by Darin Epperly, Flatwater Free Press)

Smartphones may be the way of today, but pay phones still exist, and a call can cost a mere quarter. "Lane Handke called his wife to tell her he was bringing home the shelves they needed to finish their cabinet. The call cost him 25 cents," reports of Kevin Warneke of Flatwater Free Press. "Then, he phoned a friend just to say hello. . . . Handke made his calls from a pay telephone standing outside the Pierce Telephone Co. building. He felt drawn to this pay phone by curiosity. Pulled toward it by nostalgia." He told Warneke, “I hadn’t used a pay phone in decades. People were looking and wondering what I was doing. I thought it was kind of cool.”

While wind, solar, nuclear and fossil fuels are all part of the U.S. energy grid, geothermal power may be the next source to enter the mix. "The promise of new engineering techniques for geothermal energy – heat from the Earth itself – has attracted rising levels of investment to this reliable, low-emission power source that can provide continuous electricity almost anywhere on the planet," writes geophysicist Moones Alamooti for The Conversation. "That includes ways to harness geothermal energy from idle or abandoned oil and gas wells. . . . In the first quarter of 2025, North American geothermal installations attracted $1.7 billion in public funding – compared with $2 billion for all of 2024."

Do you know which Halloween candies are the most
disliked? (Adobe Stock photo)

As Halloween gets closer, adults and kids out shopping are met with store shelves packed with chewy eyeballs, glow-in-the-dark worms, bat-shaped candy bars, corn that's not real corn, and festive fall packaging. But some people find the  sweet, sticky world of Oct. 31 candy disgusting -- so much so, there's a list of the 10 most despised Halloween candies. Guesses go here.

Oral health and overall health are closely linked, and some "practitioners think dentistry should no longer be siloed," reports Lola Butcher for Knowable magazine. "Dentistry and medicine have operated as parallel fields: Dentists take care of the mouth, physicians the rest of the body. That is starting to change. . . . Dental hygienists have started working in medical clinics; physicians and dentists have started a professional association to promote working together; and a new kind of clinic — with dentists and doctors under one roof — is emerging. . . . The list of connections between oral health and systemic health — conditions that affect the entire body — is remarkable."

Triangle X Ranch, inside Grand Teton National Park, has been in the Turner family for nearly a century. 
(Triangle X Ranch photo via The New York Times)

Saddle up or relax at one of these six dude ranches. "All-inclusive guest ranches let you connect with nature, as well as your inner cowpoke, on the trail, around the campfire and under the starry skies," reports Ruffin Prevost for The New York Times. Whether honing horse skills, seeking majestic views, or simply wanting to leave technology and stress behind by heading out to the American West, Prevost's list offers suggestions and resources for a rural getaway.

Here a seed, there a seed, everywhere a company selling or consolidating to sell seeds. "Keeping track of [seed] brands — especially corn and soybeans — can be daunting," reports of Chris Torres of Farm Progress. "Knowing who owns what can provide crucial insights into what companies are behind the brands you buy, how they source and develop genetics, and what sorts of technology may be available to you." A compact seed chart and a listing of university variety seed trials are found here.

Each piano was tuned slightly differently to produce 11,000 Strings.
(Photo by Stephanie Berg via the Smithsonian)

When 100 pianos at the Hailun piano factory in China were all played together to test their performance before being shipped out, conductor Peter Paul Kainrath was there to experience the "massive sound," reports Ella Feldman for Smithsonian magazine. "The cacophonic scene left Kainrath so inspired that he called Austrian composer Georg Friedrich Haas to discuss its potential. . . .The next morning, Haas told Kainrath that if he brought him 50 pianos, he would compose a piece. The resulting composition is Haas’ 11,000 Strings."

