Friday, June 08, 2012

Oil makes North Dakota boom, but at some cost to the environment

ProPublica, an independent investigative news operation, reports that oil companies in North Dakota have documented "more than 1,000 accidental releases of oil, drilling wastewater or other fluids in 2011, about as many as in the previous two years combined." (Photo by Karen Bleier)

Nicholas Kusnetz writes, "Many more illicit releases went unreported, state regulators acknowledge, when companies dumped truckloads of toxic fluid along the road or drained waste pits illegally. State officials say most of the releases are small. But in several cases, spills turned out to be far larger than initially thought, totaling millions of gallons. Releases of brine, which is often laced with carcinogenic chemicals and heavy metals, have wiped out aquatic life in streams and wetlands and sterilized farmland. The effects on land can last for years, or even decades. Compounding such problems, state regulators have often been unable — or unwilling — to compel energy companies to clean up their mess."

Under North Dakota regulations, Kusnetz notes, the agencies that oversee drilling and water safety "can sanction companies that dump or spill waste, but they seldom do: They have issued fewer than 50 disciplinary actions for all types of drilling violations, including spills, over the past three years." Mark Bohrer, who oversees spill reports for the state Department of Mineral Resources, which regulates drilling, told Kusnetz that the number of spills is "acceptable given the pace of drilling and that he sees little risk of long-term damage." Oil companies are drilling upwards of 200 wells each month in northwestern North Dakota, an area roughly twice the size of New Jersey, and the state now ranks second in production. The work has reinvigorated North Dakota's economy; unemployment sits at 3 percent, reversing a population decline that began in the mid-1980s, when the last oil boom went bust.

But there's always a downside. Micah Reuber, former environmental-contaminant specialist in North Dakota for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, said he quit after growing increasingly frustrated with inadequate resources; responding to oil field spills was supposed to be a small part of his job, but it came to consume all of his time. He said no agency, federal or state, has the money or staff to study the effects of drilling-waste releases in North Dakota. Kris Roberts, who responds to spills for the Health Department, said that the state does not have the manpower to prevent or respond to illegal dumping. North Dakota's legislature has passed a few regulations this year, including a rule that bars storing wastewater in open pits. Still, writes Kusnetz, "advocates for landowners say they have seen little will, at either the state or federal level, to impose limits that could slow the pace of drilling." (Read more)

Tomato genome decoded and made public to improve its future production and pest resistance

In Western Farm Press Daniel Stolte reports that an international consortium has deciphered the genetic code of the cultivated tomato and a wild relative. The Tomato Genome Consortium, a group of more than 300 scientists from 14 countries, decided to publish results in the May 31 issue of the journal Nature in an effort to reduce costs and streamline and improve future tomato production and resistance to pests and drought.

"The sequence provides a detailed overview of the functional portions of the tomato genome and its closest relative, revealing the order and structure of their 35,000 genes," writes Stotle, of the University of Arizona. "The tomato belongs to the Solanaceae (nightshade) family, which includes potatoes, peppers and eggplant, plus ornamental or medicinal plants including petunia, tobacco, belladonna, and mandrake. The members of this family have adapted to different ecosystems, from tropical rainforests to the extremely dry Atacama Desert in Chile."

“The tomato is an important biological model system for understanding fruit biology, ripening and crop development,” said Rod Wing, who heads the university's Arizona Genomics Institute. “Having the genome provides a much more precise way of bringing in genes through normal breeding and crossing techniques, and much faster than was possible before.” Having the genome sequence will allow scientists to locate and identify genes more quickly and improve the crop more rapidly. The sequence shows that the genome of tomato “triplicated” suddenly about 60 million years ago, soon after the mass extinction that included the disappearance of the dinosaurs. 

Corporations' increased role in funding university agricultural research raises concerns about influence

UPDATE, June 8: From 1994 to 2010, research and development expenses in the private sector to improve agricultural production increased by more than 40 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars, USDA's Economic Research Service reports.

The gap between federal support for agricultural research at large public universities and private investment continues to widen. A new research report suggests that the divide may mean an increased threats to academic freedom and more potential for corporate meddling in the once-independent university lab.

Alan Scher Zagier of The Associated Press reports, "A recent study shows that nearly one-quarter of the money spent on agricultural research at land-grant universities comes from corporations, trade associations and foundations, an all-time high. Financial support from the U.S. Department of Agriculture accounts for less than 15 percent, the lowest level in nearly two decades." Here's a graph showing the trend:

Zagier says the report by Food and Water Watch, a Washington-based environmental group, is "rife with what it calls examples of how corporate money 'corrupts' the public research mission at land-grant schools, which were created by the Morrill Act of 1862 (which will be 150 years old July 2). The examples range from a University of Georgia food-safety program that allows industry groups to join an advisory board in exchange for annual $20,000 donations, to an Ohio State University professor whose research on genetically modified sunflowers was blocked by two seed companies after the initial results suggested the sunflowers fostered the growth of weeds.

"The report, entitled 'Public Research, Private Gain,' also explores the blurry lines created when universities and industry work together, such as when South Dakota State University sued farmers over wheat-seed patents as part of a public-private coalition formed with a Monsanto Co. subsidiary. The company is known for aggressive litigation against what it calls seed piracy. Kansas State University, Colorado State and Texas A&M have pursued similar lawsuits," Scher Zagier reports. "Such alliances are a far cry from land-grant universities' historic role in promoting public knowledge and freely sharing the fruits of their research," said Patty Lovera, Food and Water Watch's assistant director.

Deans at several agricultural colleges said corporate support is vital but would be unlikely to sway research results or even influence what research gets done. "We're kind of caught between a rock and a hard place," said Thomas Payne, dean of the College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources at the University of Missouri. "In order for research to continue, we have to have support from a variety of sources." With the current five-year Farm Bill set to expire, AP notes, Food and Water Watch is lobbying for a boost in federal investment "in campus agricultural research, with more resources steered toward sustainable methods, organic farming and reduced use of pesticides. The group also is calling for land-grant universities to more fully disclose gifts by private donors and wants agricultural research journals to adopt more stringent conflict-of-interest rules, similar to the recent crackdown by medical journals." (Click here to download the report.)

Ky. paper does first online-first editorial to focus on secretive school board's meeting with job candidate

When a local school board decided to identify, interview and vote on a superindentent candidate all in the same day, an the candidate left some questions unanswered, the Kentucky New Era of Hopkinsville, Ky., posted an online as "breaking news" an editorial saying the decision should wait because candidate Marvin Welch "was unable to articulate what this district could expect from him in terms of leadership and philosophy" and answer other questions raised at community events -- including the graduation rate in the district where he is now assistant superintendent.

"The board should give itself more time on this decision," the editorial concluded. "Christian County Public Schools deserve a top-notch educator to lead the district, its employees and students. It is simply not clear yet if Welch is that person." The editorial was posted two hours before Welch's scheduled, private interview. The board first heard from school principals, then briefly met with Welch and adjourned without action or comment. UPDATE, June 9: The board is still interested in Welch but will interview another candidate and is “probably going to slow down a little bit,” the newspaper reports.

