"To the biotech world, precise tinkering with the genes in plants and animals is a proven way to reduce disease, protect from insects and increase the food supply to curb world hunger," Borenstein and Ritter write. "To skeptics, genetic changes put the natural world and the food supply at risk. Modified organisms can escape into the wild or mingle with native species, potentially changing them, with unknown effects." Over the last 15 years genetically engineered plants have accounted for more than 2 billion acres of crops in over 20 countries.
Traditional breeding has been compared to using a sledgehammer, while genetic engineers say their process is more like using a scalpel. "All of the animals, plants and microbes we use in our food system, our agricultural system, are genetically modified in one way or another," Bruce Chassy of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign told AP. "That, or they're wild." Martina Newell McGloughlin, director of the University of California's Biotechnology Research and Education Program, added, "Genetic engineering is more precise and predictable, yet it is regulated up the wazoo. Yet there is no regulation at all on the traditional breeding system." (Read more)
No comments:
Post a Comment