While George Zimmerman's defense never specifically mentioned Florida's controversial "stand your ground" law in his trial for shooting unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, jurors were instructed before deliberating to consider the law, "which eliminated a citizen’s 'duty
to retreat' before using lethal force in the face of a deadly threat," David Ovalle writes for the Miami Herald. “Under the law, the defense has no burden to prove anything. Only
prosecutors must prove a case, beyond a reasonable doubt. And under the stand-your-ground law, that meant they had to
prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Zimmerman was not acting in
self-defense."
Legal analysts say the prosecution never came close to proving its case, and as a result, Zimmerman was found not-guilty, Ovalle writes. Jude M. Faccidomo, former president of Miami’s Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said the jury clearly believed in the right to self-defense: “Especially when cases are so gray, like this one was, self-defense really resonates because people can associate with being afraid.” (Read more)
Legal analysts say the prosecution never came close to proving its case, and as a result, Zimmerman was found not-guilty, Ovalle writes. Jude M. Faccidomo, former president of Miami’s Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, said the jury clearly believed in the right to self-defense: “Especially when cases are so gray, like this one was, self-defense really resonates because people can associate with being afraid.” (Read more)
No comments:
Post a Comment