Jennifer P. Brown, the paper's editorial-page editor and former editor, said in an email that she took the unusual step of a "live" editorial because there was "very little time to give the school board any feedback on this candidate, and . . . the newspaper has a very small opportunity to report on this candidate and offer much coverage. So, four New Era employees attended an afternoon community meeting where the candidate gave a brief formal speech and then answered questions." She started writing the editorial during the meeting. Earlier, she had written editorials critical of the board's secretive approach, one of which got a headline-size blurb on Page One.

Reporter Benjamin Joubert's story reported that Welch "couldn’t remember the student minority population of Madison [County] schools when asked. One of the most marked differences between the districts is the percentage of minority population. Madison reported a 90 percent white student population in 2010; five percent were African-American. That same year, Christian County had a 59 percent white student population and 35 percent were African-American." The district's students have low test scores.

Thursday, June 07, 2012

'Ag-gag' laws aimed at photography at agricultural facilities could affect journalists more broadly

The recent rash of state legislation "designed to curb undercover recording at farms and other agricultural facilities may potentially restrict reporters’ ability to gather and publish important information about the food industry," Kristen Rasmussen writes for the spring edition of The News Media and The Law, the quarterly magazine of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press.

"Some of the measures would directly prohibit journalists from photographing or recording farm animals and other items and activities involved in food production in a manner not likely to pass constitutional scrutiny," Rasmussen writes. "Others, however, seek to cut off the dissemination of this information at its source, by criminalizing the actions of whistleblowers. Although the laws and proposed laws differ in the types of activities they criminalize, all are at the center of a legal controversy that pits agricultural interests against those of journalists, activists and employees."

Reporters Committee Executive Director Lucy Dalglish said, “It’s one thing to prohibit trespassing on private property, but regulating legal activity on public land is a very scary trend and most likely wouldn’t pass constitutional muster. These laws also put a severe chill on those who would expose any wrongdoing on farms that could harm the nation’s food supply and health.” (Dalglish is leaving the RCFP to become dean of journalism at the University of Maryland.)

Rasmussen's 2,300-word story is a comprehensive look at the issue, and is accompanied by a description of each "ag-gag" law in Iowa, Kansas, Montana, North Dakota and Utah and the unsuccessful legislation in Minnesota, Missouri and New York.

Obama EPA about same as all the rest, expert says

Contrary to much political rhetoric, the Environmental Protection Agency under President Obama has had pretty much the same approach as EPA under George W. Bush, a law professor who has written extensively on EPA enforcement testified yesterday before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Energy and Power.

Joel A. Mintz, professor of law at Nova Southeastern University in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., testified on behalf of EPA and "told the subcommittee that the Obama EPA has been quite ordinary," reports Todd Neeley of DTN/The Progressive Farmer. "Though other witnesses criticized EPA for what they said was the agency's failure to work with them on a number of issues, Mintz said his research found that the current EPA has provided little contrast in how it enforces regulations compared to other recent administrations."

Under Bush, EPA's civil penalties averaged $117 million per year, and were about $115 million a year in the first three years of the Obama administration. That drop could be the result of better compliance, not weaker enforcement. Mintz testified, "Although there may well be good explanations for these declines, they do support the overall conclusions of my historical research: EPA's enforcement work during the Obama period has been similar in nature to its work in nearly every administration since the agency was established, regardless of the party affiliation of the president." (Read more)

Arkansas Democrat-Gazette raises single-copy price, partly to keep itself a statewide newspaper

The era of statewide, metropolitan newspapers that offered circulation and news coverage in the far  reaches of their states, a critical connection for rural readers, is almost over. But at least one paper is bucking the trend, at a price that it hopes readers will pay.

In the past week, the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette raised its single-copy price to $1 ($2 on Sundays), saying the proliferation of other advertising media and the paper's maintenance of statewide circulation and coverage had made its profits "dwindle to unsustainable levels," Publisher Walter Hussman Jr., right, said in a letter to readers.

"In many ways we have charted a different course," Hussman wrote. "Rather than cutting back on circulation in outlying areas, we have continued to be a statewide newspaper. We believe readers throughout Arkansas are interested in statewide news, and we see evidence that advertisers benefit from our large circulation. Our daily circulation of 178,906 is higher than ten years ago."

Hussman added, "At the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, our plan is to remain a statewide, seven-day-a-week daily newspaper. We also plan to maintain our news staff and provide the type of complete, in-depth reporting that Arkansans have expected from us for decades. But with continued advertising declines, we can see no other way to do this other than fundamentally changing our revenue base. In the future, we will have to rely more heavily on revenue from readers and subscribers." (Read more)

Bucking trends is nothing new for Hussman. Almost alone among major publishers, he resisted the strategy of providing news for free online. Now the industry is moving his way. Had it done so earlier, and also followed his example of staying statewide, the industry and its customer would have been better off.

Wednesday, June 06, 2012

N.C. lets Cherokees expand casino, build two more

Sequoyah Fund map shows Cherokee land (Qualla
Boundary) in red next to Great Smoky Mountains
National Park. Heavy black line is Interstate 26.
North Carolina is allowing the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians to have live card games in the tribe's casino in the Great Smoky Mountains, and giving it the right to open two casinos on tribal lands near the state's southern border west of Interstate 26. The legislature gave final approval to the 30-year deal today, and Gov. Bev Perdue signed it into law minutes later, reports John Frank of The Charlotte Observer.

"The gambling compact now goes to the U.S. Department of the Interior for review but Chief Michell Hicks expects quick approval," Frank writes. "Hicks said the tribe hopes to offer live-dealer games, such as blackjack, roulette and poker by July 4th, a big tourism weekend in the mountains." (Read more)

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/06/06/3296410/perdue-signs-cherokee-gaming-bill.html#storylink=cpy

Coal's share of electric generation keeps dropping

You can blame or credit the warmest March on record in a lot of the country, and historically low natural gas prices driven down by supply from hydraulic fracturing, for a whale of a drop in coal's share of U.S. electric generation in March.
Coal's share of net generation dropped to 34 percent, the lowest since at least January 1973, when the U.S. Energy Information Administration started keeping monthly statistics. Its report  this week notes that "despite seasonally low loads, natural gas-fired generation grew markedly and accounted for 30 percent of overall net generation by March 2012. Total electricity demand fell this winter as warmer weather reduced home heating requirements.

Coal generation decreased 29 billion kilowatt hours from March 2011 to March 2012, while natural gas generation increased 27 billion kwh during the same time period, accounting for 30 percent of generation. Gas prices were near 10-year lows this winter, leading coal-burning utilities in states such as Ohio and Pennsylvania to increase their use of natural gas-fired plants. "Newer gas units operate at higher efficiency than older, fossil-fired units, which increases the competitiveness of natural gas relative to coal," EIA reported.

