State laws prevent nurse practitioners and physician assistants from using a federal license to prescribe potentially life-saving medicine for opioid addiction, Christine Vestal reports for Stateline. Earlier this month two federal agencies—Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration and the Drug Enforcement Administration—"gave more than 700 nurse practitioners and physician assistants the authority to write prescriptions for the anti-addiction medication buprenorphine."
But 28 states "prohibit nurse practitioners from prescribing buprenorphine unless they are working in collaboration with a doctor who also has a federal license to prescribe it," Vestal writes. The problem is that half of all counties in the U.S., mainly in rural areas, "do not have a single physician with a license to prescribe buprenorphine." (Stateline map: Barriers for nurse practitioners to prescribe treatment for opioid addiction)
Oklahoma, Tennessee and Wyoming have laws that "explicitly prohibit nurse practitioners from prescribing buprenorphine—one of three anti-addiction medications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration—with or without a doctor’s supervision," Vestal notes. A law in Kentucky prohibits physician assistants from prescribing it.
In the 15 years since doctors have been allowed to prescribe buprenorphine, fewer than 39,000 have sought a license to do so, Vestal writes. Overall, there are "more than 222,000 nurse practitioners and about 109,000 physician assistants in the nation, and many of them offer primary health care in rural parts of the nation where the opioid crisis is most acute."
A digest of events, trends, issues, ideas and journalism from and about rural America, by the Institute for Rural Journalism, based at the University of Kentucky. Links may expire, require subscription or go behind pay walls. Please send news and knowledge you think would be useful to benjy.hamm@uky.edu.
Friday, April 21, 2017
State licensing laws bar treatment of opioid addiction, especially in areas that lack doctors
Labels:
doctor shortages,
doctors,
drug abuse,
drug prevention,
drug treatment,
drugs,
health,
prescription drug,
rural health,
rural-urban disparities
Rise of wind energy in Iowa creating a divide among rural residents
Iowa has become a national leader in wind power, but not everyone is celebrating the state's success, Donnelle Eller and Kevin Hardy report for The Des Moines Register. Clean energy has led to hundreds of jobs, property tax revenues "and $20 million annually that farmers and rural landowners earn in lease payments for hosting the giant turbines." The state's growing amount of green energy—Iowa leads the nation with 37 percent of its annual electricity portfolio—also has helped attract billions of dollars in capital investment from Facebook, Microsoft and Google data centers.
"But Iowa's growing energy harvest has birthed a new wave of opposition from critics who call wind turbines noisy, over-subsidized eyesores that can be dangerous," reports the Register. "And groups have popped up across Iowa seeking to stop local wind development. Opponents elsewhere have raised familiar arguments against wind farms, from the tax credits they receive to the birds and bats they kill. Landowners have long objected to offshore wind development near pricey coastal real estate."
Concern has grown especially in rural areas, notes the Register. The rural debate "has intensified over wind's merits, drawing comparisons to the hotly contested hog confinements that pockmark Iowa's soybean and corn fields—and foul the air and water, detractors say." (Register graphic: Wind energy in the U.S.)
Some say wind energy can revitalize Iowa's rural towns, which since 1969 have lost more than 171,000 residents. During that same time the state's urban areas gained nearly 500,000 people, reports the Register. Daryl Haack, an Iowa farmer who receives about $20,000 annually in lease payments for two turbines, told the Register, "Rural Iowa needs something to put money and people back into the community."
Others "say they feel betrayed by the actions of neighbors and county officials who they believe have sold out to energy firms by allowing an influx of wind turbines across the landscape," reports the Register. Mason Fleenor, a cattle producer who said he and his wife built their dream home seven years ago in Ida County and planned to retire there, told the Register, "They're just greedy. I'd move if I could."
"But Iowa's growing energy harvest has birthed a new wave of opposition from critics who call wind turbines noisy, over-subsidized eyesores that can be dangerous," reports the Register. "And groups have popped up across Iowa seeking to stop local wind development. Opponents elsewhere have raised familiar arguments against wind farms, from the tax credits they receive to the birds and bats they kill. Landowners have long objected to offshore wind development near pricey coastal real estate."