Rural hospitals struggling to stay open can't use the newly created $50 billion federal fund to survive

President Trump signs his bill of tax breaks and spending cuts.
(Photo by Julia Demaree Nikhinson, AP via the Yonder)

Rural hospitals struggling to stay open will be unable to manage financial shortages caused by ongoing Medicaid cuts with funds from the Rural Health Transformation Program, which sets aside $50 billion in federal dollars for rural hospitals. Liz Carey for The Daily Yonder reports, "The legislation itself specifically says RHTP funds cannot be used as an offset for Medicaid. And the administration in multiple avenues has specifically said this cannot be used to keep rural hospitals open, period.”

During summer budget negotiations, lawmakers created the RHTP program and touted it as a way to protect rural hospitals; however, the totals don't balance each other out. "Federal Medicaid spending in rural areas is expected to drop by about $15.5 billion per year over the next 10 years," Carey explains. The Rural Health Transformation Program "will provide about $10 billion per year over five years. Many industry experts say that’s not enough."

Although lawmakers may have said the fund was to keep rural hospitals open, the program isn't designed to save struggling medical centers in the short term. Instead, states that apply to the program must include a "rural transformation plan" that outlines how they will improve services, cut costs and deploy technology with RHTP funding aimed at long-term solvency.

Any state that receives RHTP funding will also be "assessed for additional funding based on its population, the number of rural health facilities it has, and the situation of the hospitals in the state to receive additional funds," Carey explains. "Additional funds would also be allocated based on 'how well state applications align with program strategic goals,'" which includes the HHS Make America Healthy Again initiative.

At its core, RHTP funds won't help financially strapped hospitals stay open, and rural residents will likely face more struggles to access providers and care. Alan Morgan, president of the National Rural Health Association, told the Yonder, "The $50 billion cannot by legislation (and is not by the administration) going to be used to help rural hospitals keep their doors open. This $50 billion is about sustaining healthcare for the future. It has nothing to do with maintaining access today.”

Journalists at rural Alaska newspapers quit over abrupt corporate edits to Kirk story that upset a state politician

Photo by Mark Sabbatini, Juneau Independent

Four journalists resigned from newspapers in rural Alaska after the publications’ corporate owner made "significant edits to an article about Charlie Kirk’s death, appearing to yield to pressure from a Republican state lawmaker who had criticized the coverage," reports Neil Vigdor of The New York Times.

The journalists who worked for The Homer News, The Peninsula Clarion and The Juneau Empire, were all employed by Alabama-based Carpenter Media. The news staff issued a joint resignation letter, noting that they had not been consulted about the edits, and that without editorial independence, the company's integrity as a news source was compromised.

The story at issue "chronicled a Sept. 17 vigil in Homer, Alaska, for Kirk, the Turning Point USA founder and a right-wing ally of President Trump’s who was fatally shot while speaking at Utah Valley University," Vigdor writes. In its second paragraph, the story "described Kirk as a a 'Christian-Nationalist icon' and defender of 'often racist and controversial views.'"

One of the vigil's organizers, Sarah Vance, a Republican state representative, took issue with the description of Kirk and wrote to the paper's corporate owners and "suggested that advertisers were planning to boycott the publications," Vigdor adds. The story then disappeared from online, only to reappear with numerous edits a few hours later.

In a statement, Carpenter Media Group said it altered the story because it did not meet company standards. Gregory Knight, an aide to Vance, "provided a statement from Vance saying that she did not expect her complaint to contribute to the resignations," Vigdor reports.

If Congress doesn't extend enhanced health care tax credits, 4 million rural Americans could face steep premium hikes

Average health care premium comparison before and after ACA credits for 10 'farm states.'
(Robert Woods Johnson Foundation graph)

Without the Affordable Care Act's enhanced tax credits, roughly four million rural Americans could see significant increases to their health care insurance premiums. Last year, the Health and Human Services reported that 17% of individuals who purchased insurance through the ACA marketplace were rural residents, reports Chris Clayton of Progressive Farmer.