House GOPers suggest anti-mining activist's photo of 9-year-old girl in foul water is child pornography

As if things weren't ugly enough in the battle over mountaintop-removal coal mining, The Denver Post reports that leading anti-mining activist Maria Gunnoe of West Virginia was questioned for 45 minutes by U.S. Capitol police on suspicion of child pornography after Colorado Republican Rep. Doug Lamborn’s Energy and Mineral Resources Subcommittee members or staff, or both, decided a photo she submitted of a 5-year-old girl in bathwater supposedly fouled by coal mining was inappropriate and told the cops.

On his Coal Tattoo blog, Ken Ward Jr. of The Charleston Gazette writes: "I’m still a little baffled that one of the environmental group lawyers or lobbyists who might have been present at the time didn’t just step in and advise Maria not to go with those police officers unless she was under arrest. Then again, who would have possibly imagined the police going along with something as nutty as this?"

Ward writes, "That a couple of young parents in the richest country in the world — living in a community where untold natural-resource wealth is hauled away every day — don’t have decent water in which to enjoy the wonderful ritual of bath-time with their child?" The outrage has gone viral. On the Ohio Valley's Environmental Coalition's in-house blog, Ward counted four separate posts about the incident. Only grandmother-activist Gunnoe, writing on her Facebook page, said she would like to put it behind her. However, she gave an interview to strip-mining critic Jeff Goodell, who published it with an introduction on the Rolling Stone magazine website.

Only three states, all big in cattle, choose to keep 'lean, finely textured beef' in school lunches

When given the choice by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, the nation's schools have overwhelmingly chosen to buy slightly more expensive beef that is free of "pink slime" than to offer beef that contains the product, formally known as "lean, finely textured beef." The Associated Press reports that only the major beef-packing states of Iowa, Nebraska, and South Dakota chose to keep buying the beef that is derived from beef-fat trimmings that are treated with ammonia hydroxide to remove pathogens such as salmonella and E. coli. Every other state has agreed to pay 3 percent more for beef served in schools. (The company that makes beef containing the product, Beef Products Inc., is based in South Dakota and has had, until recently, facilities in Iowa. The company still operates in Nebraska.)

According to Nirvi Shah of Education Week, the product "can be more susceptible to pathogens than regular cuts of meat because it often comes from the outermost part of cows — where it's more likely to be in contact with fecal matter on a cow's hide. A 2009 New York Times story reported that from 2005-2009 ground beef with lean, finely textured beef was far more likely to have salmonella than ground beef made without it." The USDA maintains that lean, finely textured beef is safe. It has been under fire most recently when food blogger Bettina Siegel called for its removal from school meals, generating a petition that yielded thousands of signatures. Soon after, the USDA gave schools the choice. Shah adds that this move by the states is in line with an earlier poll in which "Americans said they want better nutrition standards for the food and drinks sold in schools." (Read more)

Columnist: What if tables were turned on oil and gas execs who want to keep fracking chemicals secret?

Last week, Joe Blundo, a columnist for The Columbus Dispatch, wrote a humorous column that took direct aim at the way Ohio's legislators wrote legislation to allow natural-gas drillers to keep secret from the public potentially hazardous chemicals they pump into rock formations to release natural gas -- a process known as hydraulic fracturing.

Blundo's column takes the nature of a long joke. It begins: "A 'fracking' executive, a state legislator and an oil-and-gas executive walk into a bar." He likens the "secret-keeping" to not disclosing if peanuts are an ingredient in the highly allergic legislator's meatloaf, for example. There's more. Blundo's column can be read by clicking here. An explanation of the bill under discussion is here.

EPA starts Ky. hearings on 36 surface-mine permits

As hundreds of supporters of mountaintop-removal coal mining held a rally, 75 people "opposed to surface mining held a news conference" late yesterday afternoon in the capital of Kentucky, reports Bill Estep of the Lexington Herald-Leader. (H-L photo: Line forms for public hearing)

"The 200 yards separating them might as well have been a thousand miles. The two camps put their deeply divided views on display as part of the latest chapter in the struggle over mountaintop mining in Kentucky," Estep writes. "The occasion was a hearing in Frankfort by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on its objections to 36 permits for surface mines in Eastern Kentucky. The hearing started after the partisan events."

Two more hearings are scheduled tomorrow in Pikeville, Ky., in the heart of the Central Appalachian coalfield.

Tuesday, June 05, 2012

Cable TV coverage of Wisconsin recall illustrates problems with U.S. politics and public discourse

By Al Cross, Director
Institute for Rural Journalism and Community Issues

In less than an hour tonight, flipping through cable-TV channels, I witnessed what ails American politics and public discourse.

Seeking results and analysis of the recall election for Republican Gov. Scott Walker of Wisconsin, soon after the polls closed at 8 p.m. Central Time, I turned on CNN, which usually has the best journalists and the most balanced treatment of politics.

But just before enough returns came in to make it all but certain that Walker had won, the network gave the last half of the hour to Piers Morgan (who usually has the whole hour) and replays of that day’s coverage of Queen Elizabeth’s diamond jubilee. A couple minutes of the royal family were enough for me, so I switched to Fox News, on an adjoining channel.

Right after Fox host Sean Hannity told viewers that it looked like Walker would win, apparently with the help of a big rural vote (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel map), he got reaction – from a couple of Republicans. Democrats were unrepresented.

Disliking that one-sided presentation, I turned to MSNBC, where liberal Rachel Maddow has been known to give conservatives their due. But she got her initial reaction only from Ed Schultz, a liberal blogger and radio talk-show host who was clearly disappointed, perhaps even upset, that the recall had failed. A couple minutes of that was, again, enough for me. I went back to Piers Morgan.

Soon, though, it was after 9 Central, and CNN had returned to the election. As Dana Bash reported from Walker headquarters, the crowd realized that she was on the air and started booing. On a later report, Walter supporters crowded around her platform and jumped up and down with signs, one saying “Don’t believe the liberal media.”

Bash was playing it straight, as CNN usually does. But neither side seems to think so. When another CNN reporter tried to report on the reaction of recall supporters massed outside the Wisconsin Capitol, they nearly drowned him out with noisemakers and bumped him with small bags bearing dollar signs.

And which of these channels has lost the most audience lately? CNN, apparently because it tries to give viewers what they need – a fair, accurate and reasonably thorough report – rather than what they apparently want, facts that are selectively reported and opinion that confirms their political beliefs.

For more than a decade now, the proliferation of news outlets has made most of them hungrier for audience, so they increasingly give viewers what they want. And the increased competition has made them give an inordinate amount of time to opinion, which is much cheaper and easier to produce than real news, which involves paying journalists to go out and dig up facts.

The market for opinion in this country continues to grow, while the market for facts continues to decline. At some point that becomes bad for a representative democracy, which relies on voters who make informed judgments, not just knee-jerk reactions or echoes of what they have heard or read. I fear we have passed that point.

