States warn millions of SNAP and WIC recipients that a continued shutdown will pause November benefits

Area food banks are preparing for a surge in need.
(Adobe Stock photo)

At least 25 states issued benefit gap warnings to the more than 41 million Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program recipients and nearly 7 million families who receive aid from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, known as WIC," report Leah Douglas and P.J. Huffstutter of Reuters.

Minerva Delgado, who directs Alliance to End Hunger activities, told Reuters, "Families are going to be hurt by this should it continue, at a time we know families are struggling to make ends meet."

Food banks in states that issued SNAP and WIC warnings are already hard at work to meet increased demand. But some food pantries already face food shortages due to USDA cuts to its food bank support earlier this year.

Potential loss of grocery benefits would disproportionately hurt rural residents, veterans and elderly individuals who tend to be more dependent on SNAP benefits. Additionally, rural food pantries will face significant supply challenges because they rely more heavily on Department of Agriculture programs and have fewer private donors to help them.

According to Reuters, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins told NewsNation that SNAP benefits would "go away" without a deal to reopen the government by November.

The liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities "estimates that about $5 billion is available in a contingency fund and is calling on the administration to use that for partial benefits in November," reports Geoff Mulvihill of The Associated Press. "Forty-six of the 47 Democrats in the U.S. Senate sent a letter Thursday to Rollins calling on her to release the contingency money."

States that issued verifiable benefit loss warnings include: Minnesota, California, Pennsylvania, Texas, California, Arkansas, Hawaii, Indiana, Mississippi, New Jersey, Kentucky, Florida, New York, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin.

Louisiana, Vermont and Virginia pledged to maintain food aid to recipients despite potential gaps in federal funding.

U.S ranchers and GOP lawmakers in farming regions denounce Trump administration plans to import beef

Many American ranchers see Argentina beef as a major
competitor. (Carol Highsmith's America photo)

American cattle ranchers and GOP members from farming states have a beef with President Donald Trump's plan to import meat from Argentina to help decrease U.S. beef prices.

Several GOP senators were "completely blindsided by the president’s announcement that he was looking into a deal with one of American ranchers’ biggest competitors," report Meredith Lee Hill and Rachel Shin of Politico. "Those GOP lawmakers are now facing intense blowback from angry ranchers and beef trade groups."

In her social media post, Nebraska Sen. Deb Fischer wrote, "The U.S. has safe, reliable beef, and it is the one bright spot in our struggling ag economy. Nebraska’s ranchers cannot afford to have the rug pulled out from under them when they’re just getting ahead or simply breaking even."

Other livid GOP members point out that the beef deal with Argentina wasn't a good way to solve grocery store beef prices and that Trump's plan did not "put America first."

While Trump touted Argentinian beef imports as an immediate way to lower beef costs for U.S. consumers, Department of Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins unveiled "plans to open up new lands for cattle ranching and support new beef processing plants as part of a broader effort to lower beef prices for consumers," reports Patrick Thomas of The Wall Street Journal. "The effort would also include incentives for production of new, smaller processing plants."

USDA will release $3 billion and reopen Farm Service Agency core services

Despite some bumper crops, American farmers have
had a tumultuous season. (Photo by Jed Owen, Unspash)

U.S. farmers are harvesting big crops, but many are reaping little or no profit. To address some of their economic strife, the Department of Agriculture is "planning to release more than $3 billion in aid to U.S. farmers that had been frozen as a result of the government shutdown," report Natalie Andrews and Patrick Thomas of The Wall Street Journal.

Bumper crops should be a boon for American farmers, but instead they are "fueling a glut that is driving down prices. Rising costs for fertilizer and farm equipment are also squeezing their balance sheets," Andrews and Thomas explain.

In addition to cash assistance, the USDA will "resume Farm Service Agency core operations, which have been closed for three weeks during the government shutdown," Andrews and Thomas write. "This will allow farmers to access aid, including some safety-net programs." 

President Donald Trump considered using tariff revenue to fund a bailout package for farmers earlier this year; however, the $3 billion comes from the Commodity Credit Corp., the same fund Trump tapped to help farmers weather his first-term tariffs. 

Before the government closed, the Trump administration was considering another $10 billion for farmers "struggling because of Trump’s trade war, but that new relief is on hold while the government is shut down," the Journal reports.

President Trump will be in Asia next week, where he "plans to push Chinese leader Xi Jinping to buy U.S. soybeans to help struggling American farmers," Andrews adds. "The two leaders are scheduled to meet on the sidelines of a summit in South Korea."

