Applying Roundup. (Photo by Jen Russell, Farm Journal) |
Although the EPA's withdrawal of its interim approval of the chemical "that does not automatically mean that EPA’s underlying scientific findings regarding glyphosate — including its finding that glyphosate is not likely to be carcinogenic to humans — are either incorrect or cannot be used as support for a future decision following reconsideration in accordance with the court’s decision," the agency said.
The EPA said it “intends to revisit and better explain its evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of glyphosate and to consider whether to do so for other aspects of its human health analysis.” Plus, Abbott reported that the agency would also study the effects of the chemical on endangered species.
“What EPA should do instead is cancel glyphosate products until and unless it re-assesses its risks and assures its safety in a lawful way,” attorney Amy Van Saun of the Center for Food Safety, one of the environmental groups that challenged the EPA in court, told Abbott.
Laura Campbell, the senior conservation and regulatory relations specialist for Michigan Farm Bureau told Jim Wiesemeyer of Farm Journal that it's "important for farmers to know that label restrictions for glyphosate are not changing right now.”
No comments:
Post a Comment