In June voters in Fremont, Neb., passed a controversial ordinance that would ban businesses from hiring illegal immigrants and landlords from renting to them, but now the town has put the law on hold in anticipation of a long legal battle. City "Council President Scott Getzschman said the decision does not mean the council is disregarding the results of the June 21 public vote to ban the housing and hiring of illegal immigrants in the city," Cindy Gonzalez of the Omaha World-Herald reports. "Rather, he said, the council is anticipating a court order to temporarily block enforcement of the law anyway. He said suspending the ordinance could hold down legal fees."
"Truly, the temporary restraining order was imminent," Getzschman said after the vote. "We were advised that if we actually suspend the ordinance ahead of those legal proceedings, we’d have an opportunity to possibly reduce costs." He added, "Costs are costs, and it’s saving money we don’t have." Similar ordinances in Hazelton, Pa., and Farmers Branch, Tex., have yet to be enforced four years after their passage due to costly legal battles. The American Civil Liberties Union and the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund have filed federal lawsuits against the Fremont law, Gonzalez reports. (Read more)
On Wednesday, one day after the city council voted to suspend the law, a federal judge declined to rule on the civil rights groups' lawsuit because she wasn't sure whether the matter was an issue for state or federal court. District Judge Laurie Smith Camp asked both sides to submit written arguments in two weeks, Juan Perez Jr. of the World-Herald reports. "Attorneys on both sides agreed that the ordinance is appropriate for federal review, but Smith Camp chose to err on the side of caution," Perez writes.(Read more)
Thursday, July 29, 2010
Wednesday, July 28, 2010
Illinois law, perhaps first, requires papers to post paid legal ads online, preserving ad revenue
Illinois has enacted what appears to be the nation's first law requiring newspapers that accept legal notices to upload the notices to a statewide website collectively owned by the newspapers. The law adopts the strategy that newspapers across the country have been using for years to keep state legislatures and local governments from dropping paid legal advertising in papers in favor of unpaid notices online.
The bill passed unanimously and was sponsored by the Illinois Press Association, which sponsors PublicNoticeIllinois.com, to which about 80 percent of the state's newspapers already upload legal ads. Taxpayers are able to search it for public notices by keyword, by newspaper and by county, IPA reports. In Iowa, all of the public notices published in newspapers are posted at iowanotices.org, according to the Iowa Newspaper Association Bulletin, which reported on the Illinois bill today.
UPDATE, July 29: "While the news in Illinois is very positive for newspapers, the news in other states varies dramatically," Arkansas Press Association Executive Director Tom Larimer writes in the latest Arkansas Publisher Weekly. "Take New Jersey, where at least three different pieces of legislation would allow government agencies and individuals to post public notices on the Internet rather than in newspapers. There are other examples. New Jersey just happens to be the latest bad one." (Read more)
The bill passed unanimously and was sponsored by the Illinois Press Association, which sponsors PublicNoticeIllinois.com, to which about 80 percent of the state's newspapers already upload legal ads. Taxpayers are able to search it for public notices by keyword, by newspaper and by county, IPA reports. In Iowa, all of the public notices published in newspapers are posted at iowanotices.org, according to the Iowa Newspaper Association Bulletin, which reported on the Illinois bill today.
UPDATE, July 29: "While the news in Illinois is very positive for newspapers, the news in other states varies dramatically," Arkansas Press Association Executive Director Tom Larimer writes in the latest Arkansas Publisher Weekly. "Take New Jersey, where at least three different pieces of legislation would allow government agencies and individuals to post public notices on the Internet rather than in newspapers. There are other examples. New Jersey just happens to be the latest bad one." (Read more)
Under relaxed law, coal firms plan campaign to defeat 'anti-coal' Democrats in Ky. and W.Va.
Coal companies are planning to take advantage of looser campaign-finance laws in an effort to defeat Democrats and elect Republicans to the House and Senate, John Cheves reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader. Cheves' story mentions three targets in Kentucky and West Virginia; the industry in the Appalachian coalfield probably faces the greatest challenges from environmental and safety rules being pushed by Democrats, but the internal industry letter on which his story is based could have been targeted to companies in the region and might be part of a broader industry effort.
The Democratic incumbents targeted in the letter are Reps. Nick Joe Rahall of southern West Virginia and Ben Chandler of Kentucky, whose Bluegrass district has no coal but has voters and campaign contributors who earn money from the industry. Rahall is opposed by Elliott "Spike" Maynard and Chandler is opposed by Garland "Andy" Barr. The Senate race mentioned in the letter, from an International Coal Group executive, is the high-profile Kentucky contest between Republican Rand Paul and Democrat Jack Conway, the state's attorney general. Besides ICG, the letter identifies Massey Energy, Alliance Resource Partners and Natural Resource Partners as participants in the effort.
Industries of all kinds are more able to play freely in politics, under a U.S. Supreme Court decision this year that threw out as unconstitutional much of the 103-year-old statutory system that limited the contributions of corporations and unions. It expanded the potential of "527 groups" that operate under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, which applies to a type of political organization. “A number of coal industry representatives recently have been considering developing a 527 entity with the purpose of attempting to defeat anti-coal incumbents in select races, as well as elect pro-coal candidates running for certain open seats,” Roger Nicholson, ICG's senior vice president and general counsel, wrote in the letter.
Cheves notes, "The coal industry already has supported Barr and Maynard through individuals’ relatively small and legally limited donations. But working together as a 527, the companies potentially could spend millions of dollars on political activity, as long as it isn’t coordinated with the Republicans’ campaigns. Lexington attorney and mine safety advocate Tony Oppegard told Cheves, “I think this is certainly troubling, and it’s going to put an entirely different face on American politics now that companies can do this. People are going to have to expect the rhetoric to get heated.” By “rhetoric,” Oppegard presumably means attack ads on radio or television, in direct mail or phone calls, or online. (Read more)
Under Section 527, groups do not have to report their income and expenses until after the election. A Democratic bill to force disclosure of that information failed yesterday to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster in the Senate, "virtually ensuring an onslaught of attack ads during this year's midterm election season," Dan Eggen of The Washington Post reports.
