Does SNAP need tweaks to prevent fraud and abuse, or a complete overhaul?

Opinions on the degree of fraud in SNAP vary.
(Adobe Stock photo)

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program provides a lifeline for Americans who struggle to afford enough groceries to survive. The program is critical to rural communities where one in seven rural households relies on SNAP, according to Food Research & Action Center 2025 research.

Despite its importance to millions of Americans, the SNAP system, formally known as food stamps, is considered by the Trump administration to be fraught with fraud and errors that cost American taxpayers millions each year. 

Trump appointees tend to see SNAP fraud as a pervasive problem "perpetrated by organized criminal organizations, individual recipients and retailers willing to break the laws for profit," reports Geoff Mulvihill of The Associated Press. "Some experts agree that SNAP fraud is a major problem."

The sheer size of SNAP spending means taxpayers should expect some losses from errors and fraud. Christopher Bosso, a professor at Northeastern University, who published a book on SNAP, told Mulvihill, "If you’re spending $100 billion on anything, you’re going to have some leakage."

Despite various levels of fraud-prevention and detection investments at the federal and state levels, there are many ways SNAP can be misused. "Organized crime groups put skimmers on EBT readers to get information used to make copies of the benefit cards and steal the allotments of recipients," Mulvihill explains. Crime groups also steal identities and use them to receive benefits. Other times, recipients sell their card benefits.

Mark Haskins and Haywood Talcove, executives at LexisNexis Risk Solutions Government, which helps design fraud-prevention strategies, both "believe fraud costs significantly more than the USDA’s $9 billion estimate," Mulvihill reports. Haskins told AP, "The system is corrupt. It doesn’t need a fix here and there, it needs a complete overhaul."

Researchers and supporters often refer to SNAP fraud as "troublesome," Mulvihill writes. But they don't see program misuse as "massive" enough to require a total overhaul.

Although SNAP fraud data isn't readily available in any public repository where Americans can evaluate it, an April 2025 survey of 1,000 registered U.S. voters commissioned by The Food Industry Association found that 19% of Americans believe that SNAP benefits should be cut due to fraud and abuse, while 21% think people should receive SNAP because they need help. Overall, 64% of respondents had a favorable opinion of SNAP.