Concern has grown especially in rural areas, notes the Register. The rural debate "has intensified over wind's merits, drawing comparisons to the hotly contested hog confinements that pockmark Iowa's soybean and corn fields—and foul the air and water, detractors say." (Register graphic: Wind energy in the U.S.)
Others "say they feel betrayed by the actions of neighbors and county officials who they believe have sold out to energy firms by allowing an influx of wind turbines across the landscape," reports the Register. Mason Fleenor, a cattle producer who said he and his wife built their dream home seven years ago in Ida County and planned to retire there, told the Register, "They're just greedy. I'd move if I could."
Labels:
agriculture,
electricity,
renewable energy,
rural-urban disparities,
taxes,
wind,
wind power
Farm Foundation Forum on NAFTA's future rescheduled for April 26
The Farm Foundation Forum, "The Future of the North American Free Trade Agreement," has been rescheduled for 9-11 a.m. ET on April 26. It will be held at the National Press Club in Washington. It also will be available via audiocast and archived on the Farm Foundation website.
Panel members will include: Bob Stallman, a Texas farmer and former president of the American Farm Bureau Federation; Melissa San Miguel, senior director of global strategies for the Grocery Manufacturers Association; and Linda Dempsey, vice president of international economic affairs with the National Association of Manufacturers.
There is no fee to participate, but registration is requested. Register here if you plan to attend in person; register here for the live audiocast.
Panel members will include: Bob Stallman, a Texas farmer and former president of the American Farm Bureau Federation; Melissa San Miguel, senior director of global strategies for the Grocery Manufacturers Association; and Linda Dempsey, vice president of international economic affairs with the National Association of Manufacturers.
There is no fee to participate, but registration is requested. Register here if you plan to attend in person; register here for the live audiocast.
Aging population in Maine, the nation's oldest and whitest state, impacting workforce
![]() |
| Washington County, Maine (Wikipedia map) |
For example, Charles Rudelitch, executive director of the Sunrise County Economic Council in Washington County, told Wang, "We have a lot people who are at their prime earning years, in their 50s and early 60s, and they're beginning to retire."
One solution could be immigrants, Wang writes. A Pew Research Center study found that "new immigrants will be the main drivers of growth in the U.S. workforce through 2035." Immigrants, mainly Somali and Sudanese refugees, have migrated to Maine's largest cities, but have been slower to relocate to the state's rural areas. Latinos only make up one percent of the state's population, although some towns, like Washington County's Milbridge with six percent of the population Latino, have seen higher numbers.
Not everyone in Maine has been welcoming to immigrants, Wang writes. "About a decade ago, tensions over new immigrants settling in Milbridge spilled over. There was a legal battle over building a small apartment complex for local farmworkers, most of whom are Hispanic, after voters approved a moratorium on multi-family units. The apartments were eventually built."
Annie Sokoloski, an office manager in Steuben, Maine, located in Washington County, "sees newcomers to Milbridge as a welcome addition, especially at job fairs and other recruiting events," Wang reports. "Still, she says she is concerned about the future of Down East Maine's economy." She told him, "It's disheartening. It's going to be more of a retirement-type area. There's nothing to really sustain a long-term growth of a younger generation." Sokoloski said after she retires she'll probably move away.
Labels:
employment,
immigration,
jobs,
Latinos,
migration,
population,
retirement,
rural-urban disparities
Rural Mainstreet Index dips in April, remains negative for 20th straight month
The Rural Mainstreet Index in April remained below 50, on a 0-100 scale, for the 20h straight month, indicating economic weakness in the 10-state region that stretches from Illinois to Wyoming and is dependent on agriculture and energy. Creighton University economist Ernie Goss surveys bank CEOs in rural areas of Colorado, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Wyoming and the Dakotas.
The index in April was 44.6, down from 45.3 in March and 45.8 in February, which was the highest since it reached 49 in September 2015. Farmland prices declined for the 41st straight month, "but the percent of cash farmland sales remained steady from 2015," Goss writes. He notes that loan volume soared to a record level as banks rejected fewer loan applications and almost one-third of bankers indicated "no change in lending practices stemming from the downturn in the farm economy." He writes, "for 2017, bank CEOs expect approximate cash expenses to exceed cash revenues for 17.1 percent of grain farmers, down from 19.5 percent in 2016."
