"Many poor, rural whites have legitimate reasons to distrust the health care system — and real barriers to access," Undark says in its subhead on DeLizza's story, which says, "Vaccine hesitant conservatives are also disproportionately rural. This creates unique access problems, including shortages of health-care workers to administer the vaccines and long driving distances to vaccination sites."
Also, "Class is far more predictive
of vaccine hesitancy than either politics or race, with working-class white people being twice as likely to be hesitant as White college
graduates," DeLizza reports, citing polling by the Kaiser Family Foundation.
"Poor White people expressing hesitancy typically have strong religious beliefs, face disproportionate economic and access barriers to vaccination, and have legitimate reasons
to mistrust the medical system," DeLizza writes. "Historically, the same sterilization
programs that the Nation of Islam members evoke also purposefully
targeted poor white people. When Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr.
wrote “Three generations of imbeciles are enough” in a [1927] Supreme Court
ruling upholding Virginia’s involuntary sterilization law, he was
describing a poor White woman with no mental impairment."
Screenshot of top part of NYT graph; click to enlarge. For interactive version, click here. |
DeLizza concludes, "The suspicions felt in Black and brown communities
likely aren’t all that different from the suspicions felt by white
people. In each case, focusing on outlandish vaccine conspiracy theories
glosses over genuine underlying concerns. In each case, vaccine
hesitant Americans are being asked to take a drug developed at
unprecedented speed under unfathomable pressure using novel techniques
based on short-term studies. Taking such a vaccine requires trust in the medical system and in
society more broadly. Most unvaccinated groups have been let down by
both."
No comments:
Post a Comment