The Democratic incumbents targeted in the letter are Reps. Nick Joe Rahall of southern West Virginia and Ben Chandler of Kentucky, whose Bluegrass district has no coal but has voters and campaign contributors who earn money from the industry. Rahall is opposed by Elliott "Spike" Maynard and Chandler is opposed by Garland "Andy" Barr. The Senate race mentioned in the letter, from an International Coal Group executive, is the high-profile Kentucky contest between Republican Rand Paul and Democrat Jack Conway, the state's attorney general. Besides ICG, the letter identifies Massey Energy, Alliance Resource Partners and Natural Resource Partners as participants in the effort.
Industries of all kinds are more able to play freely in politics, under a U.S. Supreme Court decision this year that threw out as unconstitutional much of the 103-year-old statutory system that limited the contributions of corporations and unions. It expanded the potential of "527 groups" that operate under Section 527 of the Internal Revenue Code, which applies to a type of political organization. “A number of coal industry representatives recently have been considering developing a 527 entity with the purpose of attempting to defeat anti-coal incumbents in select races, as well as elect pro-coal candidates running for certain open seats,” Roger Nicholson, ICG's senior vice president and general counsel, wrote in the letter.
Cheves notes, "The coal industry already has supported Barr and Maynard through individuals’ relatively small and legally limited donations. But working together as a 527, the companies potentially could spend millions of dollars on political activity, as long as it isn’t coordinated with the Republicans’ campaigns. Lexington attorney and mine safety advocate Tony Oppegard told Cheves, “I think this is certainly troubling, and it’s going to put an entirely different face on American politics now that companies can do this. People are going to have to expect the rhetoric to get heated.” By “rhetoric,” Oppegard presumably means attack ads on radio or television, in direct mail or phone calls, or online. (Read more)
Under Section 527, groups do not have to report their income and expenses until after the election. A Democratic bill to force disclosure of that information failed yesterday to get the 60 votes needed to overcome a Republican filibuster in the Senate, "virtually ensuring an onslaught of attack ads during this year's midterm election season," Dan Eggen of The Washington Post reports.
Strip-mine agency's latest rulemaking has a much quieter 'hearing' process; industry objects
"We didn't want this to become a riot," John Craynon, chief of the regulatory division of the federal Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, told AP. "Some of the previous meetings have turned into quite rowdy events, where folks on all sides of the issue felt threatened or intimidated. We wanted to set up an environment where we could actually hear from the people." AP adds, "Craynon said this series of meetings, which began last week and includes stops in West Virginia and elsewhere this week, were the first he knew of in which the agency opted for a walk-in open house rather than a full-blown public meeting."
Despite the different format, the turnout at Hazard was the largest of the five hearings so far, Craynon told Brashear. But coal-industry supporters, who dominated last fall's meetings, took issue with the change. "By not having a public hearing, I think we lose a lot in the process of what democracy and free speech is all about," Bill Bissett, president of the Kentucky Coal Association, told AP. "Sending an e-mail is not going to have a proper effect or representative effect." But even under the new format, environmentalists were outnumbered at the Hazard event, AP reports. (Read more)
Oxycontin use grows among generation that 'just said no' but sees less stigma in prescription drugs
OxyContin abuse has been prevalent in rural Appalachia for many years, but now that trend is catching on elsewhere in the country, especially among youth, even after years of hearing messages to "just say no" to drugs. "Across the country, it has become a party drug favored by young, often middle-class people, and the trend is exploding in Northern California," which has many rural areas known for growing marijunaa, Cynthia Hubert of the Sacramento Bee reports.
"This is a generation of kids that said 'no' to marijuana and heroin," Jin Tanaka, a special agent in Sacramento with the Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement in the California Department of Justice, told Hubert. "We didn't teach them about prescription medications like OxyContin. They think it's OK because a doctor can prescribe it. Then they become addicts."
Udi Barkai, president and chief executive officer for Aegis Treatment Centers, which operates 24 clinics in California, told Hubert patients under 28 are the fastest growing population he sees related to prescription drug abuse. Just six percent of the 5,000 patients treated at Aegis clinics in 2006 were under 28, but through the first six months of 2010 the clinics have already treated 54 addicts in that age group, almost half of all patients seen. "People who used to shoot heroin 20 years ago are dying off," Barkai told Hubert, and being replaced by oxy addicts. "It has a softer look," he said. "It doesn't have the stigma because they don't have to shoot it into their veins."
Oxycontin "users can develop a physical dependence within weeks, but it often takes a year of treatment to kick the addiction," Hubert writes. "OxyContin abuse usually is treated with a daily swallow of methadone, a synthetic narcotic that helps curb cravings and withdrawal symptoms." In 2008 about half a million people used OxyContin for nonmedical purposes for the first time, Hubert writes, and as many as one in ten high school seniors have abused narcotic painkillers. "A lot of these are middle-class kids who find it at parties and clubs," Tanaka told Hubert. "They might be the nicest kids in the world, but once they get hooked, they'll do just about anything to keep getting that drug." (Read more)
"This is a generation of kids that said 'no' to marijuana and heroin," Jin Tanaka, a special agent in Sacramento with the Bureau of Narcotic Enforcement in the California Department of Justice, told Hubert. "We didn't teach them about prescription medications like OxyContin. They think it's OK because a doctor can prescribe it. Then they become addicts."
Udi Barkai, president and chief executive officer for Aegis Treatment Centers, which operates 24 clinics in California, told Hubert patients under 28 are the fastest growing population he sees related to prescription drug abuse. Just six percent of the 5,000 patients treated at Aegis clinics in 2006 were under 28, but through the first six months of 2010 the clinics have already treated 54 addicts in that age group, almost half of all patients seen. "People who used to shoot heroin 20 years ago are dying off," Barkai told Hubert, and being replaced by oxy addicts. "It has a softer look," he said. "It doesn't have the stigma because they don't have to shoot it into their veins."