Goss said, "Weak farm commodity prices continue to squeeze Rural Mainstreet economies. Over the last 12 months, livestock commodity prices have tumbled by 5.8 percent and grain commodity prices have slumped by 4.5 percent. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is estimating 2017 will mark the fourth consecutive year that farm income has declined. This downward trend has pushed our survey results into negative territory,” (Creighton graphic: Rural Mainstreet Index)
The index in April was 44.6, down from 45.3 in March and 45.8 in February, which was the highest since it reached 49 in September 2015. Farmland prices declined for the 41st straight month, "but the percent of cash farmland sales remained steady from 2015," Goss writes. He notes that loan volume soared to a record level as banks rejected fewer loan applications and almost one-third of bankers indicated "no change in lending practices stemming from the downturn in the farm economy." He writes, "for 2017, bank CEOs expect approximate cash expenses to exceed cash revenues for 17.1 percent of grain farmers, down from 19.5 percent in 2016."
Goss said, "Weak farm commodity prices continue to squeeze Rural Mainstreet economies. Over the last 12 months, livestock commodity prices have tumbled by 5.8 percent and grain commodity prices have slumped by 4.5 percent. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is estimating 2017 will mark the fourth consecutive year that farm income has declined. This downward trend has pushed our survey results into negative territory,” (Creighton graphic: Rural Mainstreet Index)
Labels:
agriculture,
economy,
energy,
farming,
landowners,
real estate
National Health Security Preparedness Index ranks states; Vermont most prepared, Alaska least
How prepared is your state for a public health emergency? The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation has released the results of its 2017 National Health Security Preparedness Index, which uses more than 130 measures—such as hazard planning in public schools, monitoring food and water safety, wireless 9-1-1 capabilities, flu vaccination rates, and numbers of paramedics and hospitals—from 59 sources to rank states in six categories: health security surveillance; community planning and engagement; incident and information management; health-care delivery; countermeasure management; and environmental and occupational health.
States were ranked on a 10-point scale, with the national average being 6.8, a 1.5 percent increase over last year and 6.3 percent increase since the index was created four years ago. Vermont led the way with a score of 7.8, while Alaska had the worst score, 5.9. Many Southern states—Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina—were below average, along with Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming.
Joining Vermont with above average scores were Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. (For an interactive version of the index click here)
States were ranked on a 10-point scale, with the national average being 6.8, a 1.5 percent increase over last year and 6.3 percent increase since the index was created four years ago. Vermont led the way with a score of 7.8, while Alaska had the worst score, 5.9. Many Southern states—Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina—were below average, along with Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Montana, New Mexico, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas and Wyoming.
Joining Vermont with above average scores were Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. (For an interactive version of the index click here)
Labels:
accidents,
community development,
disasters,
emergency services,
environment,
health,
health care,
hospitals,
occupational disease
Thursday, April 20, 2017
Advocates fear 'crisis in rural counties' if Affordable Care Act marketplaces aren't stable in 2018
![]() |
| Click on map to view a larger version of it |
In 2017 about 41 percent of rural counties had only one Obamacare health insurer, Roubein notes. There is fear that "without certainty, insurers could exit marketplaces, leaving rural areas without any carriers," she writes. "Rural hospitals could then be tasked with providing care to a population that could be increasingly uninsured." Cynthia Cox, associate director of Kaiser Family Foundation’s Program for the Study of Health Reform and Private Insurance, told Roubein, "It really does all come down to that one company's decision about whether to stay or go."
House Republicans are trying to revive their bill to repeal and replace Obamacare, which fell apart last month. "Meanwhile, insurers are readying their rates for plan year 2018 and want to know that they’ll continue to receive payments for providing their consumers with cost-sharing reduction subsidies," Roubein reports. "The White House hasn’t been particularly clear on what it will do, as Trump floated the possibility of ending the payments to force Democrats to the healthcare negotiating table. Health executives met a top Trump health official on Tuesday but came out with no assurances."