Farm and energy states are leading the recovery

About half the states are "returning to past robust employment levels," and most are states where farming and the production of oil and gas are important factors, reports Kevin Hall of McClatchy Newspapers.

"Energy and farm states outperformed the nation, as did states near the nation’s capital, according to a new study by a private forecaster," IHS Global Insight, Hall writes. "States that suffered a housing bust, and old industrial states, continue to suffer the most." IHS identifies "three pockets of strength:"

  • Alaska, Louisiana, North Dakota and Texas, all of which are enjoying energy booms, already have returned to peak employment levels, but three of the four have small populations.

  • Maryland, Virginia and Washington, D.C., are within 2 percentage points of peak employment, thanks to government spending and related contracting.

  • Energy-rich Oklahoma, West Virginia and South Dakota are within striking distance of peak employment too, as are Pennsylvania and New York, big states with diversified economies.

  • Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/06/05/151217/at-state-level-unemployments-a.html#storylink=cpy
    Several other states are within 3 percentage points of peak employment, many because of farm exports or strong crop production or both, Hall reports. They include Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska and Vermont. For Hall's story, which includes a list of how much each state is off peak employment, click here.
    Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/06/05/151217/at-state-level-unemployments-a.html#storylink=cpy

    Poll shows public backs subsidies to support crop prices, and help for direct sales to consumers

    The Congressional Connection Poll on federal issues has "found strong support for either increasing or keeping spending about the same for subsidies to farmers and agribusinesses to help guarantee that prices for their crops don’t fall too low," National Journal's Matthew Cooper reports. "Thirty-nine percent of the public wanted the amount spent on such subsidies to go up, while 37 percent wanted it to stay the same. Only 19 percent wanted to see cuts, a significantly lower percentage than the 32 percent who wanted to see food stamps cut." Food stamps are part of the proposed new Farm Bill, now on the Senate floor.

    "The public showed enthusiasm for increasing the amount spent to promote local farmers’ markets, roadside stands, and other direct sales from producers to consumers," Cooper writes. "A near majority, 48 percent, wanted more money spent on this, while only 15 percent wanted such funding cut. Thirty-two percent wanted it kept about the same. The bill that was voted out of the Senate Agriculture Committee included expanded funding to help farmers sell directly to consumers."

    Here's a look at the breakdown by political affiliation (National Journal chart; click on image for larger version):
    The poll was sponsored by the National Journal, a magazine noted for its nonpartisanship. Cooper notes that a poll taken recently by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation of Battle Creek, Mich., "found that 80 percent of the public says Washington should do more to increase access to locally produced food. Although the question was worded somewhat differently than the one posed in the Congressional Connection Poll, the results suggest that these programs may have a political constituency waiting to be tapped." (Read more; tip of the hat to the Daily Yonder)

    Monday, June 04, 2012

    House members of both parties from rural districts object to bill that would reduce rural mail service

    When it comes to restructuring the U.S. Postal Service, Emily Stephenson of Reuters reports, the creators of the cost-cutting House bill that offers a dramatic slashing of rural mail service are having to deal with outspoken rural lawmakers. In a rare display of agreement, legislators from both parties said if the sponsors want their bill to pass, they will have to work with rural members -- many of whom feel that Rep. Dennis Ross, a Florida Republican who co-sponsored the bill with Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) did nothing to address their concerns before writing provisions that would end Saturday delivery and close rural offices.

    "Given the fact that there was no discussion to start with, and a draft bill got written without any interaction with any people whose districts would be severely impacted, it's about time, isn't it?" said Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, a Republican who said her Missouri district's largest town has about 35,000 people. "I hear concerns from pharmaceutical companies because they have mail-order drugs. Certainly the newspapers to our rural communities, all of those newspapers get mailed. . . . It really does change the way that we communicate with people," she said.

    "The timing is tricky," Stephenson writes. "Members of Congress want legislation to help the service avoid default on two payments totaling $11.1 billion to the federal government before the Nov. 6 elections, which could quiet talk that a taxpayer bailout of the USPS could be needed. But lawmakers in tough races, particularly in rural areas, do not want to have to defend voting for legislation that could lead to the closure of post offices in their districts." (Read more) The Senate has passed a bill that would guarantee Saturday delivery for two years, and the postal service has backed off its plan to close thousands of rural offices, reducing their hours instead.

    Farm Bill's shift to crop insurance would still help big farmers most; conservation reserve would be cut

    The Congressional Budget Office confirmed last week that the Senate version of the Farm Bill will save an estimated $23.6 billion over the next 10 years. About three-quarters of that would come from reductions in subsidies for major commodity crops, David Rogers of Politco writes. This represents a huge shift of resources toward new, government-backed crop insurance options that would give farmers more help to pay deductibles. This should save about $17 billion from what are generally seen as traditional support programs, including direct payments made without regard to what is happening out in the fields. (Associated Press photo)

    As the Senate takes up the bill this week, "At issue are government-backed premium discounts designed to make the insurance more affordable to farmers," Rogers writes. "While not truly cash subsidies, the costs have soared in recent years and fit neatly into the environmental narrative that Washington is too quick to help large-scale farm production at the expense of investments in conservation and the land itself." Rogers' story is a good account of a complicated process. You can read it here.

    The Environmental Working Group released new crop-insurance cost data gleaned from Freedom of Information Act requests filed with the federal Risk Management Agency showing that, in 26 cases, policyholders received an annual discount of $1 million or more in 2011. In 10,152 cases, it was $100,000 or more, while the vast majority of farmers received far smaller discounts, averaging closer to $5,000. “The eye-opening analysis shows crop insurance is not only very expensive,” said Craig Cox, EWG’s senior vice president of agriculture and natural resources, “but also very, very generous to large and highly profitable farm businesses.”

    "Because farm subsidies, old and new, have been tied to production, those cultivating the largest acreage get the biggest payouts, Robert B. Semple Jr. wrote in The New York Times yesterday. He noted the bill's proposed cuts in the Conservation Reserve program, " which rewards farmers for converting erodible farmland to grass and other vegetation. However flawed, the old subsidy programs required farmers to act as responsible stewards of the land — promising, among other things, not to drain wetlands. The crop insurance subsidies impose no such obligations."

    Semple writes that the bill repeats the vows made and broken with every Farm Bill, to "end unnecessary subsidies to big farmers, enhance the environment and actually do something to help small farmers and small towns. But what it usually does is find ways of disguising the old inequities, sending taxpayers dollars to wealthy farmers, accelerating the expansion of industrial farming, inflating land prices and further depopulating rural America," and the new one "promises more of the same — excessively generous handouts, combined with a serious erosion of environmental protections." (Read more)

    McCoy-Hatfield update: New DVD movie, real history books and a possible makeover for TV

    UPDATE: On the strength of the TV ratings and the crashing of the festival website from heavy traffic, the Tug Fork region is hoping to realize a long-hoped-for tourism boom for its annual Hatfields and McCoys Festival this weekend, reports Bruce Justice of the Appalachian News-Express in Pikeville, Ky.