Oxycontin "users can develop a physical dependence within weeks, but it often takes a year of treatment to kick the addiction," Hubert writes. "OxyContin abuse usually is treated with a daily swallow of methadone, a synthetic narcotic that helps curb cravings and withdrawal symptoms." In 2008 about half a million people used OxyContin for nonmedical purposes for the first time, Hubert writes, and as many as one in ten high school seniors have abused narcotic painkillers. "A lot of these are middle-class kids who find it at parties and clubs," Tanaka told Hubert. "They might be the nicest kids in the world, but once they get hooked, they'll do just about anything to keep getting that drug." (Read more)
Energy bill would require disclosure of fracking chemicals, disappoints renewable-energy lobbies
Senate Democrats' energy bill would require oil and gas drillers to disclose to state regulators the chemical ingredients" used in the fluids that they inject into deep, tight rock formations to release natural gas, Katie Howell and Alex Kaplun of Environment & Energy News report. Any proprietary formulas would not have to be disclosed, except medical emergencies. States or companies would have to post the hydraulic fracturing ("fracking") information online.
"The language in the Democrats' bill is similar to language that has reportedly been under discussion as a compromise between Democrats and industry groups," E&E reports. "But industry is not pleased with the Democrats' late addition." Lee Fuller, executive director of the industry group Energy In Depth and vice president of government relations for the Independent Petroleum Association of America, said in a statement, "The problem with this provision is that it has the potential to create a series of legal responsibilities that operators, and even service companies, might not be able to fulfill, especially under a scenario where folks are asked to post information that doesn't even belong to them." (Read more, subscription required)
Meanwhile, renewable-energy lobbies are disappointed at being left out of the modest bill that Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid introduced this week after failing to find 60 votes to break a promised Republican filibuster on a broader climate-and-energy measure.
"Wind and solar power advocates expressed disappointment with the lack of a Renewable Energy Standard," reports Sara Wyant in her weekly Agri-Pulse newsletter, published this morning. "Also missing is language to increase consumer demand for biofuels. Jeff Broin, CEO of Poet, the world’s largest ethanol producer, said Senate leadership missed an opportunity to significantly lessen America’s dependence on foreign oil."
Republicans still fear the Democrats might try to pass a bill to stanch climate change, with a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases, in a lame-duck session after the Nov. 2 elections. GOP Sen. Mike Johanns of Nebraska "introduced legislation this week that would require 67 senators to vote to allow-cap-trade to become law without having debated it in the Senate," Wyant reports. (Agri-Pulse is a subscription newslatter but offers a four-week trial.)
"The language in the Democrats' bill is similar to language that has reportedly been under discussion as a compromise between Democrats and industry groups," E&E reports. "But industry is not pleased with the Democrats' late addition." Lee Fuller, executive director of the industry group Energy In Depth and vice president of government relations for the Independent Petroleum Association of America, said in a statement, "The problem with this provision is that it has the potential to create a series of legal responsibilities that operators, and even service companies, might not be able to fulfill, especially under a scenario where folks are asked to post information that doesn't even belong to them." (Read more, subscription required)
Meanwhile, renewable-energy lobbies are disappointed at being left out of the modest bill that Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid introduced this week after failing to find 60 votes to break a promised Republican filibuster on a broader climate-and-energy measure.
"Wind and solar power advocates expressed disappointment with the lack of a Renewable Energy Standard," reports Sara Wyant in her weekly Agri-Pulse newsletter, published this morning. "Also missing is language to increase consumer demand for biofuels. Jeff Broin, CEO of Poet, the world’s largest ethanol producer, said Senate leadership missed an opportunity to significantly lessen America’s dependence on foreign oil."
Republicans still fear the Democrats might try to pass a bill to stanch climate change, with a cap-and-trade system for greenhouse gases, in a lame-duck session after the Nov. 2 elections. GOP Sen. Mike Johanns of Nebraska "introduced legislation this week that would require 67 senators to vote to allow-cap-trade to become law without having debated it in the Senate," Wyant reports. (Agri-Pulse is a subscription newslatter but offers a four-week trial.)
As meat industry plays for time and the election, allies in Congress blast proposed market rules
As the meat industry tries to delay new U.S. Department of Agriculture rules designed to curb anti-competitive practices that hurt producers, hoping a more Republican Congress will be elected Nov. 2, its allies in Congress are raising a bipartisan cacophony of objections. "The fight over these regulations is an earthquake in agriculture and in much of rural America. The fight is over who will have the power to shape the relationship between farmers and ranchers and meat producers — and this will shape the economic and social future of many communities in rural America," Bill Bishop writes for the Daily Yonder.
"The scene at the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry hearing Tuesday was brutal, as one member of Congress after another labeled the regulations as 'silly,' a 'serious mistake,' 'offensive' and a 'clear violation' of what legislators intended" when they directed USDA to write such rules, Bishop reports. "After this week’s lambasting, it seems likely that USDA will grant additional time for comments" on the rules, as the meatpacking lobbies have requested. Bishop's story has good background and links on the issue; read it here.
The National Pork Producers Council and National Cattlemen's Beef Association have filed formal requests for the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration to triple the usual 60-day comment period. The requests from "Big Pork and Big Beef" for delays show how little the groups carry about producers, agricultural journalist Alan Guebert opines in his syndicated Food and Farm File column.
"If new rules are not forthcoming to limit the massive market-moving capabilities of massive meatpackers, open and transparent markets will vanish, as they have in poultry markets, and production, like in poultry, will be by invitation -- contract -- only," Guebert predicts. "That's what NPPC and NCBA advocate when each parrots the packers' call to delay the GIPSA rule comment period in hopes of killing it." Guebert argues that the extended comment period, called for by the industry groups, only serves to give them more time to undermine GIPSA's new administrator and elect "a more packer-friendly Congress" on Nov. 2.