Labels:
health,
health care,
Obamacare,
Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act,
rural health,
rural-urban disparities
Big crowds at national parks in recent years leading to an increase in emergency situations
![]() |
| Big crowds at Old Faithful at Yellowstone National Park (National Park Service photo by Neal Herbert) |
Norma Nickerson, director of the Institute for Tourism and Recreation Research at the University of Montana, said "many park managers are now having to deal with the same emergency situations as cities that have a police force and other city departments to manage the problem," Erickson writes.
Nickerson, who recently published a report on overcrowding at national parks, said Glacier saw a 20 percent increase in visitors last year. Also, visitors were up 23 percent at Crater Lake National Park, 20 percent at Yosemite National Park, 18 percent at Zion National Park and 13 percent at Arches National Park. While two of the most popular national parks, the Grand Canyon National Park and Yellowstone only saw increases of eight and four percent in 2016, that's up from increases of 17 and 16 percent in 2015.
At Yellowstone, search and rescue incidents increased 61 percent in 2015, injuries were up 167 percent, emergency medical responses were up 37 percent and Life Flight evacuations were up 25 percent, Erickson notes. Last year nearly three million people visited Glacier, where it's not uncommon in July and August for some parking lots to be filled up by 11 a.m. and many campgrounds to be fully booked every day during those two months.
Labels:
adventure tourism,
national parks,
public safety,
safety,
tourism
TVA says it won't reopen coal-fired power plants, but Trump could change the utility's board soon
![]() |
| Tennessee Valley Authority area |
TVA says on its website that it provides electricity for nine million customers in Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. Trump has promised to revive the coal industry.
Johnson said cheaper natural gas, not Obama administration regulations, is responsible for the downturn in coal, so retiring coal plants is the cheapest way to serve customers, Mattise reports. "Our statutory duty is to produce electricity at the lowest feasible rate. And when we decided to close the coal plants, that was the math we were doing. We weren't trying to comply with the Clean Power Plan or anything else," Johnson said. "What's the cheapest way to serve the customer? It turned out to be retiring those coal plants."
Mattise reports, "Johnson acknowledged that Trump could try to change the direction of the agency. By May, Trump can fill five of nine TVA board slots to establish a new majority." Those nominees would need to be confirmed by the Senate. Johnson said "TVA hasn't had direct discussions with the administration about the agency's direction or been invited to meet top administration officials yet."
Labels:
Appalachia,
coal,
electricity,
federal government,
jobs,
mining,
natural gas,
rural-urban disparities
Trump remains silent on expiring benefits for retired coal miners; benefits to expire April 28
![]() |
| David Van Sickle, who has black lung, stands to lose benefits (NYT photo by Maddie McGarvey) |
About 23,000 former United Mine Workers of America miners or their widows will lose their health care and pensions on April 28, unless Congress intervenes through legislation to keep the government funded, Dylan Brown reports for Greenwire. "Health funds for more than 120,000 total retirees face the same threat down the road."
Scheiber reports, "Responsibility for the retirees’ health plans has increasingly shifted to the federal government in recent years, as struggling coal companies have shed their liabilities in bankruptcy court. Congress voted last fall to finance benefits for a large group of retirees for several months, but House and Senate Republican leaders have yet to agree on a longer-term solution."
"The benefits can easily mean the difference between a middle-class retirement and economic hardship, since many retired miners are too young to qualify for Medicare," Scheiber notes. "Others have chronic or debilitating health problems that would require expensive supplemental coverage—currently provided by the retiree plan—even with the Medicare benefit." VanSickle said he "priced out a private insurance plan that would provide roughly comparable benefits for him and his wife, who takes about a dozen separate medications to treat lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. The estimates came in at $1,500 to $1,800 per month."
Van Sickle said many retired miners who supported Trump "understood that his promise to revive employment in their industry was a long shot in the face of cheap natural gas," Scheiber reports. "But they believed their wish was a modest one. The price tag for their benefits averages a little under $200 million per year over the next 10 years, which can be partly offset through interest that accrues in a federal fund for reclaiming abandoned mines. Because no new miners would become eligible for the health benefits awarded to this group, the cost would eventually dwindle to zero."