    On heels of the news that the History Channel broke advertising-supported cable TV viewership records with its three-part "Hatfields & McCoys" miniseries, comes word from the Kentucky New Era of Hopkinsville that a new movie is coming out tomorrow on DVD about the same family fracas. "Hatfields & McCoys: Bad Blood" was shot in Christian County, in southwestern Kentucky, where there are some low hills but no mountains -- but in the movie things are still not copacetic along the Tug Fork of the Big Sandy River. This version stars Christian Slater, Jeff Fahey and Perry King instead of the History Channel's bigger names of Kevin Costner and Bill Paxton as the chief protagonists.

    America loves its hillbilly throw-downs, but the History Channel has peddled something less than. Which might explain why it's refreshing to report that there is a book that Appalachian historians seem to agree is the best for factual reportage on the fracas. It's called Feud: Hatfields, McCoys, and Social Change in Appalachia 1860-1900, by Altina Waller. Among other things, it says that most members of the families were not involved in the feud, and at the beginning the ties among the Hatfield feudists were more economic than familial. Also, the second phase of the feud was driven mainly by "elites who were in a scramble to buy up land in advance of outside timber and railroad corporations moving into the area," the heart of the Central Appalachian coalfield, Betsy Taylor of the University of Vermont reports on Appalnet, a list-serve for Appalachian academics. UPDATE, June 13: Waller lays out the basic history of the feud, and her analysis of its causes, on the University of North Carolina Press blog.

    A less academic treatment of the feud is a 30-year-old book that is having a big revival online. The electronic version of The Hatfields & The McCoys, by Otis K. Rice, was first printed in 1984 and did only casual business before Memorial Day 2012. (Sadly, Rice did not live to see his success.) Today, his book is topping Amazon's and Barnes & Noble's bestseller lists. (Read more)

    In other feud news, actress Charlize Theron is reported to be shopping (that's Hollywood lingo) a series that centers on a modern-day telling of the feuding families. So far, no takers. But she was shopping it before the History Channel numbers came rolling in: 14 million per episode.

    County unemployment numbers for April, just out, continue to show some job growth in rural areas

    The Daily Yonder's Bill Bishop reports that unemployment in rural America continues to fall with the average unemployment rate in rural counties at 7.7 percent in April. The jobless rate in counties that are near metropolitan areas but are largely rural in character declined to 7.2 percent. Both of these percentages were below the 7.8 average seen in metropolitan counties that month. The figures on county unemployment were just released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. (Read more)

    The drop in unemployment in rural counties represents a full percentage point since April 2011. That's 115,831 more jobs over last year. In the U.S. as a whole, there are 1,547,522 more jobs this April than in April 2011, an increase of just over one percent.

    Friday, June 01, 2012

    AT&T chief backs off idea to sell rural phone lines

    A sale of rural phone lines may be too difficult to pull off, according to AT&T Chief Executive Officer Randall Stephenson. He had said the company would look into selling its 20 million rural phone lines, but he told investors this week that the geography is too diverse and the regulatory agencies too many. Reuters reports that Stephenson told investors that the rural lines he was speaking about span 80 percent of AT&T's geographic footprint. "That's the part that would be causing you to pause in the willingness to take something like that on," he said. (Read more)

    Study offers detail on how High Plains aquifers are being used at unsustainable rates

    A new study looking at key aquifers that lie beneath the Great Plains suggest that areas of Kansas and Texas are drawing groundwater at an unsustainable rate. More than one-third of the Southern Great Plains could be out of water in 30 years, according to the report from University of Texas at Austin's Sustainable Water Resources Program. The findings were published in this week's Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. (Photo by Fernando Salazar)

    These concerns aren't new, but Pete Spotts reports in The Christian Science Monitor that the researchers say their work has built "a detailed picture of these critical water sources – how the amount of water they contain varies with time, location, and regional climate patterns – and could allow for more nuanced approaches to local water management." Those issues are already complicated by competing governmental agencies trying to mete out a vanishing yet shared resource, each wondering how to straddle "the divide between private ownership of land, and by extension the water under it."

    The study has some dire warnings. "One involved the Ogallala Aquifer, a resource that stretches north along the Texas-New Mexico border through the Oklahoma panhandle and western Kansas to extend through virtually all of Nebraska and into eastern Wyoming," Spotts writes. "Farming in the High Plains contributes about $35 billion a year to the economy. The central and southern High Plains is where groundwater losses have been most pronounced. For the southern High Plains in particular, if consumption continues into the future as it did between 1997 and 2007, the aquifer there will be unable to support irrigation for about 35 percent of the region within the next 30 years, the researchers estimate."

    Oregon county lets 39 jail inmates go free when timber revenue and subsequent subsidies run out

    The sheriff's office of Josephine County, Ore., released 39 of its jail inmates this week because the county just couldn't pay for their upkeep anymore. The "funding predicament" reported by Undersheriff  Don Fasching was due to a sharp drop in the county's share of federal timber revenue due to logging cutbacks in national forests to protect northern spotted owl and salmon and because voters turned down a $12 million levy to fill the gap left by the government-provided subsidy's expiration of that revenue which ran out last year.

    Undersheriff Fasching said those inmates released were in jail for drug crimes, minor assaults, burglary, identity theft and probation violation. Jail Commander Vicki Smith said, "We did keep the worst of the worst." Fasching added, "We are concerned for public safety." Applications for gun permits have skyrocketed, according to the Associated Press.

    The AP also reports sheriff's patrols, the district attorney's office, parole and probation supervision and juvenile justice departments all face similar cuts as budgets need to be balanced countywide. Klamath and Lane counties in Oregon have done likewise.

    California egg-farm law prompts alliance of farmers and Humane Society for national cage standard


    A California proposition that voters passed easily into law in 2008 made chicken farmers give their layers enough room to stand and spread their wings. The move, first fought by chicken farmers, is now being embraced by some who say their chickens are happier with the changes. The solution, writes Stuart Pfeifer of the Los Angeles Times, may be going national. "In a rare alliance, The Humane Society (of the United States) and egg ranchers have joined forces to lobby for federal legislation that would set national standards for egg ranches similar to those" in California, notes Pfeifer. (Photo of egg farmer Paul Iniguez by Tomas Ovalle)

    Chad Gregory, senior vice president of the United Egg Producers, a trade organization that represents most of the nation's egg farmers, called it "a major wake-up call to the entire U.S. egg industry." He said that his organization believes the support of the Humane Society is "crucial." The law would, if passed, nearly double the amount of space usually afforded hens. It is common in some states, the story states, for hens "to be housed in less than 70 square inches -- smaller than a sheet of printer paper."