NPPC claimed the new rules "could limit pork producers' options in selling pigs to processors," and NCBA said it believed "this rule ... could have a huge impact on the marketing of cattle in the United States." Guebert agrees, and argues it would be for the good. He quotes DTN livestock analyst John Harrington's commentary about meatpacking giant JBS's recent purchase of the 130,000-head McElhaney Feedyard in Arizona, giving the company ownership of 47 percent of all cattle it slaughters: "While there is significant disagreement over exactly how much such captive sourcing hurts negotiated cash (prices), most would agree that the category of packer-owned cattle tends to be the most toxic in poisoning cash market demand." (Read more, via Farm World)
"The scene at the House Agriculture Subcommittee on Livestock, Dairy and Poultry hearing Tuesday was brutal, as one member of Congress after another labeled the regulations as 'silly,' a 'serious mistake,' 'offensive' and a 'clear violation' of what legislators intended" when they directed USDA to write such rules, Bishop reports. "After this week’s lambasting, it seems likely that USDA will grant additional time for comments" on the rules, as the meatpacking lobbies have requested. Bishop's story has good background and links on the issue; read it here.
The National Pork Producers Council and National Cattlemen's Beef Association have filed formal requests for the Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration to triple the usual 60-day comment period. The requests from "Big Pork and Big Beef" for delays show how little the groups carry about producers, agricultural journalist Alan Guebert opines in his syndicated Food and Farm File column.
"If new rules are not forthcoming to limit the massive market-moving capabilities of massive meatpackers, open and transparent markets will vanish, as they have in poultry markets, and production, like in poultry, will be by invitation -- contract -- only," Guebert predicts. "That's what NPPC and NCBA advocate when each parrots the packers' call to delay the GIPSA rule comment period in hopes of killing it." Guebert argues that the extended comment period, called for by the industry groups, only serves to give them more time to undermine GIPSA's new administrator and elect "a more packer-friendly Congress" on Nov. 2.
NPPC claimed the new rules "could limit pork producers' options in selling pigs to processors," and NCBA said it believed "this rule ... could have a huge impact on the marketing of cattle in the United States." Guebert agrees, and argues it would be for the good. He quotes DTN livestock analyst John Harrington's commentary about meatpacking giant JBS's recent purchase of the 130,000-head McElhaney Feedyard in Arizona, giving the company ownership of 47 percent of all cattle it slaughters: "While there is significant disagreement over exactly how much such captive sourcing hurts negotiated cash (prices), most would agree that the category of packer-owned cattle tends to be the most toxic in poisoning cash market demand." (Read more, via Farm World)
Project develops taste, skills for entrepreneurship among rural youth so they might stay or return
"Amid predictions of continuing migration from Appalachia by its young people, a new educational program is teaching elementary and middle school students in Appalachian Kentucky the entrepreneurial skills that can prepare them for a future in the region, creating jobs for themselves and others," reports Jon Hale of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues.
The E-Discovery Challenge includes instruction in economics, mathematics and other essential business skills, but they say their biggest lesson was the value of working together and trading ideas with others as they used small seed grants to develop a product and offer it for sale. “I learned you have to trust your teammates and work with them to do the job,” Morgan County student Josh Adkins, whose team made T-shirts, told Hale, a native of the region.
Another middle-school student, Devon Middleton of Elliott County (at right in photo, with his mother and teacher), told Hale that the program made him and his teammates consider becoming entrepreneurs as adults. Students and teachers in the program said the most valuable lesson may have been that there is opportunity in Appalachia. “It helped them see that they are not necessarily stuck,” Lawrence County teacher Joe Halfhill told Hale. “If they have a new idea or a twist on an old idea they don’t have to do what they have always done, what their parents did.”
The project is run by the Kentucky Entrepreneurial Coaches Institute at the University of Kentucky, which trained 55 teachers in 15 of the 40 Kentucky counties labeled economically distressed by the Appalachian Regional Commission. Institute Director Ron Hustedde said it reached nearly 1,700 students and created close to 500 small businesses. He noted that 18 percent of rural Americans already have their own business, and that number is projected to rise. (Read more)
The E-Discovery Challenge includes instruction in economics, mathematics and other essential business skills, but they say their biggest lesson was the value of working together and trading ideas with others as they used small seed grants to develop a product and offer it for sale. “I learned you have to trust your teammates and work with them to do the job,” Morgan County student Josh Adkins, whose team made T-shirts, told Hale, a native of the region.
The project is run by the Kentucky Entrepreneurial Coaches Institute at the University of Kentucky, which trained 55 teachers in 15 of the 40 Kentucky counties labeled economically distressed by the Appalachian Regional Commission. Institute Director Ron Hustedde said it reached nearly 1,700 students and created close to 500 small businesses. He noted that 18 percent of rural Americans already have their own business, and that number is projected to rise. (Read more)
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Columnist: Rural America must merge technology with culture to ensure a better future
Merging the blessings of technology with small-town culture is key to the revitalization of rural America, one commentator writes. "To put it bluntly: culture eats technology on any day of the week," Sylvia Lovely, former executive director of the Kentucky League of Cities, writes for NewGeography. Lovely outlines a variety of examples where culture has trumped investment in technology, but outlines five elements to finding the proper blend between combining "the technology that will lift up economic prosperity and build wealth and while understanding better the role of local culture in creating the resilient rural communities of the future."
Lovely terms her recommendations the five Ps: perspective, people, place, preservation and prosperity. Rural America needs "perspective and hard-nosed research to know where you stand: who is coming to or staying in your community or region," Lovely writes. It also needs "investment in people and their education, health and other documented needs, recognition and promotion of place, preservation of what is dear in our culture, and finally putting all that together with technology that can bring economic prosperity not only in dollars but in quality of life."
"We certainly need to take what technology offers, with its gift of allowing us to live and work anywhere. But this is a hollow benefit unless we imbue it with the culture that makes our lives special," Lovely concludes. "It won't be computers that will make our rural places unique. It will be the native music, crafts and stories and how we preserve and adapt them to modern times." (Read more)
Lovely terms her recommendations the five Ps: perspective, people, place, preservation and prosperity. Rural America needs "perspective and hard-nosed research to know where you stand: who is coming to or staying in your community or region," Lovely writes. It also needs "investment in people and their education, health and other documented needs, recognition and promotion of place, preservation of what is dear in our culture, and finally putting all that together with technology that can bring economic prosperity not only in dollars but in quality of life."