Labels:
Appalachia,
coal,
employment,
jobs,
labor unions,
mining,
retirement,
strip mining,
surface mining,
unions
Nebraska farmers look to derail Keystone XL pipeline by arguing it threatens state's farmland
![]() |
| Canadian Press graphic |
The group fighting the pipeline is "fine-tuning an economic argument it hopes will resonate better in this politically conservative state than the environmental concerns that dominated the successful push to block Keystone under former President Obama," Volcovici writes. Backed by conservation groups, they "plan to cast the project as a threat to prime farming and grazing lands—vital to Nebraska's economy—and a foreign company's attempt to seize American private property. They contend the pipeline will provide mainly temporary jobs that will vanish once construction ends, and limited tax revenues that will decline over time."
They aren't getting much support from government officials, Volcovici reports. Republican Gov. Pete Ricketts, most of the state’s lawmakers, its labor unions and Chamber of Commerce all support the pipeline.
"TransCanada has route approval in all of the U.S. states the line will cross except Nebraska, where the company says it has been unable to negotiate easements with landowners on about 9 percent of the 300-mile crossing," Volcovici reports. "So the dispute now falls to Nebraska's five-member utility commission, an elected board with independent authority over TransCanada’s proposed route. The commission has scheduled a public hearing in May, along with a week of testimony by pipeline supporters and opponents in August. Members face a deadline set by state law to take a vote by November."
Labels:
air pollution,
energy,
environment,
natural gas,
oil,
pipelines,
pollution,
president,
water pollution
Rising sea levels caused by climate change could displace 13.1 million in U.S. by 2100, says study
Rising sea levels, due to climate change, could lead millions of U.S. residents to migrate away from areas near oceans, says a study by a University of Georgia researcher published in the journal of Nature Climate Change. Mathew Hauer, author of the study and head of the Applied Demography program at the University of Georgia, said even landlocked states "could see could see significant increases in population because of coastal migration by 2100," Tom James reports for Reuters.
In January the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration "predicted a 1-to-8-foot (0.3-2.5 meter) increase in sea levels by the year 2100," James writes. "Previous research by Hauer and others has put the number of Americans displaced by rising seas over the same period as high as 13.1 million."
Hauer "found that Nevada's Clark County, home to Las Vegas, is projected to see an influx of up to 117,000 climate migrants by the end of the century, and nearly every county in Wyoming is predicted to see some increase, as are many counties in western Montana, central Colorado and northern Utah," notes James. (Study graphic of estimated net migration by county because of rising sea levels)
Hauer "found that Nevada's Clark County, home to Las Vegas, is projected to see an influx of up to 117,000 climate migrants by the end of the century, and nearly every county in Wyoming is predicted to see some increase, as are many counties in western Montana, central Colorado and northern Utah," notes James. (Study graphic of estimated net migration by county because of rising sea levels)
Labels:
climate change,
global warming,
migration,
oceans,
weather
At request of oil and gas industry, EPA will review Obama administration methane-emission rules
In response to a petition from oil and gas industry groups, the Environmental Protection Agency announced plans to "reconsider Clean Air Act regulations that directly limit emissions of methane, a potent greenhouse gas," Hannah Hess reports for Greenwire. The Texas Oil and Gas Association, the American Petroleum Institute and other industry groups "criticized the potential costs of the regulations and called them unnecessary."
"Environmentalists argue that the regulations played a vital role in falling rates of methane emissions during the Obama administration," Hess writes. "EPA actions against methane were a key part of the Obama administration's goal of lowering emissions from the oil and gas industry between 40 and 45 percent by 2025 compared with 2012 levels." The rule was set to go into effect on June 3.
In May 2016, Coral Davenport of The New York Times wrote: "EPA estimates that the rules will cost companies around $530 million in 2025, but it also estimates that they will yield companies savings of as much as $690 million from reduced waste, a potential net benefit of $160 million. The agency said the regulations would lower methane emissions by 510,000 tons in 2025, the equivalent of 11 million metric tons of carbon dioxide."
