Rural communities can learn how to push back on data center construction from resistance to factory farms

The fight about construction of data centers continues across the country, and communities pushing back
on such construction could have a lot to learn about how to resist from the roll out of factory farms almost 40 years ago, Raj Patel and Jim Goodman write for Barn Raiser (republished by Next City). The push for factory farms looked similar to the fight about data centers now, and they write that those similarities might help rural residents resist data center construction more effectively. 

"By the time neighbors organized [against concentrated animal feeding operations], right-to-farm laws and state preemption had severed the ground from under them," the reporters write. And "while CAFOs crept into rural America, data centers are arriving as a land rush. This speed is both terrifying and an advantage." Terrifying because 67% of the 1,500 proposed data centers are in rural areas; an advantage because "CAFO country" has been here before, and the lessons they learned can help other rural places now.

Patel and Goodman have recommendations about what issues rural residents should focus on in hearings with their local elected leaders: water, power, money and democracy. They write that asking questions about those things will provide them with the most salient information. It's a lesson they say came too late for farmers. 

"Everything CAFO country learned, it learned too late, after the wells were ruined, after the smell lowered adjacent property values and health outcomes, after the statutes were written. Data centers are arriving early enough that the questions can still be asked in time."

W.Va. local governments get 24.5% of opioid settlement funds, but the oversight and how the funds are spent varies

Graph by Hannah Heiskell, data from West Virginia First Memorandum of Understanding 

In 2021, West Virginia lost more than one thousand residents due to opioid overdose deaths. Between 2021 and 2024, the state ramped up its prevention and treatment efforts, some of which now benefit from opioid settlement dollars. As investigative student reporters from West Virginia University’s Reed School of Media discovered, how those funds are spent varies widely throughout the state.

"West Virginia will receive about $980 million from the settlement, split into payments over 18 years," reports Hannah Heiskell for Mountain State Spotlight. "The West Virginia First Foundation – a nonprofit created by the state Legislature – will control the spending of 72.5% of the funds, local governments 24.5%, and the West Virginia Attorney General’s Office 3%."

How local governments spend their chunk of settlement funds is limited by state guidance, but includes "increasing access to treatment or prevention-education programs."

With those constraints in mind, WVU student reporters looked at "how local governments oversee that money, including the process through which they take applications, make awards and account for spending," Heiskell explains. Since each local government can make its own decisions, "oversight and accountability built into local spending can be markedly inconsistent from county to county – with some doing very little to collect the advice and opinions of addiction experts or people with lived experience."

Local funding is often decided by county commissioners, who are not subject to the oversight by the West Virginia First Foundation. "While county commissioners are not required to have expertise in substance use disorders or follow a specific application, review, or awarding process, Laura Lander, addiction therapist and associate professor at West Virginia University’s Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, said this thinking confused her," Heiskell reports.

"Without input from external sources and stakeholders, Lander said funding awards are subject to a commissioner’s individual bias," Heiskell writes. Lander told her, "Clearly, in other counties, based on what I’ve seen, the money used for law enforcement has the county commissioner’s ear, and we see lots of money going towards police vehicles."

Kanawha County Commission has opted to share some details by "posting all applications to their website for the public and other organizations to review," Haskell writes. "In contrast to many counties in the state, the Preston County Commission has taken a more deliberate approach to its spending. . . . It's one settlement and 55 systems."