    Not everyone is happy. Some animal-rights groups believe that a federal standard would be weaker than a state-by-state approach. Others believe that approach would take too long. Meanwhile, a lawsuit to invalidate the California law has already been filed in Riverside County, though the law doesn't take effect until 2015. (Read more)

    State fairs' money, ownership issues raise concern that agricultural tradition might be at risk

    In mid-May, Virginia's state fairgrounds were auctioned off to the highest bidder. The right to run the fair was sold to a for-profit firm, a trend becoming more popular as financially squeezed fairs look for ways to keep a tradition alive -- and agricultural interests worry about their future role. (Bob Brown photo)

    Maggie Clark, staff writer for Stateline, the daily news service for the Pew Center for the States, reports that while the majority of state fairs are still government-operated, as "state budgets have shrunk, so have the fortunes of the historically revered state fair. The fairs have lost much of their government subsidy, while still having to cope with a significant amount of state regulation. But the fair’s new ownership has not come without controversy."

    The Virginia fair's new owners are Tennessee-based Universal Fairs, which owns five other state fairs and festivals. Clark writes that Universal "isn’t very much interested in the animal exhibits, crop displays and crafts projects that have marked the fair since its inception. In transitioning to a for-profit model, the Virginia agricultural community is concerned that the new owners will abandon the scholarship offerings for youth in agriculture education programs like 4-H and Future Farmers of America. The already-promised scholarships will be given out this year; beyond that, nothing is guaranteed. The youth livestock competitions have been relocated from the state fair to the Rockingham County Fair in Harrisonburg, in north-central Virginia."

    A similar situation has occurred in Georgia, where a two-fair system has been created. There, the Georgia State Fair also sold out to Universal Fairs but youth livestock competitions and arts and culture shows are run at the Georgia National Fair in Perry. Some think the latter fair is what matters. Jim Tucker, president and CEO of the International Association of Fairs and Expositions, told Clark that "wherever the agricultural community meets to identify the best livestock genetics or swap tips about how to make the best jams will be the home of the true state fair."

    Thursday, May 31, 2012

    Stations can reject political ads that don't come from candidates, but few exercise that power

    As we face an election where voters are likely to be inundated with misleading if not outright false political commercials, dare we hope that broadcasters will refuse to run those that play fast with the facts? It's not widely known, but TV and radio stations and cable companies do have the power to reject ads that do not come from political candidates. And they rarely use that power, according to a study by the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania.

    In the voluntary-response survey of station managers, "Only 56 percent said they screen the accuracy of third-party ads," Justin Peters writes for Columbia Journalism Review. "And just 13 percent of the respondents said their stations had refused to air at least one third-party ad during the past 12 months." Our guess is that most of those who don't screen the ads didn't respond to the survey.

    The study also "suggests that many station managers and executives are unclear about their rights and responsibilities when faced with a political ad that takes liberties with the truth—in particular, whether they can refuse to run certain questionable ads, or suggest edits, or otherwise factcheck the content before it airs," Peters reports.

    Rejecting ads wouldn't necessarily cost money, because they can be quickly fixed, and there are likely to be more orders for ads than time stations will have to broadcast them. Panelists at the center's Washington event "revealed that some stations are already reporting ad space being reserved as far ahead as October," Peters writes. Mike Cavender, executive director of the Radio Television Digital News Association, said one station manager told him, “We’re running around with a bushel basket, trying to catch all the money that’s falling out of the sky.” (Read more)

    Here's our view: Stations should check these ads for accuracy, and reject those that mislead. If they don't, local newspapers should point that out, in addition to doing their own fact-checking.

    'Doc' Watson, American music virtuoso, dies at 89

    Arthel "Doc" Watson, the blind guitarist who "left an indelible mark on American folk and country music," according to The Washington Post, died Tuesday at 89 in his native North Carolina. Wayne Martin, executive director of the state Arts Council, told the Raleigh News & Observer, “He made musical traditions of Western North Carolina and the Blue Ridge Mountains accessible to millions."

    And more than that, said Jed Hilly, executive director of the Americana Music Association. He told the Los Angeles Times, "Doc Watson sort of defined in many ways what Americana has become. He played different styles of American roots music. He played traditional country, he played what would be traditional folk, he played what was traditional bluegrass, he played gospel. . . . Nothing is more definitive than Doc Watson's appreciation for a broad spectrum of music in the Americana world." (Read more)

    "Unlike most country and bluegrass musicians, who thought of the guitar as a secondary instrument for providing rhythmic backup, Mr. Watson executed the kind of flashy, rapid-fire melodies normally played by a fiddle or a banjo," William Grimes wrote for The New York Times. "His style influenced a generation of young musicians learning to play the guitar as folk music achieved national popularity." (Read more)

    'Hatfields & McCoys' drew record ratings, but was rife with inaccuracies; feud hurt region's image

    McCoy brothers await execution by Hatfields. (Chris Large photo)
    The History Channel's miniseries about the most famous of Appalachian family feuds garnered millions of viewers in showings of the first two of three episodes. "Hatfields & McCoys" premiered as the most viewed show ever on advertising-supported cable TV, with 13.9 million viewers, excluding sports, reports TV Week. The second episode drew 13.1 million viewers and the third 14.3 million.

    Though the numbers are impressive, the inaccuracies in the six-hour miniseries cannot be overlooked, writes Gloria Goodale of The Christian Science Monitor. "This is the History Channel debuting its first scripted series, coming out of the gate with the somewhat lofty goal of illuminating some of history’s lesser-known corners," she writes. "While most Americans may know the reference to the 19th-century Appalachian blood feud, few know more than the gun-toting, cartoon cowboy characters who shoot at each other and miss."

    Historian Thomas Flagel told Goodale that it's hard to separate fact from fiction because people were not keeping accurate track of their own stories during the feud. Goodale writes that the show's producers "were at pains to point out in press materials that while not actually filmed in Appalachia," but in Romania, they tried "to capture accurately details of the family fight that eventually involved the U.S. Supreme Court, made international headlines, and nearly pushed Kentucky and West Virginia to the brink of war.'"

    Cheryl Truman of the Lexington Herald-Leader compared the miniseries to the facts in the Lisa Alther book Blood Feud: The Hatfields and the McCoys: The Epic Story of Murder and Vengeance and found some glaring inaccuracies. There is no evidence that the patriarchs, Anderson "Devil Anse" Hatfield and Randolph "Randall" McCoy, were Confederate war buddies, as the series depicts. The series also skews the facts of who survived one of the largest fights in the feud, the New Year's massacre, and omits the Kentucky state government's involvement in ending the feud.

    Alther cited several inaccuracies in an email interview with Christopher John Farley of The Wall Street Journal, but said, "This is how historical fiction works, and the miniseries is a fiction, not a documentary." This was her key point: "During my research I was most surprised to discover the devastating long-term impact this feud has had on Appalachian people. Almost single-handedly it shaped the unfortunate stereotype of the ignorant, drunken, violent, lazy hillbilly, which was used by industrialists after the feud ended to justify their invasion of the southern Appalachians to extract the timber and coal, keeping most of the profits for themselves and leaving behind poverty, diseased and maimed workers, and environmental destruction, including 500 mountains that have been destroyed so far." Alther was referring to mountaintop-removal mining, which began about 40 years ago. The Journal's headline writer missed the mark, saying the feud "ruined the image of rural America," not just Appalachia. But the short interview is worth your time; it is here.