"Environmentalists argue that the regulations played a vital role in falling rates of methane emissions during the Obama administration," Hess writes. "EPA actions against methane were a key part of the Obama administration's goal of lowering emissions from the oil and gas industry between 40 and 45 percent by 2025 compared with 2012 levels." The rule was set to go into effect on June 3.
In May 2016, Coral Davenport of The New York Times wrote: "EPA estimates that the rules will cost companies around $530 million in 2025, but it also estimates that they will yield companies savings of as much as $690 million from reduced waste, a potential net benefit of $160 million. The agency said the regulations would lower methane emissions by 510,000 tons in 2025, the equivalent of 11 million metric tons of carbon dioxide."
Labels:
air pollution,
energy,
environment,
fracking,
hydraulic fracturing,
methane,
natural gas,
oil,
pollution
Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Eliminating Essential Air Service would have a big impact in Michigan, second to Alaska in subsidies
One of the programs that would be eliminated under President Trump's proposed budget is Essential Air Service, "which last year subsidized commercial flights to 173 rural airports at a cost of about $283 million," Melissa Nann Burke reports for The Detroit News. Michigan, which Trump carried in the November election, ranks second behind Alaska in most communities supported by the program. The state would lose federal subsidies that provide service to nine of its most isolated airports. Last year in Michigan subsidies per passenger ranged from $23 to $366.
"Advocates contend that discontinuing the subsidies could harm tourism and business development in northern Michigan, where the nine airports are located, including five in the Upper Peninsula," Burke writes. "The Trump administration says the program wastes taxpayer dollars on mostly empty flights to places that are within driving distance of larger airports. Other critics of the Essential Air Service say fears about cutting off rural communities from the rest of the world are overblown." The end of the program would not mean closure of airports, regional airport directors say, because they have many corporate and general-aviation users.
Congress created the program in the 1970s to ensure air service to small communities would continue. "The program is funded in part by overflight fees—$108 million last year—paid to the federal government by foreign aircraft that fly through U.S. airspace," Burke reports. "The remainder comes from discretionary appropriations by Congress, which set aside $175 million last fiscal year. Lawmakers have since narrowed the program’s scope, but spending has increased more than 132 percent since 2008, adjusting for inflation, in part because of rising fuel costs, according to a March report by the Congressional Research Service."
The service is especially important in states like Alaska, where in some cases there are no roads "to connect people to a larger hub where they can get medical care, prescriptions and groceries, air travel is a part of everyday life," Annie Zak reports for Alaska Dispatch News. The Alaska Department of Transportation said about 82 percent of the state's communities are not connected to the road system. John Binder, deputy state transportation commissioner for aviation, told Zak that a total of 230 Alaska communities are eligible for the program, though not all participate.
Alaska gets about $21 million in federal subsidies from the program, Burke writes. "Without the Essential Air Service program, carriers speculate that ticket prices might go up and service frequency might go down, if regular flight service remains in such remote hamlets at all."
"Advocates contend that discontinuing the subsidies could harm tourism and business development in northern Michigan, where the nine airports are located, including five in the Upper Peninsula," Burke writes. "The Trump administration says the program wastes taxpayer dollars on mostly empty flights to places that are within driving distance of larger airports. Other critics of the Essential Air Service say fears about cutting off rural communities from the rest of the world are overblown." The end of the program would not mean closure of airports, regional airport directors say, because they have many corporate and general-aviation users.
Congress created the program in the 1970s to ensure air service to small communities would continue. "The program is funded in part by overflight fees—$108 million last year—paid to the federal government by foreign aircraft that fly through U.S. airspace," Burke reports. "The remainder comes from discretionary appropriations by Congress, which set aside $175 million last fiscal year. Lawmakers have since narrowed the program’s scope, but spending has increased more than 132 percent since 2008, adjusting for inflation, in part because of rising fuel costs, according to a March report by the Congressional Research Service."