"We certainly need to take what technology offers, with its gift of allowing us to live and work anywhere. But this is a hollow benefit unless we imbue it with the culture that makes our lives special," Lovely concludes. "It won't be computers that will make our rural places unique. It will be the native music, crafts and stories and how we preserve and adapt them to modern times." (Read more)
Farm-state senators ask EPA to not toughen regulations on farm dust
Worried that the Environmental Protection Agency will crackdown on dusty farms, 21 senators from farm-heavy states have asked EPA not to tighten federal standards for coarse particulate matter. In a letter the senators said that if EPA follows through on a scientific advisory panel's recommendation to impose tougher standards farmers would face "the most stringent and unparalleled regulation of dust in our nation's history," Gabriel Nelson of Environment & Energy Daily reports. "The dust kicked up by agricultural operations is subject to the same air-quality rules as particulates from automotive tailpipes and coal-burning power plants," Nelson writes.
"We all want a clean and healthy environment, but it defies common sense to mandate that farmers keep dust between their fence rows when combining, or that the county government keep gravel dust on the road," Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is a farmer and spearheaded the letter, said in a statement."In a draft policy assessment published earlier this month, EPA scientists said the agency would be justified in 'retaining or revising' standards for the type of coarse dust commonly produced by farming operations," Nelson writes. EPA is expected to complete its review of particulate matter standards by late next year. (Read more, subscription required)
"We all want a clean and healthy environment, but it defies common sense to mandate that farmers keep dust between their fence rows when combining, or that the county government keep gravel dust on the road," Iowa Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley, who is a farmer and spearheaded the letter, said in a statement."In a draft policy assessment published earlier this month, EPA scientists said the agency would be justified in 'retaining or revising' standards for the type of coarse dust commonly produced by farming operations," Nelson writes. EPA is expected to complete its review of particulate matter standards by late next year. (Read more, subscription required)
Alfalfa could be feedstock for cellulosic ethanol
"Critics question whether alfalfa could ever be an economical fuel crop for many farmers," Brasher writes. However, alfalfa can, like soybeans, replenish nitrogen that corn takes from the soil, which would allow farmers to use less fertilizer, reducing runoff into streams. "Alfalfa also could provide soil protection, limiting erosion, because the crop would be left in the ground for a couple of years before the field is replanted to corn." The type of alfalfa used for ethanol production would be a super-sized variety of the crop now planted on 21 million acres nationwide. "The leaves would be sold for cattle feed," Brasher writes. "The stems would be processed into a feedstock for next-generation ethanol plants."
Minnesota Valley Alfalfa Producers, a farmers' cooperative, plans to start construction next month on a facility that would grind alfalfa into pellets that could be processed by an ethanol plant. The group does not yet have an ethanol producer to make the biofuel, Brasher reports. Big producers like Poet are working to reduce the cost of cellulosic ethanol, but "are struggling to reduce the cost to a level that's economically feasible and to attract investors," Brasher writes. Some, like Minnesota farmer Keith Poier, say even if the fuel cost slightly more than gasoline it would be better "than all those dollars leaving the community, going out of the country" for fossil fuels. (Read more)
Eastern Kentuckian returns home to show what locals can do to help revitalize Appalachia
Much has been made of the "brain drain" taking rural America's best students to cities, but one Eastern Kentucky man is hoping to reverse that trend by returning home with a proposal to help reclaim strip-mined land. When Nathan Hall of Allen, Ky., population 150, turned 18, he moved to Wisconsin but after several years away he "felt a growing need to re-connect with his home region," Elizabeth Lynch writes for the Daily Yonder. This summer he's using money from his Watson Fellowship to travel around the world to communities that, like his home Floyd County, "have relied on a single industry as well as communities that are working on land-recovery efforts," Lynch writes.
Hall was awakened to strip-mine issues while working with the Mountain Justice Summer camp, an anti-mountaintop-removal group comprised mostly of non-Appalachians. His experience "crystallized my intentions and my approach to the work I would do," he told Lynch. "Through my time in Louisville and with Mountain Justice Summer I had a 180˚ on my perspective on this region. This part of the country and the world needs positive work more than just about anywhere." Hall planned to work in a coal mine for several years to gain better insight into the industry, but left after a few months, following safety concerns from his family, in favor of attending Berea College.
Hall created his own major at Berea in sustainable industrial and agriculture management. After graduating in 2009 he developed "a biodiesel oil converter, a machine that turns cooking oil into fuel that can be used for tractors or other equipment that runs on diesel," Lynch writes. Hall's design, right, is mobile so he can bring it to small towns and schools across the state to illustrate the value of entrepreneurship. He has also developed an extensive agro-forestry plan for reclaimed strip mines that would "remove the exotic and invasive species that were planted as a cheap, short-cut cover up and break up compacted mine refuse," Lynch writes. (Photo by Lynch)
Hall points to motivation for change as the key to stopping the rural brain drain. "It’s tricky nowadays because I don’t see a lot of people around here who have that idea of needing to do something to help," he told Lynch. "To me that is the biggest barrier. You really have to try to encourage and motivate kids in depressed rural areas to come back and do something positive." (Read more)
Hall was awakened to strip-mine issues while working with the Mountain Justice Summer camp, an anti-mountaintop-removal group comprised mostly of non-Appalachians. His experience "crystallized my intentions and my approach to the work I would do," he told Lynch. "Through my time in Louisville and with Mountain Justice Summer I had a 180˚ on my perspective on this region. This part of the country and the world needs positive work more than just about anywhere." Hall planned to work in a coal mine for several years to gain better insight into the industry, but left after a few months, following safety concerns from his family, in favor of attending Berea College.