While Washington lawmakers focus on eliminating programs that could use American tax dollars to pay for health insurance for illegal immigrants, "there is less talk about how much rural America relies on those tax credits," Clayton explains. "The tax credits have been a major driver for reducing the number of uninsured Americans."

In 2024, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation reviewed "enrollment of Medicaid and marketplace policies in ten 'farm states,'" Clayton reports. "In that study, eight states -- all but Iowa and Kentucky -- showed more than 5% of residents were enrolled in ACA marketplace policies."

Without ACA enhanced tax credits, health insurance premiums may be out of reach for many rural Americans. According to the article, an individual making $35,000, with enhanced tax credits, would pay a health care premium of $1,033 per year. Without ACA credits, the premium jumps to $2,615 annually, representing a $1,582 increase.

"Overall, the enhanced tax credits saved rural enrollees an average of $890 per year, about 28% more than their urban counterparts," Clayton reports.

Despite delays and a new round of changes, many state broadband leaders feel they are 'on the right path'

Some states had to rework plans to expand internet
access with federal money. (Compare Fibre graphic)

States have been busy preparing and submitting proposals that outline how they plan to spend their portion of $42 billion in federal dollars earmarked for expanding internet access. The plans aim to build out high-speed internet infrastructure in remote and underserved areas.

The federal official in charge of the program, Arielle Roth, said "she is 'pleasantly surprised' at the progress states are making on their revised final plans for the Broadband Equity, Access and Deployment program," reports Chris Teale of Route Fifty.

After Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick announced last-minute changes to the BEAD program in June, states had to rush to "revamp their plans to make them comply," Teale explains. According to the article, 43 states and territories have submitted their final plans for review and compliance guidance.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration has "come under fire for adding an additional bidding round to what they have determined would be the most expensive locations to connect," Teale reports. "The agency rejected those claims in a recent fact sheet."

The overall shifts in the program mean that some states won't need all the money they've been allotted. Teale explains, "Meghan Sandfoss, Kentucky’s executive director of broadband development, said the state will only use around a third of its $1.1 billion allocation to serve its 87,000 eligible locations." It's not clear where the "leftover" funding will go.

States still have a long list of work to be completed; however, "several state broadband leaders said they are on the right path," Teale adds.

Minnesota’s Executive Director of Broadband Development, Bree Maki, told Route Fifty, "I think the harder part for us is the stuff that we can't control: the pole attachments, railroad crossings, those kinds of issues that aren't as cut and dry."

Sharpie marker manufacturing thrives in Tennessee after moving all production back to U.S.

The Maryville plant makes 1.8 million fine-tip Sharpies 
a day. (Sharpie graphic)

With planning, investments, and an eye on domestic manufacturing, Newell Brands now produces almost all its Sharpie markers in Maryville, Tennessee, using all American-made pieces, except for the felt tips, which are made in Japan, reports Natasha Khan of The Wall Street Journal.

During the early 2000s, Newell moved some parts of Sharpie manufacturing overseas; however, around 2018, company leadership introduced a strategy to move all Sharpie marker production back to the company's 37-year-old Maryville plant.

Overall, the successful move "took close to $2 billion in investments across the company, thousands of hours of training and a total overhaul of the production process," Khan explains. "Newell did it without reducing the employee count, and without raising prices."

Some of the company's transitional success is attributed to robotic advances, but Newell didn't replace people with robots. Instead, it kept its "employees who knew the company and converted their jobs to roles such as automation engineering," Khan adds. For instance, robots now pack boxes and employees "fix the robot instead of packing boxes."

In many cases, Newell paid for the additional education and training employees needed to be prepared for new roles. Khan writes, "The average wage at its Maryville facility, which employs 550 staff, has gone up some 50% over the past five years — without a change in head count."

The Maryville factory floor is "marked squares to delineate space for more lines to shift to America, such as Sharpie’s Clearview highlighter; it will move back from China in coming months," Khan adds. "The factory operates around the clock, making 1.8 million fine-tip Sharpies a day."