The service is especially important in states like Alaska, where in some cases there are no roads "to connect people to a larger hub where they can get medical care, prescriptions and groceries, air travel is a part of everyday life," Annie Zak reports for Alaska Dispatch News. The Alaska Department of Transportation said about 82 percent of the state's communities are not connected to the road system. John Binder, deputy state transportation commissioner for aviation, told Zak that a total of 230 Alaska communities are eligible for the program, though not all participate.
Alaska gets about $21 million in federal subsidies from the program, Burke writes. "Without the Essential Air Service program, carriers speculate that ticket prices might go up and service frequency might go down, if regular flight service remains in such remote hamlets at all."
Labels:
air service,
Congress,
federal government,
federal spending,
rural-urban disparities,
transportation
Horses allow Border Patrol agents to cover areas vehicles are unable to traverse
![]() |
| Horse border patrols in La Grulla, Texas (New York Times photo by Todd Heisler) |
The Border Patrol’s Rio Grande Valley Sector Horse Unit, formed in 2011, has about 40 horses "obtained from a wild mustang program run by the federal Bureau of Land Management," Nixon writes. "The agency catches horses and turns them over for basic training to inmates at the Hutchinson Correctional Facility in Kansas."
Inmates at Hutchinson have been training horses since 2001, says the Kansas Department of Corrections. The facility has the ability to house up to 499 horses. "Through a cooperative agreement with the BLM, a dozen minimum-custody inmates care and train the wild horses with the goal of making them suitable for adoption. The program also provides inmate work opportunities that help inmates reintegrate back into the community." Each May, the prison holds a horse auction, with sales going to continue the program’s funding. Horses not adopted are transferred to long-term holding locations.
Nixon notes, "Since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, the U.S. has spent over $100 billion on various border-security technology, including ground sensors, video cameras, walls, layers of fencing and infrared cameras. But in the thicket along the river where smugglers can easily hide, the horse patrol unit plays an essential role in efforts to detect illegal activity." The number of illegal immigrants caught in South Texas has dropped in the past few months from 600 per day to 100, largely because of aggressive enforcement under President Trump and improving conditions in countries people are fleeing.
Labels:
border security,
horses,
immigration,
Mexico,
rural-urban disparities
Fast-food chains are phasing out antibiotics in chickens, but are slow to do so in beef and pork
![]() |
| It's more difficult to ensure that cattle and swine are raised without antibiotics (Tribune photo: Antonio Perez) |
McDonald's said it's difficult to monitor cows and pigs, because they often move from farm to farm, leading to a "lack of traceability," Bomkamp writes. Also, McDonald's "buys beef from thousands of ranches, each with an average of just 50 cows," while there are only two main U.S. suppliers of chicken. McDonald's said that with chickens, it "has a clear line of sight from farm to table."
McDonald's also claimed "it could see meat shortages if it moves too quickly to antibiotic-free pork and beef," Bomkamp reports. "While chicken are slaughtered in just weeks, cattle can be two years old when they go to market, leaving far more time in which an animal can get sick. That raises the likelihood that a farmer would need to use antibiotics, even if they weren't using them routinely in the animal's feed as is commonplace in many industrial farms."
According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration "more than 70 percent of antibiotics important to human medicine in the U.S. are sold for livestock use," Bomkamp writes. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization "have said the overuse of antibiotics has led to a global health crisis because the more people are exposed to them, the less effective they are."
Labels:
agriculture,
antibiotics,
cattle,
food,
food safety,
hogs,
pigs
Texas lawmakers want more research conducted before pesticides used in 'hog apocalypse'
![]() |
| Feral hogs (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service photo) |
Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller in February "announced an emergency state rule change allowing the use of the warfarin-based poison Kaput, which was recently approved by the Environmental Protection Agency to kill wild pigs," Smith writes. The state's feral hogs, which are blamed for eating newborn lambs, uprooting crops and trampling parks and highways, are estimated to cause $50 million in damage per year.
When pigs eat the pesticide, "it kills them slowly, often painfully and turns their innards blue. It’s already wiped out swine herds in Australia, which later banned the product as inhumane," Avi Selk reported in March for The Washington Post.