Hall points to motivation for change as the key to stopping the rural brain drain. "It’s tricky nowadays because I don’t see a lot of people around here who have that idea of needing to do something to help," he told Lynch. "To me that is the biggest barrier. You really have to try to encourage and motivate kids in depressed rural areas to come back and do something positive." (Read more)
Former Georgia governor looks to reverse 2002 mistake by focusing campaign on rural areas
Barnes campaign manager Chris Carpenter acknowledged the similarities between Barnes' current campaign and that of Perdue, who is term-limited this time. "Roy Barnes told me about six months ago that if he wins this election he’ll have to win it south of Macon," Bobby Rowan, a former state senator and former member of the Public Service Commission, told Galloway. Rowan, who lives in Enigma, population about 870, said those who think the Republican have a stranglehold on rural Georgia are incorrect. "We frankly don’t care anymore," he told Galloway. "Partisan politics has passed us. Now, I wouldn’t be surprised if Roy Barnes could roll up a 60 to 70 percent win in our county."
"Margins of that size, reached in multiple rural counties, could offset balloting from the Republican-dominated counties of metro Atlanta," Galloway writes. "A heavy turnout for Barnes in rural Georgia would essentially crack the super-majority of white voters required for statewide GOP victories." Rowan says the economy has labeled the playing field for Barnes after the 2002 flag controversy. "This whole election, it ain’t about a $3 tag, it ain’t about a chicken in every pot," he told Galloway. "It’s about a job for every man that’ll work. That’s the issue." Former Secretary of State Karen Handel and former Congressman Nathan Deal are in a runoff election for the Republican nomination.
Galloway writes that Barnes will be so focused on campaigning in rural precincts that he won't even return to Atlanta for an August visit from President Obama. "Sounds like a convenient excuse or a strategy -- avoiding association with a president who is unpopular with white voters in the state," says Al Cross, director of the Institute for Rural Journalism and Commuinity Issues, which publishes The Rural Blog. (Read more)
Monday, July 26, 2010
End of Saturday mail would hurt rural areas most
If the U.S. Postal Service follows through on its plan to end Saturday mail delivery, rural Americans may be among those hurt the most by the decision. The end to Saturday mail could be particularly painful for "rural customers who live far from post offices and depend on letter carriers for government checks, prescription medicines and parts for farming equipment," Ledyard King of Gannett Co.'s Washington, D.C., bureau reports. While post offices would remain open on Saturdays, for access to mailboxes, that may be "little solace to residents, especially the elderly, who live in remote areas underserved by the Internet," King writes.
"The very principle of the Postal Service is to give universal service to everybody. If they don’t do it, the people will lose that benefit in the rural areas," Paul Katzer, a letter carrier from Montrose, S.D., who serves 276 customers on his 130-mile route, told King. "The New York Citys, the Chicagos, if there’s a need for delivery service, there’s a company that will do it in those areas, but not out here. Rural America will be hurt by this." Groups that rely heavily on six-day service, including weekly newspapers and prescription mail-order companies, are protesting the proposal, but officials say the other "alternative is a significant across-the-board increase in postal rates and that would anger other users," King writes.
"Some people haven’t quite come to terms with that. Just because you go to five-day (delivery), it doesn’t mean the whole world collapses for them," Samuel Pulcrano, vice president of sustainability for the Postal Service, told King. "It’s simply a matter of adjusting." Chip Sawyer, program manager for the Center for Rural Studies at the University of Vermont, told King while the proposal will hurt rural communities they should focus their energy on pushing for greater electronic access, such as expansion of broadband services."It would be worse for rural areas if they were not provided with universal high-speed Internet access in the near future," he told King. "If one is to assume that rural residents are using the mail primarily for paying bills and corresponding socially, then it would seem that those who would lose out the most with the removal of Saturday delivery are those who have the hardest time connecting to and using current Internet options." (Read more)
"The very principle of the Postal Service is to give universal service to everybody. If they don’t do it, the people will lose that benefit in the rural areas," Paul Katzer, a letter carrier from Montrose, S.D., who serves 276 customers on his 130-mile route, told King. "The New York Citys, the Chicagos, if there’s a need for delivery service, there’s a company that will do it in those areas, but not out here. Rural America will be hurt by this." Groups that rely heavily on six-day service, including weekly newspapers and prescription mail-order companies, are protesting the proposal, but officials say the other "alternative is a significant across-the-board increase in postal rates and that would anger other users," King writes.
"Some people haven’t quite come to terms with that. Just because you go to five-day (delivery), it doesn’t mean the whole world collapses for them," Samuel Pulcrano, vice president of sustainability for the Postal Service, told King. "It’s simply a matter of adjusting." Chip Sawyer, program manager for the Center for Rural Studies at the University of Vermont, told King while the proposal will hurt rural communities they should focus their energy on pushing for greater electronic access, such as expansion of broadband services."It would be worse for rural areas if they were not provided with universal high-speed Internet access in the near future," he told King. "If one is to assume that rural residents are using the mail primarily for paying bills and corresponding socially, then it would seem that those who would lose out the most with the removal of Saturday delivery are those who have the hardest time connecting to and using current Internet options." (Read more)
Health-care expert creates roadmap of impact of reform legislation in rural America
A new publication from the Rural Policy Research Institute and the University of Iowa hopes to explain for rural-healh advocates the 900-plus page health care-reform legislation's effects on rural Americans. The publication, titled "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: A Summary of Provisions Important to Rural Health Care Delivery," was authored by Keith Mueller, director of RUPRI's Center for Rural Health Policy Analysis and head of the university's Department of Health Management and Policy, the North Liberty Leader reports. The summary can be accessed at http://cph.uiowa.edu/rupri.
