Some anti-abortion states consider extending Medicaid to likely increasing number of pregnant women

Viola's House in Dallas provides housing and services to young,
expectant mothers. (Photo by Allison V. Smith, The Washington Post)

After Roe v. Wade was reversed, many states further restricted abortion. Now some of them are thinking cause and effect, and considering extending Medicaid coverage to pregnant women, reports Molly Hennessy-Fiske of The Washington Post.

Usha Ranji, associate director for women’s health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation, told Hennessy-Fiske, "There’s a discussion among Republicans and those who are anti-choice about, 'What should we be doing to support mothers?'"

Texas is one red state with coverage and care dilemmas: "The limits on Medicaid coverage after the emergency insurance lapses hinge on Texas’s long-standing rejection of the Affordable Care Act, which included provisions for expanded Medicaid," Hennessy-Fiske writes. "And it has set up an uncomfortable dynamic: While Texas and nearly a dozen other red states have resisted expanding Medicaid for those who are pregnant, many of them have also restricted access to abortion, leading to more new mothers needing coverage."

Steve Aden, general counsel and chief legal officer for Americans United for Life, told Hennessy-Fiske, “On our side, there is an awareness and a very strong move after Roe’s overturn toward caring for women. I think the whole movement is looking for ways to implement policy on the state level to support the increasing number of women who will have children.”

John Seago, president of Texas Right to Life, told Hennessy-Fiske, “We want Texas to be abortion-free, but we also want Texas to be pro-life. We want these mothers to be healthy and to have access to the care they need.” The group wants postpartum coverage: “Don’t call it Medicaid expansion, just ensuring insurance for moms up to a year after birth.”