If natural gas is relatively cheap, why are so many Americans facing higher utility bills?

Graph by Alyson Hurt and Jeff Brady, NPR from U.S. Energy Information Administration data

Across the country, utility companies are replacing leaky pipes and upgrading natural gas infrastructure, which is expensive. "Because it's a monopoly utility, regulators will pass those costs on to ratepayers," reports Jeff Brady of NPR. "Gas utilities have increased construction spending dramatically in recent years — up 50% from 2022 to 2023, to $49.1 billion."

Since gas companies don't make money selling gas, they aim to profit from reconstruction costs. "Utilities make their money by building new infrastructure, such as pipelines, and replacing outdated infrastructure," Brady explains. "Regulators then allow companies to recover those costs, plus profits, in customer bills."

Even as the cost of natural gas has dipped, consumers haven't benefited. "In 1984, about two-thirds of gas utility bills paid for the gas, and one-third covered infrastructure, utility costs and taxes," Brady reports. "Now that has flipped. In 2024, less than a third of customer bills went to gas, and about two-thirds went to the other costs."

One solution to reduce utility costs is for state regulators to encourage utilities to repair rather than replace faulty pipes. Regulators in Massachusetts asked gas companies to do three things to hold down costs: Fix pipes, shut down segments of leaky pipes and install electric heat pumps. Brady adds, "State officials say gas utility customers could see up to a 17% decrease in a pipeline replacement surcharge on their monthly bills."

Columnist reflects on dumping junk in rural areas

Kallner suggests there's a better way to get rid of rubbish.
(Photo by Lance Grandahl, Unsplash)

Getting rid of trash can be a problem in rural areas.

People used to be able to dump their junk out “in the back.” Now they have to dispose their waste in accordance with local government ordinances, Donna Kallner wrote in a column for The Daily Yonder.

Kallner said rural folks need to “find a place at the intersection of personal rights and responsibility where we can agree on some norms of behavior – individual and collective” when it comes to dumping trash.

That means not leaving items at the side of the road – or on public and private land – in the middle of the night. It also means thinking about how your unwanted items and waste might affect the land that future generations might build their homes on. 

Kallner also encourages citizens to think about trash disposal when voting for government representatives. 

She mentioned that after a tornado hit her town in northern Wisconsin, miscommunication with residents led to improper debris disposal, which the local government later had to pay to clean up. Kallner added that it's important to vote for local officials who can plan and manage local funds and land responsibly. 

Journalists can help rural communities by reporting on local drinking water data and quality

The EPA maintains the Safe Drinking Water Information System. Users can click on states or use search tools.

Rural communities need journalists who investigate and report on local and more regional drinking water issues, from tainted wells to water that runs brown and few people would voluntarily drink.

The Safe Drinking Water Information System is online, searchable and a place to start exploring area-specific data. SDWIS data is managed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and required by the Safe Drinking Water Act, writes Joseph A. Davis for the Society of Professional Journalists. Access SDWIS here.

The act requires more "public disclosure than almost any other environmental law. The data is all there (mostly), although SDWIS is not that easy to use," Davis explains. "It really helps if you know the official name of the drinking water system you are interested in."

U.S. water systems come in all sizes, and some regional water services have surprising regulations. Davis writes, "A Girl Scout summer camp’s well system may not even operate year-round. But it’s still a 'community water system' that must meet the act’s requirements."

For communities with more than 10,000 residents, the Consumer Confidence Report contains vital data. "It tells people whether the water meets standards (or doesn’t), and what the contaminants of concern are," Davis writes. Reporters may want to remind readers that not all contaminants are regulated.

Other tips include looking into lead and bacterial levels. Davis adds, "Groundtruth everything you can. Talk to water users and system operators instead of relying merely on data. Go to utility board meetings. Taste the water. Visit the source."

Cattle ranchers concerned about Walmart’s impact on U.S. beef industry

Photo by Tyler Delgado, Unsplash

Walmart’s new beef processing plant in Kansas has raised concerns among cattle ranchers that Walmart “will soon look to drive down the price it pays for cattle,” John McCracken reported for Investigate Midwest.

The U.S. beef industry is already struggling. There is a dwindling domestic herd, and four companies control most of the nation’s supply of beef, which makes it hard for independent ranchers to remain in the market.

Additionally, America imports a large amount of beef from JBS, a Brazilian meat processing company, which just went public on the New York Stock Exchange. To Mike Callicrate, a rancher and an advocate for family farms, the entry of JBS into the American stock market is a sign that independent ranchers are going to go out of business.