    Wednesday, May 30, 2012

    American Electric Power drops plan to save Ky. coal plant with $1 billion retrofit, 30% rate hike

    Big Sandy Plant (Shawn Poynter photo)
    UPDATE, May 31: Kentucky Power Co., a subsidiary of AEP, dropped its plan for the retrofit of the plant and the rate increase, saying it "expects excess electricity to be readily available for purchase from other sources by the time it would have to comply with the new EPA standards," Scott Sloan reports for the Lexington Herald-Leader. The announcement "is another blow to coal in a state that's one of the nation's leading producers," Sloan writes.

    Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2012/05/30/2206351/kentucky-power-abandons-plan-to.html#storylink=cpy

    Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2012/05/30/2206351/kentucky-power-abandons-plan-to.html#storylink=cpy

    Eastern Kentucky is bracing to see how the state utility commission votes within the next week on a costly proposal to retrofit a power plant to allow it to continue to burn coal instead of cheaper, cleaner natural gas. This is a tough sell in coal country but one that is not as clear-cut as it used to be. Eric Lipton writes in the New York Times that there are, of course, those who believe that to give over the Big Sandy power plant in Louisa to natural gas is tantamount to surrender to the environmentalists. But the truth is more complicated. The surge in natural-gas production in the U.S. through the process of hydraulic fracturing has made gas a cheaper and less polluting alternative to coal, and new anti-pollution rules will make coal plants more costly. Lipton notes that "more than 100 of the 500 of the coal-burning power plants in the United States are expected to be shut down in the next few years."
     
    The Big Sandy's $1 billion retrofit by plant operator American Electric Power to "save coal" will also mean a 30 percent rate hike to its customers. This is something many locals wonder if they can manage when their bill comes. Estimates are that an average AEP residential customer would pay an additional $472 a year to pay for the retrofit. Lipton writes: "Channeling the animosity toward Washington and fears of their livelihoods, coal producers union leaders, landowners and railroads . . . have leaned on county judges, state legislators and other politicians to attempt to silence public criticism of the 30 percent electrical rate increase and to pressure the Kentucky Public Service Commission to approve the retrofit project."

    UPDATE: Sloan notes that the state attorney general's office "took aim at the idea that keeping a coal plant in Eastern Kentucky helps the region's economy," noting that "only 30 percent of the coal burned at Big Sandy comes from Eastern Kentucky," and a retrofitted plant would "likely expand the types of coal that it uses . . . using less low-sulfur Eastern Kentucky coal, and replacing it with more higher-sulfur varieties such as Illinois Basin coal."

    Read more here: http://www.kentucky.com/2012/05/30/2206351/kentucky-power-abandons-plan-to.html#storylink=cpy

    Don't believe what you've heard about brain drain: Rural America's been gaining young, smart adults

    Sometimes it pays to look again at tired data with fresh eyes. That's what Ben Winchester, a research fellow at the University of Minnesota Extension Center for Community Vitality, did. And he found that over the last 20 years there has been an increase in the number of young adults in rural places in Minnesota, and now in a new report, across the Midwest. The report, "Continuing the Trend: The Brain Gain of Newcomers," is summarized in a story in the Daily Yonder which notes that Winchester disputes a lot of accepted wisdom about rural decline. An example: "It is true that the relative percentage of those living in rural places has declined. However, the actual number of people living in rural areas increased between 1970 and 2010 from 53.5 million to 59.5 million."

    Another example: "While some counties lost population overall, they gained population in certain age cohorts, like those in the 30s." In that age group, two-thirds had bachelor's degrees. That's not a brain drain, but brain gain, writes Winchester. They said they came for simpler lives, safety, affordable housing, outdoor recreation, quality schools. Winchester writes that "the preference for living in smaller towns and rural places continued between 2000 and 2010," though the slowing pace of that migration could be explained by the downturn in the economy.

    State legislator says he can't control Topix, sorry

    Looks like folks in Tennessee have been talking to their state legislators again. This time, it's to freshman Republican State Rep. Jeremy Faison who went on Facebook over the Memorial Day weekend to ask his constituents (and everyone else on the planet who is his friend) if they would like him to try to do something about "cyber-bullying." According to David Oatney of the Tennessee Statehouse Examiner, Faison's constituents were actually asking him to do something -- please -- about Topix. Which, as many in rural communities know, "has become a catch-all for discussing all kind of local events anonymously around the country, but it has become something of an Internet gossip hall or a sort of cyber hair-salon in rural East Tennessee." Or rural (insert your state here).

    Faison told the Examiner: "I think people need to understand that we aren't really in a position to regulate the Internet from Nashville, and is that something you'd really want us to do?" Faison went on to say that the Topix site is advertiser-driven, and if you wanted to stop it from existing, stop visiting the website.
    (Read more.)

    USDA closes 125 of 131 Farm Service Agency offices as planned

    The United States Department of Agriculture announced its decision on consolidation of its Farm Service Agency county offices, moving to combine 125 of the 131 offices with other USDA service centers, as required by the 2008 Farm Bill. Public meetings were held within 30 days of the original announcement in every county affected by the proposal. In the USDA announcement, the department states that FSA will provide farmers and ranchers affected by consolidations an opportunity to choose the most convenient neighboring county office to conduct their future business. In addition, all employees in a closing office will be provided an opportunity to continue their work with FSA. Under the USDA's Blueprint for Stronger Service, the agency will also close or consolidate 259 other domestic and seven foreign offices.

    The six proposed county offices that will continue operating are: Lafayette County, Ark.; Boulder County, Colo.; St. Mary Parish, La.; Pamlico County, N.C.; Mayes County, Okla.; and York County, S.C. A complete list of FSA county offices affected by this decision can be obtained by clicking here.

    Tuesday, May 29, 2012

    In dozens of television markets, mostly small ones, stations share or even outsource the local news

    Local broadcast news operations in smaller markets are suffering the same kinds of financial woes that newspapers have so publicly tangled with in recent years, so much so that the Federal Communications Commission indicated last week that it is studying how stations collaborate to cut costs and staff, and what that means for news consumers and local democracy, reports Brian Stelter of The New York Times.

    The FCC says it "does not know how many agreements exist between stations," such as the CBS and NBC affiliates in San Angelo, Tex. (Stetler photo), that share office space, news videos and scripts, but a University of Delaware study last year found such agreements in 83 of the 210 U.S. markets, mainly small ones, Stetler reports. The other San Angelo station, a Fox affiliate, rebroadcasts news from San Antonio, four hours away by car.

    The first "shared services agreements" for small newsrooms occurred a decade ago, when news directors wanted to share costs of, say, a helicopter, but those agreements have expanded to include sharing whole newscasts or segments of newscasts and a cast of reporters, Stetler reports. In some markets, one station, usually an affiliate of Fox or a smaller network, has no news department and its news hours are filled by broadcasts produced by another station that airs its own news at different times. In many towns, the station with no news department is owned by Sinclair Broadcasting.