The summary organizes the legislation into specific categories, including access to affordable insurance, insurance market reforms, quality improvement, public health, health-care workforce, Medicaid, Medicare and overall system changes. "This document creates a 'rural roadmap' for advocates, analysts, practitioners and policymakers as they continue the important task of improving the system as it affects rural interests," Mueller said. "During the legislative process, rural-conscious members of Congress succeeded in inserting provisions specific to rural needs, such as extending special payment policies in Medicare, extending and modifying the Rural Hospital Flexibility Program, and including rural areas in various demonstration projects and pilot programs. Their efforts are evident in this summary." (Read more)
The summary organizes the legislation into specific categories, including access to affordable insurance, insurance market reforms, quality improvement, public health, health-care workforce, Medicaid, Medicare and overall system changes. "This document creates a 'rural roadmap' for advocates, analysts, practitioners and policymakers as they continue the important task of improving the system as it affects rural interests," Mueller said. "During the legislative process, rural-conscious members of Congress succeeded in inserting provisions specific to rural needs, such as extending special payment policies in Medicare, extending and modifying the Rural Hospital Flexibility Program, and including rural areas in various demonstration projects and pilot programs. Their efforts are evident in this summary." (Read more)
Town that was home to first Homestead Act tract passes a new one to boost its tax revenue
The Homestead Act of 1862 was the federal government's vehicle for populating the West. Now towns across the country are re-examining similar strategies as a possible method for increasing tax revenue. Beatrice, Neb., home to the first federally recognized homestead in 1862, passed the "Homestead Act of 2010" in part to replenish its city coffers, Monica Davey of The New York Times reports. "The calculus is simple, if counterintuitive: hand out city land now to ensure property tax revenues in the future," Davey writes. Tobias J. Tempelmeyer, the city attorney, quipped, "There are only so many ball fields a place can build."
"Around the nation, cities and towns facing grim budget circumstances are grasping at unlikely — some would say desperate — means to bolster their shrunken tax bases," Davey writes. "Like Beatrice, places like Dayton, Ohio, and Grafton, Ill., are giving away land for nominal fees or for nothing in the hope that it will boost the tax rolls and cut the lawn-mowing bills." Despite recent signs of an economic recovery, municipalities may not emerge from the recession for several years because of slumping revenues from property taxes and sales taxes and reduced support from state governments. These areas are looking to other alternatives to raise money, including a controversial proposal in Manchester, N.H., and Concord, Mass., to re-examine the tax-exempt status of local non-profit organizations.
Beatrice was recognized as the home of the first Homestead Act application nearly 150 years ago when the federal government bought the property back to build a national monument, Davey reports. (NYT photo of Beatrice homestead monument by Kevin Moloney) While other small towns across the Great Plains have turned to homesteading in recent years to boost dwindling populations, Beatrice, whose population has held steady around 12,000 for decades, has a much different goal. "If the city were to give away just a few lots — and if people were to, as required by the law, build homes on them and stay for at least three years — Beatrice would secure annual real estate taxes on them, collect money for water, electric and sewer use, and no longer pay to mow the lawns," Davey writes. Since the act took effect in May, just two families have filled out homestead applications and both have since delayed plans to move. (Read more)
"Around the nation, cities and towns facing grim budget circumstances are grasping at unlikely — some would say desperate — means to bolster their shrunken tax bases," Davey writes. "Like Beatrice, places like Dayton, Ohio, and Grafton, Ill., are giving away land for nominal fees or for nothing in the hope that it will boost the tax rolls and cut the lawn-mowing bills." Despite recent signs of an economic recovery, municipalities may not emerge from the recession for several years because of slumping revenues from property taxes and sales taxes and reduced support from state governments. These areas are looking to other alternatives to raise money, including a controversial proposal in Manchester, N.H., and Concord, Mass., to re-examine the tax-exempt status of local non-profit organizations.
Gangs moving to rural areas
As estimated gang membership passes the 1 million mark nationally, gangs are no longer solely an urban phenomenon. "Gang members are fanning out from cities, looking for fresh recruits and new markets to sell drugs and guns," Raju Chebium of Gannett Co.'s Washington bureau reports. "Some flee to rural areas to hide from the police or other gangs." The Justice Department’s 2009 National Gang Threat Assessment reveals by 58 percent of all law enforcement agencies reported gang activity in their jurisdictions in 2008, up from 45 percent in 2004.
"We have seen gangs that were centered in one city become national," Attorney General Eric Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee in April. "We in law enforcement have to adapt to that and break old models, old ways of thinking. Gangs are not simply an urban phenomena any more." Ralph Weisheit, a criminal justice professor at Illinois State University, told Chebium that small-town gangs tend to be less violent than their urban counterparts and gang-related murders are rare in these groups.
Still, "Across rural America, authorities are stepping up enforcement when they see clear proof of gang-related crimes," Chebium writes. "In May, 600 federal, state and local law enforcement officers descended on Newburgh, N.Y., population 29,000, people, carrying 78 indictments naming members of the Bloods and the Latin Kings." Weisheit also questions the Justice Department's claim that gang membership has reached 1 million nationwide. He said "sometimes a "gang" is just a bunch of kids acting rowdy, wearing gang colors or imitating gang signs they see in the movies or on TV," Chebium writes. The key, Weisheit said, is learning how to distinguish a "gang from punkish behavior." (Read more)
"We have seen gangs that were centered in one city become national," Attorney General Eric Holder told the Senate Judiciary Committee in April. "We in law enforcement have to adapt to that and break old models, old ways of thinking. Gangs are not simply an urban phenomena any more." Ralph Weisheit, a criminal justice professor at Illinois State University, told Chebium that small-town gangs tend to be less violent than their urban counterparts and gang-related murders are rare in these groups.
Still, "Across rural America, authorities are stepping up enforcement when they see clear proof of gang-related crimes," Chebium writes. "In May, 600 federal, state and local law enforcement officers descended on Newburgh, N.Y., population 29,000, people, carrying 78 indictments naming members of the Bloods and the Latin Kings." Weisheit also questions the Justice Department's claim that gang membership has reached 1 million nationwide. He said "sometimes a "gang" is just a bunch of kids acting rowdy, wearing gang colors or imitating gang signs they see in the movies or on TV," Chebium writes. The key, Weisheit said, is learning how to distinguish a "gang from punkish behavior." (Read more)
Indiana electric cooperative agrees to cut air pollution, invest in alternative energy projects
A Southern Indiana rural electric cooperative has agreed to install state-of-the-art pollution control technology at its two coal-fired power plants as part of a settlement with the Justice Department and the Environmental Protection Agency. The settlement calls for Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative to pay a civil penalty of $950,000 and spend $5 million on environmental mitigation projects to address the impacts of past emissions, according to a press release. The settlement also requires Hoosier to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions by almost 20,000 tons per year and nitrogen oxide emissions by more than 1,800 tons at its Merom and Ratts plants.
