PBS and NPR executives pledge to push back 'very hard' against White House efforts to end taxpayer support

PBS’s Paula Kerger

PBS and NPR leaders say they are exploring legal options to protect their services from President Trump's executive order barring them from receiving taxpayer dollars through the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

PBS’s chief executive, Paula Kerger, "told CBS News’s Face the Nation that Republican-led threats to withdraw federal funding from public broadcasters had been around for decades but are 'different this time,' reports Edward Helmore of The Guardian. NPR’s CEO Katherine Maher agreed and said that both services will be "'pushing back very hard, because what’s at risk are our stations, our public television, our public radio stations across the country.'"

The White House maintains that taxpayer dollars should not support biased broadcasting. Helmore writes, "The order added: 'Which viewpoints NPR and PBS promote does not matter. What does matter is that neither entity presents a fair, accurate, or unbiased portrayal of current events to taxpaying citizens.'"

NPR’s Katherine Maher

As the battle ensues, services to many rural Americans would be the first affected. Helmore reports, "Maher said in an April interview with NPR that rural stations would see the biggest impact. 'You could see some of those stations really having to cut back services or potentially going away altogether.'" NPR radio has historically been one place rural Americans turned to for emergency alerts and safety directions.

PBS stations in rural areas could also face shortfalls and possible cuts. Helmore adds, "A fact sheet from PBS says on average federal funds make up 15% of their revenue, but a funding cut would be especially acute for smaller and rural stations."

It's uncertain how Trump's executive order will be implemented. "The CPB’s budget is already approved by Congress through 2027, and in a statement to The New York Times, CPB’s president, Patricia Harrison, said the agency was not subject to the president’s authority," Helmore reports. “'Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private non-profit corporation wholly independent of the federal government,' she said."

On the whole, the CPB spends "more money on less populated states," reports Alex Curley of Current. "We can also say that, despite a few blue-leaning outliers like the District of Columbia and Vermont, public media stations in states that voted Republican in the last Presidential election tended to get more Community Service Grants, or CSG money, per person than in states that voted Democrat."

The CPB awards money through its Community Service Grants, or CSGs.
(Graphic by Alex Curley, Current, from CPB data)

Ohio could end tainted public subsides for failed coal plants, but lawmakers add a catch to their new energy plans

The bailed-out coal plants were built in the 1950s.
(Adobe Stock photo)

The Ohio legislature finally overhauled subsidies for two failing coal mines that have cost state taxpayers $400,000 per day since 2019. The hefty charges originated in the state's infamous House Bill 6 energy bill that grew into the "largest corruption scandal in state history," reports Julie Carr Smyth of The Associated Press.

House Bill 15 would rid Ohio consumers of the "legacy generation rider” contained in House Bill 6 for the Ohio Valley Electric Corp. "The Ohio Senate passed its version of the legislation in a rare unanimous vote Wednesday, before sending it back to the Ohio House," Smyth explains. "The bill goes next to Gov. Mike DeWine, whose office said he is reviewing the amended measure."

Beyond ending expensive subsidies, the bill "requires utilities to routinely come in for rate cases and justify how they spend ratepayer-collected money," Smyth reports. It contains a loan program to lower energy costs for public schools and ensures consumers are refunded for incorrect charges.

The subsides' corruption history is one that current Ohio lawmakers have sought to decry and erase. State Rep. Casey Weinstein's commented on the scandal saying: "It was an outrageous misuse of public funds — sending hundreds of thousands of dollars a day to an aging coal plant in Indiana. Putting an end to that is a victory for ratepayers across the state."

Even as lawmakers cheer their success, the state's new energy bills are being met with mixed responses. Cathy Cowan Becker writes in her opinion for the Ohio Capital Journal, "Ohio could finally see the end to some of the worst aspects of 2019’s House Bill 6 — which David Roberts of Vox called 'the worst energy bill of the 21st century.'"

As Becker writes, "That is great news — but it [could] come at a high cost. Instead of bailing out coal and nuclear plants, Ohioans could find themselves living next to large gas plants, pushed through a fast-track approval process without local approval, supplied with gas from fracking our parks."