Big companies, with no other competition, will be able to set the prices as they see fit, completely dominating the market.

An example of this was when Walmart opened a milk-processing plant in Indiana in 2018. As a result Walmart milk prices rose, according to former Walmart CEO of American stores Greg Foran.

“The writing is on the wall,” CEO Bill Bullard of R-CALF said in an interview with McCracken. “We will continue to see more ranchers exit the industry, and we will continue to see fewer cows in the U.S beef cow herd. Walmart is simply just another step in the road to fully integrated, industrialized food production.”

Despite a shortage of medical care in rural America, some residents insult and undermine their doctors

Dr. Banu Symington is an board-
certified oncologist. 

Dr. Banu Symington treats patients in Rock Springs, Wyo., a town of about 24,500 people, where she was treated with kindness and respect until Covid masking battles and conspiracy theories began to enter her conversations with patients.

Symington's experience is mirrored by many other doctors "who say political attacks on science and medicine are affecting their relationships with patients, particularly in rural communities, where physician recruitment already poses a chronic challenge," reports Yuki Noguchi of NPR.

Some of Symington's cancer patients have sworn at her for "suggesting they vaccinate or wear masks to protect their weakened immune systems while undergoing chemotherapy," Noguchi adds. Symington told Noguchi, "It's very difficult, helping someone who scorns your help, or diminishes the value of it."

Some residents have consumed enough conspiracy theories that they believe physicians are trying to poison them for profit or that medical providers are somehow profiting alongside pharmaceutical companies at the expense of patients. 

Dr. Jennifer Bacani McKenney 
practices in her hometown. 

Dr. Jennifer Bacani McKenney practices family medicine in the tiny town of Fredonia, Kansas, where she was born and raised. McKenney's parents had emigrated from the Philippines to Fredonia, where her father started working as a surgeon. For years, McKenney enjoyed community trust as a "home-grown" physician, but "the spread of Covid-19 also revealed how some of her patients perceive outsiders," Noguchi writes.

McKenney told Noguchi, "My patients were calling Covid the China flu and Kung flu — that kind of thing — and saying about 'Asians needing to go back,' and they would say it to my face."

McKenney has continued her work in Fredonia, but acknowledges that today's political climate has made treating patients more challenging. She still recommends treatments, such as vaccines, that some patients push against. She told Noguchi, "But if I don't have those conversations, I'm not doing my job."

American consumers are worried about their energy bills, the job market and the increased cost of groceries

Americans deploy different strategies to counter grocery
costs. (Adobe Stock photo)

Between spiking energy bills and a dreary jobs market, a new poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs documents the deep stress many Americans feel about their bills and future financial prospects, reports Olivier Knox of U.S. News and World Report. Along with those worries, American consumers continue to look for ways to counter the ever-increasing cost of groceries.

When asked about utility bills, 36% of poll respondents said their "electricity bills are a 'major' source of stress, and a bit more than one half – 54% – said the same about grocery costs, a little more than a year ahead of the November 2026 midterm," Knox writes.

Roughly 47% of polled adults said they were "'not very' or 'not at all confident' they could find a good job if they wanted to," Knox reports. This response marks a big increase from 37% the last time the question was asked in October 2023.

Polled responses were somewhat surprising given the U.S. economy's low unemployment numbers and healthy stock market gains. Knox adds, "But there are worrying signs, including a weakening labor market."

While many Americans express concern about the overall cost of living, most continue to battle ongoing grocery price increases, reports Christopher Kuo of The Wall Street Journal. According to the Labor Department data, since August 2024, the price of "coffee increased 20.9%, ground beef was up 12.8%, and bananas rose 6.6%. Dairy, fruits, vegetables and cereals have all become pricier."

In an effort to help stretch their food budgets, some consumers are "cutting back on purchases, stockpiling certain foods or exploring more-affordable stores," Kuo adds. Other shoppers have become choosier about what lands in their cart, while others scour sale-only items.

U.S. food costs are rising due to higher commodity prices for items like beef, along with market adjustments to tariffs. Kuo explains, "Some of these costs have been absorbed by food companies; others are being passed on to consumers."

Farm-to-prison programs can provide inmates with healthier food, support area farmers and cut some state food costs

Farm-to-prison food can sometimes help states save money.
(Graphic by Adam Dixon, Offrange)

A small but growing number of programs are working to create farm-to-prison pipelines that provide fresher food to inmates while supporting area farmers. "Using nutritious, local ingredients in a prison setting to cook food from scratch is far from the norm," reports Liz Susman Karpfor for Offrange. "A handful of correctional facilities throughout the country are reshaping the unhealthy, tasteless, even toxic diet that has historically been served to people in prison."

