
Berea President Larry Shinn opposes the idea "but wants colleges pushed to do more for needy students," Lewin reports, quoting him: “You see some of these selective liberal arts colleges building new physical-education facilities with these huge sheets of glass and these coffee-and- juice bars, and charging students $40,000 a year, and you have to ask, does this contribute to the public good, or is it just a way for the college to keep up with the Joneses? We are a tax-exempt institution, so I think the public has a right to demand that our educational mission be at the heart of all of our expenditures.”
Our favorite parts of the story are those about Berea: "This year, the college accepted only 22 percent of its applicants. Among those accepted, 85 percent attended Berea, a yield higher than Harvard’s. Berea can be a haven for the lower-income students at high schools where expensive clothes and fancy homes demarcate the social territory," Lewin writes. "With its hilly campus, Georgian president’s mansion and old brick buildings, Berea looks much like any elite New England college. But its operating budget is less than half that of Amherst [College], which has a $1.7 billion endowment and about 100 more students. Faculty pay is much lower, and the student-faculty ratio higher. With no rich parents and no legacy admission slots, fund-raising is far more difficult at Berea." (Read more)
No comments:
Post a Comment