    This kind of "sharing," Stetler writes, has "drawn the ire of critics, who charge that there are fewer and fewer journalists actually covering the news" and perhaps not fulfilling their government-licensed responsibility to serve the public interest. The agreements themselves may be the problem for the federal regulators who are charged with making sure that competition exists in the marketplace, no matter how small. Despite the rise of the Internet, Stelter writes, "Local television remains the No. 1 source of news for most Americans." (Read more)

    California, largely left out of farm subsidies because of its different crops, has a toehold to keep

    California is the nation's No. 1 agriculture state, on the strength of many crops that are untouched or barely touched by the Farm Bill, which has focused on the big commodities of corn, wheat, soybeans, cotton and rice. Thus, newspaper coverage of the bill tends to be dominated by papers in the Midwest, such as the Des Moines Register and the Omaha World-Herald. Yesterday, the San Francisco Chronicle weighed in with a report from a different perspective.

    California "is destined to cede billions of dollars to entrenched commodity interests in the Midwest and South" as the bill "sets the nation's food policy for the next five years," writes Carolyn Lochhead, the paper's Washington correspondent. "Subsidies in the new legislation would encourage corn and other commodity crops that are a major component of processed foods and animal feed rather than the produce that is the staple of a healthy diet."

    That, of course, is nothing new, but is worth noting in a nation with an obesity epidemic, as is this point: "Because they did not rely on federal payments, California fruit and vegetable growers led the country in innovative farming methods, adapting to market demand and diversifying risk." But that doesn't mean they haven't been trying to get in the Farm Bill. They succeeded to a small degree four years ago, and are hoping to at least maintain those gains this time. "The state's fresh fruit and vegetable growers are pleased that the Senate bill preserves hard-fought gains in the last Farm Bill in 2008, including research for organics and produce, farmers' markets and more fruit and vegetable purchases for school lunches and other federal food programs," Lochhead reports.

    Michael Dimock, president of Roots of Change, a San Francisco philanthropy pushing localized production of fresh food, told the Chronicle that Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., the first ag committee chair from a major fruit-and-vegetable state, "has done the best she can given the realities in Congress right now." (Read more)

    Animal-rights group paying people in West $1 to watch video of 'factory farms' and abbatoirs

    The Farm Animal Rights Movement is paying people $1 to watch a four-minute video of chickens, pigs and cows living in "factory farm" conditions and being led to slaughter in American meat-processing facilities. The belief behind FARM's pay-to-watch campaign, reports Jasmine Elist of the Los Angeles Times, is that once people understand from where their meat comes, they will "drastically and permanently reduce the amount of animal products consumed in their diet." (FARM photo)

    FARM launched a national tour to show the “Farm to Fridge” video in early May. The "10 Billion Lives Tour," named after the estimated number of land animals raised and killed every year for food in the U.S., began in Portland, Ore., and has traveled through California, stopping at colleges, universities and fairs. There have been no protests or counter-campaigns by meat producer advocacy groups at stops along the tour, Elist reports.

    Report says 40 percent of Americans who depend on public transportation live in rural areas

    Nearly 40 percent of Americans who depend on public transit, including senior citizens, the disabled and those with low incomes, live in rural areas, which typically lack public transit, according to report from Reconnecting America, a nonprofit group that promotes public transit. The reports says rural transit agencies operate much differently than urban transit providers. As many as 86 percent of providers offer demand-response service, which operate more like taxi services than big-city buses. Despite the challenges, investment in rural transit is improving, the report finds, and says communities that prioritize services are seeing economic results.

    Meanwhile, Angie Schmitt writes on DC.Streetsblog.org about an innovative funding program in rural Allendale, S.C., where the University Transportation Center, Sisters of Charity, Allendale County, Allendale Alive (a non-profit rural development organization), the South Carolina Department of Transportation and the Lower Savannah Council of Governments chipped in to provide adequate money and services where needed.

    Friday, May 25, 2012

    Federal probe, big sponsorship loss put more heat on Tennessee walking horse industry

    Three trainers of Tennessee walking horses pleaded guilty this week to animal-cruelty charges, and the industry's main event, the annual Tennessee Walking Horse Celebration, in Shelbyville, Tenn., suspended the leader of the three for life. The week before, the event had lost the sponsorship of PepsiCo after an ABC News "Nightline" report showed well-known Collierville trainer Jackie McConnell, right, abusing horses, the Shelbyville Times-Gazette reports. (1997 photo by The Tennessean)

    McConnell, the industry's trainer of the year in 1986, and two of his employees pleaded guilty in federal court to conspiracy to defraud the United States. "All three likely face probation for up to six months after a plea agreement and recommendations of the U.S. attorney's office," reports Todd South of the Chattanooga Times Free Press. Still, some "walking horse faithful" said the convictions "could deter future horse abuse," South writes.

    McConnell's violation involved false paperwork, but his employees pleaded guilty to transporting and showing horses that were victims of soring, "an illegal practice sometimes involving mechanical and chemical damage to a horse's feet with such items as kerosene and metal bolts," South reports. "The abusive methods alter the natural high-stepping gait of the horse to achieve the coveted 'big lick' step, which often helps trainers win competitions."

    Tracy Simmons of the Shelbyville paper reports that national coverage of the case has influenced "local public perception" of the industry. She based that on interviews, posts to the paper's Facebook page and responses to an online poll. (We think any such polls should note that they are not reliable representations of public opinion, because their samples are self-selected and not scientific, but they are more legitimate when combined with social media and interviews.)

    The paper also published a letter to the editor, from Barry Childers of Shelbyville, recalling how "The Celebration started out as a simple fundraiser horse show for the Lions' Club and Rotary Club and has grown to be one of the most prestigious events in the world, resulting in a $40,000,000 impact on our area each year," and has taken steps to prevent the showing of sored horses. But this week's convictions were the first in perhaps 20 years, under a law passed in 1966.

    Minnesotans in 30s and 40s moving to rural areas

    Minnesotans in their 30s and 40s are moving from urban to rural areas "that otherwise are experiencing population declines" because of "community, lifestyle and economics," Minnesota Public Radio reports.

    Highly disputed ban on packer ownership of cattle to be offered as Farm Bill admendment

    The South Dakota Stockgrowers Association sent out an alert this week saying that a provision that would ban packer ownership of livestock will be offered as an amendment to the 2012 Senate Farm Bill next week. The move rekindles a debate that the Obama administration thought it had ended last year, largely in favor of meatpackers, especially been producers. (Photo by Peter Alexander Robb)

    The amendment is authored by Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, and Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. The Daily Yonder reports that the amendment is backed by the Stockgrowers and by the Rancher-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund. It is opposed by the National Cattlemen's Beef Association. (Read more) According to the Stockgrowers, Grassley is offering his amendment to the full Senate because he lacked support in the Senate Agriculture Committee.