Hoosier must direct $200,000 for projects to mitigate the harm caused by Hoosier's excess emissions at lands owned by the U.S. Forest Service. The remaining $4.8 million will be spent on one or more of the following projects: Tapping coal-bed methane to generate electricity and sending the resulting carbon dioxide to a greenhouse; sponsoring chaneouts and retrofits for wood-burning appliances; retrofitting public diesel engines with emission-control equipment; or installing solar power systems on public schools or facilities of non-profit groups. (Read more)
The co-op serves about 290,000 customers through 18 member cooperatives, one of them in southwestern Illinois.
Hoosier must direct $200,000 for projects to mitigate the harm caused by Hoosier's excess emissions at lands owned by the U.S. Forest Service. The remaining $4.8 million will be spent on one or more of the following projects: Tapping coal-bed methane to generate electricity and sending the resulting carbon dioxide to a greenhouse; sponsoring chaneouts and retrofits for wood-burning appliances; retrofitting public diesel engines with emission-control equipment; or installing solar power systems on public schools or facilities of non-profit groups. (Read more)
The co-op serves about 290,000 customers through 18 member cooperatives, one of them in southwestern Illinois.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Black president from Hawaii needs more blacks from rural South near him, black Democrats say
We rarely take major note of opinion columns, but when they make assertions of fact that ring true and at least offer a fresh perspective, as Maureen Dowd does about the White House and race in The New York Times today, we make an exception.
The issue is the Obama admimistration's summary ouster of Shirley Sherrod from her job as the Department of Agriculture's Rural Developent director for Georgia, and Dowd's best source appears to be Rep. James Clyburn, the No. 3 Democrat in the House and, for our money, one of the most solid people in Congress. Clyburn represents most of rural lowland South Carolina (NationalAtlas.gov map).
“I don’t think a single black person was consulted before Shirley Sherrod was fired — I mean, c’mon,” Clyburn told Dowd – who calls him “so temperate that he agreed with an op-ed piece in The Wall Street Journal on Friday by Senator James Webb of Virginia, which urged that 'government-directed diversity programs should end.'” (Actually, Webb said they should be continued for African Americans.) Here's Clyburn's punch line: “The president’s getting hurt real bad. He needs some black people around him.”
Dowd notes that Obama was "raised in the Hawaiian hood and Indonesia," and writes, "Unlike Bill Clinton, who never needed help fathoming Southern black culture, Obama lacks advisers who are descended from the central African-American experience. . . . The West Wing white guys who pushed to ditch Shirley Sherrod before Glenn Beck could pounce not only didn’t bother to Google, they weren’t familiar enough with civil rights history to recognize the name Sherrod. And they didn’t return the calls and e-mail of prominent blacks who tried to alert them that something was wrong. Charles Sherrod, Shirley’s husband, was a Freedom Rider who ... was a key member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee."
Implicitly dismissing Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack's contention that he made the decision on his own, without consulting the White House, Dowd writes of Obama, "His closest advisers — some of the same ones who urged him not to make the race speech after the Rev. Jeremiah Wright issue exploded — are so terrified that Fox [News] and the Tea Party will paint Obama as doing more for blacks that they tiptoe around and do less." Vilsack has offered Sherrod a civil-rights job in USDA, or her old job; Dowd has another suggestion for Obama: "He should give her a new job: Director of Black Outreach. This White House needs one." (Read more)
The issue is the Obama admimistration's summary ouster of Shirley Sherrod from her job as the Department of Agriculture's Rural Developent director for Georgia, and Dowd's best source appears to be Rep. James Clyburn, the No. 3 Democrat in the House and, for our money, one of the most solid people in Congress. Clyburn represents most of rural lowland South Carolina (NationalAtlas.gov map).
Dowd notes that Obama was "raised in the Hawaiian hood and Indonesia," and writes, "Unlike Bill Clinton, who never needed help fathoming Southern black culture, Obama lacks advisers who are descended from the central African-American experience. . . . The West Wing white guys who pushed to ditch Shirley Sherrod before Glenn Beck could pounce not only didn’t bother to Google, they weren’t familiar enough with civil rights history to recognize the name Sherrod. And they didn’t return the calls and e-mail of prominent blacks who tried to alert them that something was wrong. Charles Sherrod, Shirley’s husband, was a Freedom Rider who ... was a key member of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee."
Implicitly dismissing Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack's contention that he made the decision on his own, without consulting the White House, Dowd writes of Obama, "His closest advisers — some of the same ones who urged him not to make the race speech after the Rev. Jeremiah Wright issue exploded — are so terrified that Fox [News] and the Tea Party will paint Obama as doing more for blacks that they tiptoe around and do less." Vilsack has offered Sherrod a civil-rights job in USDA, or her old job; Dowd has another suggestion for Obama: "He should give her a new job: Director of Black Outreach. This White House needs one." (Read more)
Treaty rules could stop exports of burley tobacco
The variety is burley, which is the main type of tobacco grown in Kentucky, Tennessee and some other states. "Because of its harsh characteristics, burley requires the use of flavorings and processing ingredients as it is blended with other tobaccos," Carroll notes. But cigarettes could contain nothing but tobacco, under regulations that the World Health Organization is developing under an international tobacco treaty that the U.S. has signed but not ratified. The regulations are on the agenda for a November meeting.
Nearly three-fourths of U.S. burley is exported, but the proposed regulations would effctively ban its export, U.S. Rep. Ed Whitfield of Kentucky's 1st District told Carroll. He and all but one other member of the state's congressional delegation (Rep. John Yarmuith, D-Louisville) are fighting the proposal. Kentucky is the nation's leading producer of burley, generating $274 million last year for 5,000 to 10,000 farmers.
The regulations are designed to make it more difficult for cigarettes manufacturres to make their product appealing to children. Roger Quarles, president of the Burley Tobacco Growers Cooperative Association, said those pushing the rules "want it to taste like you-know-what so you would be less inclined to use it.” (Read more)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)