That "could increase momentum for rules aimed at further reducing the risk of shipping crude by rail," the reporters write, noting that "Last year, the Transportation Department proposed additional new rules for tank cars carrying crude, presenting three main options. One would stick with the CPC-1232, but the other two would make new cars stronger and retrofit existing cars.
The White House is now reviewing these options and is expected to issue recommendations in May.
Meanwhile, some states remain woefully unprepared to handle such disasters. In Oregon, "State officials have moved slowly to address oil-train safety gaps since the trains started rolling in late 2012," Rob Davis reports for The Oregonian.
"Trains haul crude oil throughout Oregon, along some of its most iconic and scenic locations, passing Multnomah Falls, through the Columbia River Gorge and along the Deschutes River. They move through Portland south along Interstate 5, crossing the Willamette River," Davis writes. "Yet, planning and readiness in Oregon have lagged despite the dangers. Though there have been no major accidents in the state, oil trains have introduced catastrophic spill risks in areas where they did not exist before."
Rep. Barbara Smith Warner (D-Portland) has introduced legislation that "would levy a one-time, $3.75 million assessment split among railroads moving oil through Oregon to pay for spill readiness as well as the supplies first responders need to address oil train accidents," Davis writes. "A recurring $375,000 annual fee also would be split among those railroad companies to pay to continue oil spill planning along rail routes." (Read more)