 |
Anthony Flaccavento has a rural platform.
(Photo by Justin Fleenor via Roanoke Times) |
Some liberals have come to hate Appalachia because its recent votes don't match their values, raising a fascinating debate "over what a liberal agenda for rural America might look like,"
The Roanoke Times said in the first of a pair of editorials on the topic this week.
The paper ran excerpts of a discussion on the liberal site
Daily Kos, where several posters argued that Appalachia no longer deserved taxpayer assistance. One wrote, "Why bankrupt the government to benefit folks who will never, ever agree with your policies? I
have no ‘collective experiences’ with these people. I don’t believe in
coal, guns, religion or just about anything else these people believe
in. That’s the basic problem. We are two very different countries and
only one can survive. None
of that is an excuse for knowingly voting for a racist, bigoted, lying,
ignorant buffoon for president."
The editorial said, "If there were a conservative website somewhere that was discussing
whether conservatives should help, say, inner cities, and the responses
were similar to the ones above, we’d have a very ugly word for that, now
wouldn’t we? So why are some liberals — again, the key word there is ‘some’ — so vicious against rural areas? Why aren’t they being called
out for their prejudices?"
The Times acknowledged that the quoted excerpts "are coming from the far left wing, not mainstream,
establishment liberalism. Still, they are instructive; conservatives
would say quite revealing. These viewpoints also aren’t confined simply
to Internet trolls. They’ve shown up in various ways in such well-known
publications as
New York magazine and
The New Republic. In one
much-quoted article headlined “
No Sympathy For The Hillbilly,” writer
Frank Rich urged Democrats to simply ignore rural voters because they —
we — are essentially irredeemable bigots who are too stupid to
appreciate any government help."
A possible liberal agenda for rural voters comes from Anthony Flaccavento, a Southwest Virginia farmer, 2012 congressional candidate and consultant on rural economies, who has written national magazine articles in the topic. The
second editorial says his rural platform on the
site Rural Progressive Politics "challenges Democratic orthodoxy in some
surprising ways. National Democrats are big on regulating banks; the
Rural Progressive Platform urges 'regulatory relief for community banks' on the grounds that they’re the ones most likely to be serving rural
communities." It also calls for “environmental regulations that are ‘scale appropriate’, i.e.,
less burdensome on small to mid-sized farms, businesses and
manufacturers.”
"The
most provocative passage in the platform," the Times says, "hints that maybe
Democrats shouldn’t adopt one particular litmus test that usually fells
their candidates in rural areas: 'Mountains, forests, valleys and
streams are a practical part of our lives and economies. No doubt this
is at least part of why we look at a chainsaw or a rifle so differently
from most city folks.'"