Labels:
agriculture,
animal control,
animal disease,
animal welfare,
hogs,
pesticides,
pigs
Coal company says it wants to turn E. Ky. strip mine site into Appalachia's largest solar farm
![]() |
| Berkeley Energy Group photo of mine site |
The Berkeley Energy Group said the project, which is still in the early stages, would be the first large-scale solar project in Appalachia. It didn't say how much the project would cost; former state auditor Adam Edelen, who is involved, told The Rural Blog that it would require "tens of millions in capital investments and will be largely determined by the size of the project," which is still under evaluation. The key funding partner is EDF Renewable Energy, a major company.
Eastern Kentucky doesn't get as much sunlight as much of the nation, and has not been considered a hot spot for solar development. However, it gets as much as Germany, which is "the solar leader," Edelen said. One key to the project, he said, will be its access to eastern energy markets through PJM Interconnection, the regional electric-transmission organization that reaches as far as Newark and Norfolk. "Without PJM it would be much more difficult," Edelen said.
Ryan Johns, BEG project development executive, told James Bruggers of The Courier-Journal, "We are not looking at this as trying to replace coal, but we have already extracted the coal from this area." Edelen said the site is about 10 miles east of Pikeville, near Bent Mountain.
Labels:
Appalachia,
coal,
electricity,
employment,
jobs,
mining,
renewable energy,
rural-urban disparities,
solar power,
strip mining,
surface mining
Declining wolf populations lead to explosion of moose on Isle Royale, posing possible problems
![]() |
| National Park Service map |
During their annual study, scientists counted only two wolves and 1,600 moose, Stefanie Sidortsova reports for Michigan Tech News. John Vucetich, a professor of ecology at Michigan Tech and co-author of the study, said a lack of wolves could lead the moose population to double over the next three to four years. He said more moose means more vegetation is eaten, which would deplete food supplies.
Scientists also fear that without predators cutting their numbers, moose are overeating the park's balsam fir trees, John Flesher reports for The Associated Press. Rolf Peterson, a research professor at Michigan Tech, said "balsam fir is the predominant tree of Isle Royale and has long characterized its landscape." He told AP, "It's a race between the slowly growing trees and the rapidly growing moose."
Wolf numbers have plummeted since 2009, from 24 to 2, Sidortsova writes. The decline is largely blamed on inbreeding. The two remaining wolves, which are believed to be father and daughter, have mated before, but are not expected to reproduce again. The National Park Service in 2016 published a proposal that includes reintroducing 20 to 30 wolves in the next three to five years. A final decision is expected in the fall.
Tuesday, April 18, 2017
Immigrant farmers stand to lose loans and funds for training, under budget proposed by Trump
![]() |
| Yakima County, Washington (Wikipedia map) |
According to the most recent U.S. Department of Agriculture census, in 2012, Yakima County "produced $1.65 billion of agricultural products," Oates writes. Yakima County leads the nation in in apple acreage, revenue from hops production and sweet cherry production, and is seventh in revenue from milk production and 15th in wine grape acreage.
Yakima County's Center for Latino Farmers, which only serves U.S. citizens or legal immigrants, provides resources and training for local farmers, Oates reports. It's part of Rural Community Development Resources and "is highly dependent upon federal grants and partnerships to serve the non-farming population." The center is a certified Department of Treasury Community Development Financial Institution and its staff and technical assistance resources are supported by the Economic Development Administration. A portion of the loan funding they provide to entrepreneurs comes from the Small Business Administration. Oates notes that all of these federal programs have been slated to be cut or eliminated by Trump.
Maria Giedra, outreach specialist for the center, told Oates, "The people we assist are looking for capital, loans for land and also for operating capital. We help them find loans from the Farm Services Agency, help them understand what program is best for them." The center also "serves farmers with education, technical assistance, and support for enrolling in USDA programs. They hold meetings and training on crop production, record-keeping, post-harvest handling of farm outputs, and regulations that affect their farms."
Labels:
agriculture,
education,
farming,
federal spending,
Hispanics,
immigration,
job training,
rural-urban disparities
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
