In states such as Vermont and Maine where department of corrections are using farm-to-prison and made-from-scratch programs, the objectives are better inmate rehabilitation outcomes, overall inmate health improvements and food cost savings. 

DOC offices that want to begin farm-to-prison initiatives should start by getting support to work through procurement processes. Karpfor explains, "Each state possesses different, often cumbersome, and poorly understood procurement policies."

While some DOC officials may believe farm-to-prison food will be expensive, many times it saves the state money. The Mountain View Correctional Facility in Maine uses flour milled in the Northeast and bakes many of its bread items from scratch. Karpfor reports, "Baking a sub roll in-house costs 5.8 cents, versus 33 cents for one purchased via a state contract."

Kyle Moore, who is the food service manager at the Marble Valley Regional Correctional Facility in Rutland, Vermont, "sometimes purchases seconds or an oversupply at lesser cost," Karpfor writes. "His staff is testing products from Salvation Farms, an enterprise using agricultural surplus to build a resilient food system in Vermont."

Michigan and Oregon have "developed high-quality kitchen and gardening apprenticeships in which participants receive certifications and can sometimes be paid," Karpfor adds. While the list of states using farm-to-prison models is small, over the past five years it has grown "exponentially."

Opinion: American farmers grow the nation's food but can end up with little to show for it

High input costs are driving some farmers to the 'breaking point.'
(Photo by Beth Haynes via Farm Progress)

U.S. farmers not only provide food for the entire nation but also generate jobs and incomes across multiple industries. Despite their outsized contributions, many American farmers aren't making any money, writes Holly Spangler in her opinion for Farm Progress. While many farmers consider the current system "broken," there are solutions.

Jason Webster, who farms his own land and manages the Precision Technology Institute Farm at Pontiac, Ill., told Spangler, "We’ve got this pie of revenue when we harvest this crop. And there’s all these people that want their little chunk of it. . . . In the end, you just hope there’s a little sliver left over for the farmer. Right now? There’s no sliver. The whole system’s broke.”

A new report from agriculture economists Gary Schnikey and Nick Paulson at the University of Illinois, documents a 20% increase in farm equipment costs from 2021 to 2023. Spangler adds, "Before that, prices increased just 14% over nine years, from 2011 to 2020."

Some farmers are "being driven to the breaking point," Spangler writes. "Many are angry at large equipment corporations and, in some cases, at dealerships, which just keep consolidating, reducing competition."

Farmers like Beth Dorsey, Edwardsville, Ill., say the "cost of inputs and the lack of enforcing antitrust laws — for decades — have crippled agriculture," Spangler writes. 

To help farmers, the "government [needs] to pursue violations of antitrust laws and enforce the Packers and Stockyards Act, which was established in 1921 in response to the concentrated meatpacker market and gave more regulatory powers to the federal government," Spangler explains. "According to data collected by Farm Aid, the top four companies in each industry hold significant portions."

Partisan politics -- no matter which way farmers have voted -- have harmed farmers who need a full Farm Bill debated and passed. Spangler writes, "We need to have a real conversation about what’s important in agriculture and U.S. food production."

A simple website helps donors save the most vulnerable NPR and PBS stations

The Adopt-A-Station tool helps donors find and help
the most vulnerable stations. (NPR photo)

A simple website with a focused theme has started helping NPR and PBS stations after Congress rescinded $1.1 billion in Corporation for Public Broadcasting funding, leaving both entities with unforeseen budget shortfalls, reports Bob Sillick for E&P magazine.

Alex Curley, a former public media expert, created the single-page Adopt-a-Station website that "indicates which public media stations are most vulnerable to closing," Sillick explains. Most predictions estimate that nearly 1,000 stations would be affected by the loss of CPB support, with those serving indigenous, black and rural areas facing the most severe setbacks.

Approximately 40,000 people visited the Adopt-a-Station site during its first 30 days. Curley's most recent "review of analytics showed approximately 20% of visitors were clicking on a link to a station identified as losing 50% or more of its revenue," Sillick reports. "Curley is now working to increase visitor numbers to the site."

"I estimate 15% of all public media stations are at risk of closing," Curley told Sillick. "They either relied on federal funding so much that it was tough to stay open, or some other financial indicator paired with the loss of federal funding meant they couldn't balance their finances."